Effects of helical centerline stent vs. straight stent placement on blood flow velocity.

Frontiers in Medical Technology Pub Date : 2023-06-02 eCollection Date: 2023-01-01 DOI:10.3389/fmedt.2023.1196125
Yutaro Kohata, Makoto Ohta, Kazuyoshi Jin, Hitomi Anzai
{"title":"Effects of helical centerline stent vs. straight stent placement on blood flow velocity.","authors":"Yutaro Kohata, Makoto Ohta, Kazuyoshi Jin, Hitomi Anzai","doi":"10.3389/fmedt.2023.1196125","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>As an approach to maintain patency in femoropopliteal stenting, a helical stent configuration was proposed, which showed improved patency in clinical trials. However, the effects of helical stent placement on the flow have not been quantitatively analyzed. The purpose of this study was to estimate flow velocities to quantify the influence of helical stent placement. Helical and straight stents were implanted in three healthy pigs, and the flow velocities were estimated using the time-intensity curve (TIC) in the angiography images. The angiographic images indicated thinning of the leading edge of the contrast medium through the helically deformed artery, which was not observed in the straight stent. The slower rise of the TIC peak in the helical stent indicated faster travel of this thinner edge. Arterial expansion due to stenting was observed in all cases, and the expansion rate varied according to location. All cases of helical stent implantation showed that velocity was maintained (55.0%-71.3% velocity retention), unlike for straight stent implantation (43.0%-68.0% velocity retention); however, no significant difference was observed.</p>","PeriodicalId":12599,"journal":{"name":"Frontiers in Medical Technology","volume":"5 ","pages":"1196125"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-06-02","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10272720/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Frontiers in Medical Technology","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.3389/fmedt.2023.1196125","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2023/1/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

As an approach to maintain patency in femoropopliteal stenting, a helical stent configuration was proposed, which showed improved patency in clinical trials. However, the effects of helical stent placement on the flow have not been quantitatively analyzed. The purpose of this study was to estimate flow velocities to quantify the influence of helical stent placement. Helical and straight stents were implanted in three healthy pigs, and the flow velocities were estimated using the time-intensity curve (TIC) in the angiography images. The angiographic images indicated thinning of the leading edge of the contrast medium through the helically deformed artery, which was not observed in the straight stent. The slower rise of the TIC peak in the helical stent indicated faster travel of this thinner edge. Arterial expansion due to stenting was observed in all cases, and the expansion rate varied according to location. All cases of helical stent implantation showed that velocity was maintained (55.0%-71.3% velocity retention), unlike for straight stent implantation (43.0%-68.0% velocity retention); however, no significant difference was observed.

Abstract Image

Abstract Image

螺旋中心线支架与直支架对血流速度的影响。
作为股动脉支架置入术中保持通畅的一种方法,螺旋支架结构被提出,并在临床试验中显示出更好的通畅性。然而,螺旋支架置入对血流的影响尚未得到定量分析。本研究旨在估算血流速度,以量化螺旋支架置入的影响。在三头健康猪体内植入了螺旋支架和直支架,并利用血管造影图像中的时间-强度曲线(TIC)估算了血流速度。血管造影图像显示,造影剂通过螺旋变形动脉的前缘变薄,而在直支架中却观察不到这种现象。螺旋支架中 TIC 峰值的上升速度较慢,表明这种较薄边缘的移动速度较快。在所有病例中都观察到了支架植入导致的动脉扩张,扩张速度因位置而异。所有植入螺旋支架的病例都显示速度得以保持(速度保持率为 55.0%-71.3% ),而植入直线支架的病例则不同(速度保持率为 43.0%-68.0% );不过,没有观察到显著差异。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信