Comparison of Bispectral Index Monitor Data Between Standard Frontal-Temporal Position and Alternative Nasal Dorsum Position in the Intensive Care Unit: A Pilot Study.

IF 1.5 3区 医学 Q4 CLINICAL NEUROLOGY
Jia W Romito, Folefac D Atem, Anupama Manjunath, Ailing Yang, Bryan T Romito, Sonja E Stutzman, David L McDonagh, Aardhra M Venkatachalam, Lalith Premachandra, Venkatesh Aiyagari
{"title":"Comparison of Bispectral Index Monitor Data Between Standard Frontal-Temporal Position and Alternative Nasal Dorsum Position in the Intensive Care Unit: A Pilot Study.","authors":"Jia W Romito,&nbsp;Folefac D Atem,&nbsp;Anupama Manjunath,&nbsp;Ailing Yang,&nbsp;Bryan T Romito,&nbsp;Sonja E Stutzman,&nbsp;David L McDonagh,&nbsp;Aardhra M Venkatachalam,&nbsp;Lalith Premachandra,&nbsp;Venkatesh Aiyagari","doi":"10.1097/JNN.0000000000000635","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Abstract: </strong>BACKGROUND: The Bispectral (BIS) monitor is a validated, noninvasive monitor placed over the forehead to titrate sedation in patients under general anesthesia in the operating room. In the neurocritical care unit, there is limited room on the forehead because of incisions, injuries, and other monitoring devices. This is a pilot study to determine whether a BIS nasal montage correlates to the standard frontal-temporal data in this patient population. METHODS: This prospective nonandomized pilot study enrolled 10 critically ill, intubated, and sedated adult patients admitted to the neurocritical care unit. Each patient had a BIS monitor placed over the standard frontal-temporal location and over the alternative nasal dorsum with simultaneous data collected for 24 hours. RESULTS: In the frontal-temporal location, the mean (SD) BIS score was 50.9 (15.0), average minimum BIS score was 47.0 (15.0), and average maximum BIS score was 58.4 (16.7). In the nasal dorsum location, the mean BIS score was 54.8 (21.6), average minimum BIS score was 52.8 (20.9), and average maximum BIS score was 58.0 (22.2). Baseline nonparametric tests showed nonsignificant P values for all variables except for Signal Quality Index. Generalized linear model analysis demonstrated significant differences between the 2 monitor locations (P < .0001). CONCLUSION: The results of this pilot study do not support using a BIS nasal montage as an alternative for patients in the neurocritical care unit.</p>","PeriodicalId":50113,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Neuroscience Nursing","volume":"54 1","pages":"30-34"},"PeriodicalIF":1.5000,"publicationDate":"2022-02-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Neuroscience Nursing","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1097/JNN.0000000000000635","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"CLINICAL NEUROLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Abstract: BACKGROUND: The Bispectral (BIS) monitor is a validated, noninvasive monitor placed over the forehead to titrate sedation in patients under general anesthesia in the operating room. In the neurocritical care unit, there is limited room on the forehead because of incisions, injuries, and other monitoring devices. This is a pilot study to determine whether a BIS nasal montage correlates to the standard frontal-temporal data in this patient population. METHODS: This prospective nonandomized pilot study enrolled 10 critically ill, intubated, and sedated adult patients admitted to the neurocritical care unit. Each patient had a BIS monitor placed over the standard frontal-temporal location and over the alternative nasal dorsum with simultaneous data collected for 24 hours. RESULTS: In the frontal-temporal location, the mean (SD) BIS score was 50.9 (15.0), average minimum BIS score was 47.0 (15.0), and average maximum BIS score was 58.4 (16.7). In the nasal dorsum location, the mean BIS score was 54.8 (21.6), average minimum BIS score was 52.8 (20.9), and average maximum BIS score was 58.0 (22.2). Baseline nonparametric tests showed nonsignificant P values for all variables except for Signal Quality Index. Generalized linear model analysis demonstrated significant differences between the 2 monitor locations (P < .0001). CONCLUSION: The results of this pilot study do not support using a BIS nasal montage as an alternative for patients in the neurocritical care unit.

重症监护病房标准额颞体位与鼻背体位双谱指数监测数据的比较:一项初步研究。
摘要:背景:双谱(BIS)监护仪是一种经过验证的无创监护仪,用于在手术室全麻患者额头上滴定镇静。在神经危重症监护病房,由于切口、损伤和其他监测设备,前额的空间有限。这是一项初步研究,旨在确定BIS鼻部蒙太奇是否与该患者群体的标准额颞叶数据相关。方法:这项前瞻性非随机先导研究纳入了10例危重症、插管和镇静的神经危重症监护病房的成年患者。每个患者在标准额颞部和备选鼻背处放置BIS监测仪,同时收集24小时的数据。结果:额颞部位BIS评分平均(SD)为50.9(15.0)分,平均最低BIS评分为47.0(15.0)分,平均最高BIS评分为58.4(16.7)分。在鼻背部位,平均BIS评分为54.8(21.6),平均最低BIS评分为52.8(20.9),平均最高BIS评分为58.0(22.2)。基线非参数检验显示,除信号质量指数外,所有变量的P值均不显著。广义线性模型分析显示两个监测位置之间存在显著差异(P < 0.0001)。结论:这项初步研究的结果不支持使用BIS鼻部蒙太奇作为神经危重症监护病房患者的替代方案。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Journal of Neuroscience Nursing
Journal of Neuroscience Nursing CLINICAL NEUROLOGY-NURSING
CiteScore
3.10
自引率
30.40%
发文量
110
审稿时长
>12 weeks
期刊介绍: The Journal of Neuroscience Nursing (JNN), the official journal of the American Association of Neuroscience Nurses, contains original articles on advances in neurosurgical and neurological techniques as they affect nursing care, theory and research, as well as commentary on the roles of the neuroscience nurse in the health care team. The journal provides information to nurses and health care professionals working in diverse areas of neuroscience patient care such as multi-specialty and neuroscience intensive care units, general neuroscience units, combination units (neuro/ortho, neuromuscular/rehabilitation, neuropsychiatry, neurogerontology), rehabilitation units, medical-surgical units, pediatric units, emergency and trauma departments, and surgery. The information is applicable to professionals working in clinical, research, administrative, and educational settings.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信