Benefits of expanding behavioral health screening in a pediatric diabetes clinic to include anxiety and caregiver reports in youth 12 years and younger.

IF 1.2 4区 医学 Q3 FAMILY STUDIES
Families Systems & Health Pub Date : 2024-03-01 Epub Date: 2023-08-17 DOI:10.1037/fsh0000840
Nicholas David W Smith, Kevin R Lewis, Marissa A Feldman
{"title":"Benefits of expanding behavioral health screening in a pediatric diabetes clinic to include anxiety and caregiver reports in youth 12 years and younger.","authors":"Nicholas David W Smith, Kevin R Lewis, Marissa A Feldman","doi":"10.1037/fsh0000840","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>Depression and anxiety among youth with Type 1 diabetes (T1D) are associated with poor diabetes management. Further guidance regarding psychosocial screening measures would benefit pediatric integrated care clinics. The purpose of this exploratory study was to examine whether screening for anxiety, assessing caregiver reports, and screening children 12 years old and younger could identify a larger percentage of youth who may benefit from behavioral health support compared to the standard approach of only screening youth 13 and older for depression.</p><p><strong>Method: </strong>Sixty-five youth 8-17 years old with T1D (<i>N</i> = 65; <i>M</i> = 13.2 years; 55.4% females) and their caregivers (75% mothers) completed validated self-report and proxy-report depression and anxiety screeners during routine clinic visits between 2019 and 2021. Twenty-seven youth aged 13-17 also completed a measure of diabetes-related distress.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The standard approach of screening youth aged 13-17 for depression via self-report identified 25.6% of participants, whereas screening youth ages 8-17 for depression and anxiety via self- and proxy-reports identified 47.7%. Screening for depression/anxiety identified unique portions of youth independent of diabetes distress.</p><p><strong>Discussion: </strong>Utilizing anxiety and proxy-report measures may identify youth likely to benefit from behavioral health support who are not identified when only a self-report depression measure is used in screening. Research should evaluate whether utilizing multiple measures and screening children under 13 years old improve detection and connection to care for youth experiencing difficulty managing diabetes. Early identification and intervention could subsequently mitigate the negative impacts of social-emotional difficulties on diabetes management. (PsycInfo Database Record (c) 2024 APA, all rights reserved).</p>","PeriodicalId":55612,"journal":{"name":"Families Systems & Health","volume":" ","pages":"116-121"},"PeriodicalIF":1.2000,"publicationDate":"2024-03-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Families Systems & Health","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1037/fsh0000840","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2023/8/17 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"FAMILY STUDIES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Introduction: Depression and anxiety among youth with Type 1 diabetes (T1D) are associated with poor diabetes management. Further guidance regarding psychosocial screening measures would benefit pediatric integrated care clinics. The purpose of this exploratory study was to examine whether screening for anxiety, assessing caregiver reports, and screening children 12 years old and younger could identify a larger percentage of youth who may benefit from behavioral health support compared to the standard approach of only screening youth 13 and older for depression.

Method: Sixty-five youth 8-17 years old with T1D (N = 65; M = 13.2 years; 55.4% females) and their caregivers (75% mothers) completed validated self-report and proxy-report depression and anxiety screeners during routine clinic visits between 2019 and 2021. Twenty-seven youth aged 13-17 also completed a measure of diabetes-related distress.

Results: The standard approach of screening youth aged 13-17 for depression via self-report identified 25.6% of participants, whereas screening youth ages 8-17 for depression and anxiety via self- and proxy-reports identified 47.7%. Screening for depression/anxiety identified unique portions of youth independent of diabetes distress.

Discussion: Utilizing anxiety and proxy-report measures may identify youth likely to benefit from behavioral health support who are not identified when only a self-report depression measure is used in screening. Research should evaluate whether utilizing multiple measures and screening children under 13 years old improve detection and connection to care for youth experiencing difficulty managing diabetes. Early identification and intervention could subsequently mitigate the negative impacts of social-emotional difficulties on diabetes management. (PsycInfo Database Record (c) 2024 APA, all rights reserved).

扩大儿科糖尿病诊所的行为健康筛查范围,将 12 岁及以下青少年的焦虑和护理人员报告纳入其中的益处。
导言:1 型糖尿病(T1D)青少年患者的抑郁和焦虑与糖尿病管理不善有关。有关社会心理筛查措施的进一步指导将使儿科综合护理诊所受益匪浅。这项探索性研究的目的是,与只对 13 岁及以上青少年进行抑郁筛查的标准方法相比,通过筛查焦虑、评估照顾者的报告以及筛查 12 岁及以下的儿童,是否能识别出更多可能受益于行为健康支持的青少年:65 名 8-17 岁患有 T1D 的青少年(N = 65;M = 13.2 岁;55.4% 为女性)及其照顾者(75% 为母亲)在 2019 年至 2021 年期间的常规门诊就诊期间完成了经过验证的自我报告和代理报告抑郁和焦虑筛查。27名13-17岁的青少年还完成了糖尿病相关困扰的测量:通过自我报告对 13-17 岁青少年进行抑郁筛查的标准方法发现了 25.6% 的参与者,而通过自我报告和代理报告对 8-17 岁青少年进行抑郁和焦虑筛查则发现了 47.7% 的参与者。抑郁/焦虑筛查发现了与糖尿病困扰无关的独特青少年群体:讨论:利用焦虑和代理报告测量方法可以识别出可能从行为健康支持中受益的青少年,而在筛查中仅使用自我报告抑郁测量方法时则无法识别出这些青少年。研究应评估使用多种测量方法和对 13 岁以下儿童进行筛查是否能更好地发现有糖尿病管理困难的青少年并为其提供护理。早期识别和干预可以减轻社会情感障碍对糖尿病管理的负面影响。(PsycInfo Database Record (c) 2024 APA, 版权所有)。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Families Systems & Health
Families Systems & Health HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES-PUBLIC, ENVIRONMENTAL & OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH
CiteScore
1.50
自引率
7.70%
发文量
81
审稿时长
>12 weeks
期刊介绍: Families, Systems, & Health publishes clinical research, training, and theoretical contributions in the areas of families and health, with particular focus on collaborative family healthcare.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信