Recognizing Intensive Care Unit Delirium: Are Critical Care Nurses Ready?

IF 2.4 3区 医学 Q1 NURSING
Mu-Hsing Ho, Hui-Chen Rita Chang, Megan F Liu, Kee-Hsin Chen, Shu-Tai Shen Hsiao, Victoria Traynor
{"title":"Recognizing Intensive Care Unit Delirium: Are Critical Care Nurses Ready?","authors":"Mu-Hsing Ho,&nbsp;Hui-Chen Rita Chang,&nbsp;Megan F Liu,&nbsp;Kee-Hsin Chen,&nbsp;Shu-Tai Shen Hsiao,&nbsp;Victoria Traynor","doi":"10.1097/jnr.0000000000000487","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Delirium remains significantly undetected in the intensive care unit (ICU). Little is known regarding the level of delirium care knowledge among critical care nurses in Taiwan.</p><p><strong>Purpose: </strong>This study was designed to investigate the level of knowledge about delirium care among critical care nurses using a multiple-choice question quiz.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A descriptive, cross-sectional approach was used, and data were collected using a web-based survey. The demographic characteristics including age, years worked as critical care nurse, gender, advanced ICU training, educational level, and type of ICU, along with a delirium care knowledge quiz, were collected. The quiz consisted of 16 items measuring (a) symptoms, types, and outcomes; (b) high-risk groups; (c) predisposing and precipitating factors; and (d) assessment and detection of delirium. Data were collected between October 6 and November 16, 2020.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>In total, 324 critical care nurses completed the survey. The rate of correct response on the delirium care quiz for each domain was measured: (a) symptoms, types, and outcomes: 67.1%; (b) high-risk groups: 76.2%; (c) predisposing and precipitating factors: 78.9%; and (d) assessment and detection: 41.5%. The item with the lowest correct response rate was related to the interpretation of delirium assessments.</p><p><strong>Conclusion/implications for practice: </strong>The findings of this study suggest that future studies and education should focus on the use and interpretation of the assessment using a valid delirium assessment tool to improve the ability of critical care nurses to detect delirium in ICU settings.</p>","PeriodicalId":49158,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Nursing Research","volume":"30 3","pages":"e214"},"PeriodicalIF":2.4000,"publicationDate":"2022-06-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"2","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Nursing Research","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1097/jnr.0000000000000487","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"NURSING","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 2

Abstract

Background: Delirium remains significantly undetected in the intensive care unit (ICU). Little is known regarding the level of delirium care knowledge among critical care nurses in Taiwan.

Purpose: This study was designed to investigate the level of knowledge about delirium care among critical care nurses using a multiple-choice question quiz.

Methods: A descriptive, cross-sectional approach was used, and data were collected using a web-based survey. The demographic characteristics including age, years worked as critical care nurse, gender, advanced ICU training, educational level, and type of ICU, along with a delirium care knowledge quiz, were collected. The quiz consisted of 16 items measuring (a) symptoms, types, and outcomes; (b) high-risk groups; (c) predisposing and precipitating factors; and (d) assessment and detection of delirium. Data were collected between October 6 and November 16, 2020.

Results: In total, 324 critical care nurses completed the survey. The rate of correct response on the delirium care quiz for each domain was measured: (a) symptoms, types, and outcomes: 67.1%; (b) high-risk groups: 76.2%; (c) predisposing and precipitating factors: 78.9%; and (d) assessment and detection: 41.5%. The item with the lowest correct response rate was related to the interpretation of delirium assessments.

Conclusion/implications for practice: The findings of this study suggest that future studies and education should focus on the use and interpretation of the assessment using a valid delirium assessment tool to improve the ability of critical care nurses to detect delirium in ICU settings.

识别重症监护病房谵妄:重症监护护士准备好了吗?
背景:谵妄在重症监护病房(ICU)仍未被发现。台湾重症护理护士对谵妄护理知识的了解甚少。目的:本研究采用多项选择测验的方法,调查危重病护理护士对谵妄护理的知识水平。方法:采用描述性横断面方法,并通过基于网络的调查收集数据。收集人口统计学特征,包括年龄、担任重症监护护士年限、性别、重症监护高级培训、文化程度、重症监护类型,并进行谵妄护理知识测验。测验包括16个项目,测量(a)症状、类型和结果;(b)高危群体;(c)诱发和促成因素;(d)谵妄的评估和检测。数据收集于2020年10月6日至11月16日。结果:共有324名重症护理护士完成调查。对谵妄护理测验的每个领域的正确反应率进行测量:(a)症状、类型和结果:67.1%;(b)高危人群:76.2%;(c)诱发和促成因素:78.9%;(d)评估和检测:41.5%。正确回答率最低的项目与谵妄评估的解释有关。结论/实践启示:本研究结果提示,未来的研究和教育应侧重于使用有效的谵妄评估工具来使用和解释评估,以提高重症监护护士在ICU环境中发现谵妄的能力。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
4.20
自引率
3.70%
发文量
60
审稿时长
>12 weeks
期刊介绍: ​​​The Journal of Nursing Research (JNR) is comprised of original articles that come from a variety of national and international institutions and reflect trends and issues of contemporary nursing practice in Taiwan. All articles are published in English so that JNR can better serve the whole nursing profession and introduce nursing in Taiwan to people around the world. Topics cover not only the field of nursing but also related fields such as psychology, education, management and statistics.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信