Drug-Coated Balloon-Only Strategy for De Novo Coronary Artery Disease: A Meta-analysis of Randomized Clinical Trials.

IF 3.4 4区 医学 Q2 CARDIAC & CARDIOVASCULAR SYSTEMS
Cardiovascular Therapeutics Pub Date : 2023-08-08 eCollection Date: 2023-01-01 DOI:10.1155/2023/3121601
Wenyi Zhang, Mingduo Zhang, Jinfan Tian, Min Zhang, Yuan Zhou, Xiantao Song
{"title":"Drug-Coated Balloon-Only Strategy for De Novo Coronary Artery Disease: A Meta-analysis of Randomized Clinical Trials.","authors":"Wenyi Zhang, Mingduo Zhang, Jinfan Tian, Min Zhang, Yuan Zhou, Xiantao Song","doi":"10.1155/2023/3121601","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Backgrounds: </strong>Many clinical trials have demonstrated the value of drug-coated balloons (DCB) for in-stent restenosis. However, their role in de novo lesions is not well documented. The aim of this study is to evaluate the safety and efficacy of the DCB-only strategy compared to other percutaneous coronary intervention strategies for de novo coronary lesions.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>The PubMed, Embase, Web of Science, and Cochrane Library Central Register of Controlled Trials (CENTRAL) electronic databases were searched for randomized controlled trials published up to May 6, 2023. The primary outcomes were major adverse cardiac events and late lumen loss.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>A total of eighteen trials with 3336 participants were included. Compared with drug-eluting stents, the DCB-only strategy was associated with a similar risk of major adverse cardiac events (risk ratio (RR) = 0.90; 95% confidence interval (CI): 0.59 to 1.37, <i>P</i> = 0.631) and a significant decrease in late lumen loss (standardized mean difference (SMD) = -0.29, 95% CI: -0.53 to -0.04, <i>P</i> = 0.021). This effect was consistent in subgroup analysis regardless of indication, follow-up time, drug-eluting stent type, and dual antiplatelet therapy duration. However, DCBs were inferior to DESs for minimum lumen diameter and percentage diameter stenosis. The DCB-only strategy showed significantly better outcomes for most endpoints compared to plain-old balloon angioplasty or bare metal stents.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Interventions with a DCB-only strategy are comparable to those of drug-eluting stents and superior to plain-old balloon angioplasty or bare metal stents for the treatment of selected de novo coronary lesions. Additional evidence is still warranted to confirm the value of DCB before widespread clinical utilization can be recommended.</p>","PeriodicalId":9582,"journal":{"name":"Cardiovascular Therapeutics","volume":"2023 ","pages":"3121601"},"PeriodicalIF":3.4000,"publicationDate":"2023-08-08","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10427238/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Cardiovascular Therapeutics","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1155/2023/3121601","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2023/1/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"CARDIAC & CARDIOVASCULAR SYSTEMS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Backgrounds: Many clinical trials have demonstrated the value of drug-coated balloons (DCB) for in-stent restenosis. However, their role in de novo lesions is not well documented. The aim of this study is to evaluate the safety and efficacy of the DCB-only strategy compared to other percutaneous coronary intervention strategies for de novo coronary lesions.

Methods: The PubMed, Embase, Web of Science, and Cochrane Library Central Register of Controlled Trials (CENTRAL) electronic databases were searched for randomized controlled trials published up to May 6, 2023. The primary outcomes were major adverse cardiac events and late lumen loss.

Results: A total of eighteen trials with 3336 participants were included. Compared with drug-eluting stents, the DCB-only strategy was associated with a similar risk of major adverse cardiac events (risk ratio (RR) = 0.90; 95% confidence interval (CI): 0.59 to 1.37, P = 0.631) and a significant decrease in late lumen loss (standardized mean difference (SMD) = -0.29, 95% CI: -0.53 to -0.04, P = 0.021). This effect was consistent in subgroup analysis regardless of indication, follow-up time, drug-eluting stent type, and dual antiplatelet therapy duration. However, DCBs were inferior to DESs for minimum lumen diameter and percentage diameter stenosis. The DCB-only strategy showed significantly better outcomes for most endpoints compared to plain-old balloon angioplasty or bare metal stents.

Conclusions: Interventions with a DCB-only strategy are comparable to those of drug-eluting stents and superior to plain-old balloon angioplasty or bare metal stents for the treatment of selected de novo coronary lesions. Additional evidence is still warranted to confirm the value of DCB before widespread clinical utilization can be recommended.

Abstract Image

Abstract Image

Abstract Image

治疗新发冠状动脉疾病的药物涂层球囊策略:随机临床试验的 Meta 分析。
背景:许多临床试验都证明了药物涂层球囊(DCB)对支架内再狭窄的价值。然而,它们在新发病变中的作用还没有得到很好的证实。本研究旨在评估纯药物涂层球囊策略与其他经皮冠状动脉介入策略相比,对新生冠状动脉病变的安全性和有效性:在 PubMed、Embase、Web of Science 和 Cochrane Library Central Register of Controlled Trials (CENTRAL) 电子数据库中检索了截至 2023 年 5 月 6 日发表的随机对照试验。主要结果为主要心脏不良事件和晚期管腔缺损:结果:共纳入18项试验,3336人参与。与药物洗脱支架相比,仅使用 DCB 的策略与主要不良心脏事件的风险相似(风险比 (RR) = 0.90;95% 置信区间 (CI):0.59 至 1.37,P = 0.631),而晚期管腔损失显著减少(标准化平均差 (SMD) = -0.29,95% CI:-0.53 至 -0.04,P = 0.021)。在亚组分析中,无论适应症、随访时间、药物洗脱支架类型和双联抗血小板治疗持续时间如何,这一效果都是一致的。然而,就最小管腔直径和直径狭窄百分比而言,DCB不如DES。与普通球囊血管成形术或裸金属支架相比,纯DCB策略在大多数终点上的疗效显著更好:结论:在治疗选定的新发冠状动脉病变时,仅使用DCB策略的干预效果与药物洗脱支架相当,优于普通球囊血管成形术或裸金属支架。在建议临床广泛使用之前,仍需更多证据来证实 DCB 的价值。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Cardiovascular Therapeutics
Cardiovascular Therapeutics 医学-心血管系统
CiteScore
5.60
自引率
0.00%
发文量
55
审稿时长
6 months
期刊介绍: Cardiovascular Therapeutics (formerly Cardiovascular Drug Reviews) is a peer-reviewed, Open Access journal that publishes original research and review articles focusing on cardiovascular and clinical pharmacology, as well as clinical trials of new cardiovascular therapies. Articles on translational research, pharmacogenomics and personalized medicine, device, gene and cell therapies, and pharmacoepidemiology are also encouraged. Subject areas include (but are by no means limited to): Acute coronary syndrome Arrhythmias Atherosclerosis Basic cardiac electrophysiology Cardiac catheterization Cardiac remodeling Coagulation and thrombosis Diabetic cardiovascular disease Heart failure (systolic HF, HFrEF, diastolic HF, HFpEF) Hyperlipidemia Hypertension Ischemic heart disease Vascular biology Ventricular assist devices Molecular cardio-biology Myocardial regeneration Lipoprotein metabolism Radial artery access Percutaneous coronary intervention Transcatheter aortic and mitral valve replacement.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信