Experience With Trauma-Induced ARDS: A Retrospective Study of US Wartime Casualties 2003-2015.

Q3 Medicine
Jason J Nam, Matthew S McCravy, Krista L Haines, Sarah B Thomas, James K Aden, Luke R Johnston, Phillip E Mason, Jennifer M Gurney, Valerie G Sams
{"title":"Experience With Trauma-Induced ARDS: A Retrospective Study of US Wartime Casualties 2003-2015.","authors":"Jason J Nam, Matthew S McCravy, Krista L Haines, Sarah B Thomas, James K Aden, Luke R Johnston, Phillip E Mason, Jennifer M Gurney, Valerie G Sams","doi":"10.55460/MTVH-ONCM","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>The purpose of our study was to assess risks/ outcomes of acute respiratory distress syndrome (ARDS) in US combat casualties. We hypothesized that combat trauma patients with ARDS would have worse outcomes based on mechanism of injury (MOI) and labs/vital signs aberrancies.</p><p><strong>Materials and methods: </strong>We reviewed data on military Servicemembers serving in Iraq and Afghanistan from 1 January 2003 to 31 December 2015 diagnosed with ARDS by ICD-9 code. We extracted patient demographics, injury specifics, and mortality from the Department of Defense Trauma Registry (DoDTR).</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The most common MOI was an explosion, accounting for 67.6% of all injuries. Nonsurvivors were more likely to have explosion-related injuries, have higher injury severity score (ISS), higher international normalized ratio (INR), lower platelet count, greater base deficit, lower temperature, lower Glasgow Coma Scale (GCS) score, and lower pH. There was no significant difference in deaths across time.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>By identifying characteristics of patients with higher mortality in trauma ARDS, we can develop treatment guidelines to improve outcomes. Given the high mortality associated with trauma ARDS and relative paucity of clinical data available, we need to improve battlefield data capture to better guide practice and ultimately improve care. The management of ARDS will be increasingly relevant in prolonged casualty care (PCC; formerly prolonged field care) on the modern battlefield.</p>","PeriodicalId":53630,"journal":{"name":"Journal of special operations medicine : a peer reviewed journal for SOF medical professionals","volume":"22 4","pages":"111-116"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-12-16","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of special operations medicine : a peer reviewed journal for SOF medical professionals","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.55460/MTVH-ONCM","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"Medicine","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: The purpose of our study was to assess risks/ outcomes of acute respiratory distress syndrome (ARDS) in US combat casualties. We hypothesized that combat trauma patients with ARDS would have worse outcomes based on mechanism of injury (MOI) and labs/vital signs aberrancies.

Materials and methods: We reviewed data on military Servicemembers serving in Iraq and Afghanistan from 1 January 2003 to 31 December 2015 diagnosed with ARDS by ICD-9 code. We extracted patient demographics, injury specifics, and mortality from the Department of Defense Trauma Registry (DoDTR).

Results: The most common MOI was an explosion, accounting for 67.6% of all injuries. Nonsurvivors were more likely to have explosion-related injuries, have higher injury severity score (ISS), higher international normalized ratio (INR), lower platelet count, greater base deficit, lower temperature, lower Glasgow Coma Scale (GCS) score, and lower pH. There was no significant difference in deaths across time.

Conclusion: By identifying characteristics of patients with higher mortality in trauma ARDS, we can develop treatment guidelines to improve outcomes. Given the high mortality associated with trauma ARDS and relative paucity of clinical data available, we need to improve battlefield data capture to better guide practice and ultimately improve care. The management of ARDS will be increasingly relevant in prolonged casualty care (PCC; formerly prolonged field care) on the modern battlefield.

创伤性ARDS的经验:2003-2015年美国战时伤亡回顾性研究
背景:本研究的目的是评估美军战斗伤亡者急性呼吸窘迫综合征(ARDS)的风险/结果。基于损伤机制(MOI)和实验室/生命体征异常,我们假设战斗创伤合并ARDS患者预后较差。材料和方法:我们回顾了2003年1月1日至2015年12月31日在伊拉克和阿富汗服役的军人的数据,这些军人被ICD-9编码诊断为ARDS。我们从国防部创伤登记处(DoDTR)中提取了患者人口统计数据、损伤细节和死亡率。结果:最常见的MOI是爆炸,占所有伤害的67.6%。非幸存者更有可能发生爆炸相关损伤,损伤严重程度评分(ISS)较高,国际标准化比率(INR)较高,血小板计数较低,碱基缺陷较大,体温较低,格拉斯哥昏迷量表(GCS)评分较低,ph值较低。各时间点的死亡率无显著差异。结论:通过识别创伤性ARDS高死亡率患者的特征,我们可以制定治疗指南以改善预后。鉴于创伤性急性呼吸窘迫综合征的高死亡率和临床数据的相对缺乏,我们需要改进战场数据采集,以更好地指导实践并最终改善护理。急性呼吸窘迫综合征(ARDS)的管理与长期伤亡者护理(PCC;在现代战场上(以前称为长时间野战)。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
1.30
自引率
0.00%
发文量
91
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信