Linear equality constraints: Reformulations of criterion related profile analysis with extensions to moderated regression for multiple groups.

IF 7.6 1区 心理学 Q1 PSYCHOLOGY, MULTIDISCIPLINARY
Mark L Davison, Ernest C Davenport, Hao Jia
{"title":"Linear equality constraints: Reformulations of criterion related profile analysis with extensions to moderated regression for multiple groups.","authors":"Mark L Davison,&nbsp;Ernest C Davenport,&nbsp;Hao Jia","doi":"10.1037/met0000430","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Criterion-related profile analysis (CPA) is a least squares linear regression technique for identifying a criterion-related pattern (CRP) among predictor variables and for quantifying the variance accounted for by the pattern. A CRP is a pattern, described by a vector of contrast coefficients, such that predictor profiles with higher similarity to the pattern have higher expected criterion scores. A review of applications shows that researchers have extended the analysis to meta-analyses, logit regression, canonical regression, and structural equation modeling. It also reveals a need for better methods of comparing CRPs across populations. While the original method for identifying the CRP tends to underestimate the variance accounted for by pattern only, both the pattern identified by the original method and the pattern identified by the new method proposed here have useful and complementary interpretations. Imposing linear equality constraints on regression coefficients yields a more accurate method of estimating the variance accounted for by pattern only, and this constrained approach leads to moderated regression models for investigating whether the CRP is the same in two or more populations. Finally, we show how the elements in Cronbach and Gleser's (1953) classic profile decomposition are related to the linear regression model and the CPA model. Academic ability tests as predictors of college GPA are used to illustrate the analyses. Implications of the profile pattern models for psychological theory and applied decision-making are discussed. (PsycInfo Database Record (c) 2023 APA, all rights reserved).</p>","PeriodicalId":20782,"journal":{"name":"Psychological methods","volume":"28 3","pages":"600-612"},"PeriodicalIF":7.6000,"publicationDate":"2023-06-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"2","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Psychological methods","FirstCategoryId":"102","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1037/met0000430","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"心理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"PSYCHOLOGY, MULTIDISCIPLINARY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 2

Abstract

Criterion-related profile analysis (CPA) is a least squares linear regression technique for identifying a criterion-related pattern (CRP) among predictor variables and for quantifying the variance accounted for by the pattern. A CRP is a pattern, described by a vector of contrast coefficients, such that predictor profiles with higher similarity to the pattern have higher expected criterion scores. A review of applications shows that researchers have extended the analysis to meta-analyses, logit regression, canonical regression, and structural equation modeling. It also reveals a need for better methods of comparing CRPs across populations. While the original method for identifying the CRP tends to underestimate the variance accounted for by pattern only, both the pattern identified by the original method and the pattern identified by the new method proposed here have useful and complementary interpretations. Imposing linear equality constraints on regression coefficients yields a more accurate method of estimating the variance accounted for by pattern only, and this constrained approach leads to moderated regression models for investigating whether the CRP is the same in two or more populations. Finally, we show how the elements in Cronbach and Gleser's (1953) classic profile decomposition are related to the linear regression model and the CPA model. Academic ability tests as predictors of college GPA are used to illustrate the analyses. Implications of the profile pattern models for psychological theory and applied decision-making are discussed. (PsycInfo Database Record (c) 2023 APA, all rights reserved).

线性等式约束:标准相关轮廓分析的重新表述与扩展到多组的缓和回归。
标准相关剖面分析(CPA)是一种最小二乘线性回归技术,用于在预测变量中识别标准相关模式(CRP)并量化该模式所占的方差。CRP是一种模式,由对比系数向量描述,因此与模式相似度较高的预测者具有较高的预期标准分数。对应用的回顾表明,研究人员已经将分析扩展到元分析、logit回归、典型回归和结构方程建模。它还表明需要更好的方法来比较不同人群的crp。虽然识别CRP的原始方法往往低估了仅由模式引起的方差,但由原始方法识别的模式和本文提出的新方法识别的模式都有有用的和互补的解释。对回归系数施加线性相等约束产生了一种更准确的方法来估计仅由模式引起的方差,并且这种约束方法导致了用于调查两个或多个人群中CRP是否相同的缓和回归模型。最后,我们展示了Cronbach和Gleser(1953)经典剖面分解中的元素如何与线性回归模型和CPA模型相关。以学业能力测试作为大学GPA的预测因子来说明分析。讨论了轮廓模式模型在心理理论和应用决策方面的意义。(PsycInfo数据库记录(c) 2023 APA,版权所有)。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Psychological methods
Psychological methods PSYCHOLOGY, MULTIDISCIPLINARY-
CiteScore
13.10
自引率
7.10%
发文量
159
期刊介绍: Psychological Methods is devoted to the development and dissemination of methods for collecting, analyzing, understanding, and interpreting psychological data. Its purpose is the dissemination of innovations in research design, measurement, methodology, and quantitative and qualitative analysis to the psychological community; its further purpose is to promote effective communication about related substantive and methodological issues. The audience is expected to be diverse and to include those who develop new procedures, those who are responsible for undergraduate and graduate training in design, measurement, and statistics, as well as those who employ those procedures in research.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信