Gross myofascial release of trunk with leg pull technique on low back pain with radiculopathy - A randomised controlled trial.

Pub Date : 2023-06-01 Epub Date: 2023-03-31 DOI:10.1142/S1013702523500087
Abey P Rajan, Peeyoosha Gurudut
{"title":"Gross myofascial release of trunk with leg pull technique on low back pain with radiculopathy - A randomised controlled trial.","authors":"Abey P Rajan,&nbsp;Peeyoosha Gurudut","doi":"10.1142/S1013702523500087","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Lower Back Pain (LBP) with radiculopathy is a potentially more serious form of mechanical low back pain. A paucity of literature exists about the effect of the gross myofascial release (MFR) technique on the management of LBP.</p><p><strong>Objective: </strong>The study aimed to evaluate the effect of gross MFR when given as an adjunct to conventional physical therapy in subjects with low back pain with radiculopathy.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Forty subjects (<math><mi>n</mi><mo>=</mo><mn>40</mn></math>) clinically diagnosed with LBP with radiculopathy were enrolled and randomly allocated to either the control group (<math><mi>n</mi><mo>=</mo><mn>20</mn></math>) or the experimental group (<math><mi>n</mi><mo>=</mo><mn>20</mn></math>). Both study groups received 5 sessions of intervention. The control group received conventional physical therapy while the experimental group received gross MFR of the trunk and lower limb along with conventional physical therapy. The outcome measures included were pressure pain threshold for the lower back and lower extremity, lumbar flexion and extension range of motion (ROM), percentage disability, and patient satisfaction towards the treatment which were measured pre-intervention (day 1) and post-treatment (day 5). The interaction between group and time was analysed using two-way mixed ANOVA.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The results suggested that the experimental group was statistically significant over the control group in terms of pressure pain threshold in the lower back (<math><mi>p</mi><mo><</mo><mn>0</mn><mo>.</mo><mn>001</mn></math>) and lower limb (<math><mi>p</mi><mo>=</mo><mn>0</mn><mo>.</mo><mn>003</mn></math>), disability (<math><mi>p</mi><mo><</mo><mn>0</mn><mo>.</mo><mn>001</mn></math>), and patient satisfaction (<math><mi>p</mi><mo>=</mo><mn>0</mn><mo>.</mo><mn>034</mn></math>) and lumbar flexion (<math><mi>p</mi><mo>=</mo><mn>0</mn><mo>.</mo><mn>002</mn></math>) except lumbar extension ROM (<math><mi>p</mi><mo>=</mo><mn>0</mn><mo>.</mo><mn>973</mn></math>).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>When given as an adjuvant to conventional physical therapy, gross myofascial release proved to provide a significant and faster short-term improvement over conventional treatment alone in subjects diagnosed with low back pain with radiculopathy.</p>","PeriodicalId":0,"journal":{"name":"","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2023-06-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://ftp.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pub/pmc/oa_pdf/06/f4/hkpj-43-061.PMC10423682.pdf","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1142/S1013702523500087","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2023/3/31 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Lower Back Pain (LBP) with radiculopathy is a potentially more serious form of mechanical low back pain. A paucity of literature exists about the effect of the gross myofascial release (MFR) technique on the management of LBP.

Objective: The study aimed to evaluate the effect of gross MFR when given as an adjunct to conventional physical therapy in subjects with low back pain with radiculopathy.

Methods: Forty subjects (n=40) clinically diagnosed with LBP with radiculopathy were enrolled and randomly allocated to either the control group (n=20) or the experimental group (n=20). Both study groups received 5 sessions of intervention. The control group received conventional physical therapy while the experimental group received gross MFR of the trunk and lower limb along with conventional physical therapy. The outcome measures included were pressure pain threshold for the lower back and lower extremity, lumbar flexion and extension range of motion (ROM), percentage disability, and patient satisfaction towards the treatment which were measured pre-intervention (day 1) and post-treatment (day 5). The interaction between group and time was analysed using two-way mixed ANOVA.

Results: The results suggested that the experimental group was statistically significant over the control group in terms of pressure pain threshold in the lower back (p<0.001) and lower limb (p=0.003), disability (p<0.001), and patient satisfaction (p=0.034) and lumbar flexion (p=0.002) except lumbar extension ROM (p=0.973).

Conclusion: When given as an adjuvant to conventional physical therapy, gross myofascial release proved to provide a significant and faster short-term improvement over conventional treatment alone in subjects diagnosed with low back pain with radiculopathy.

Abstract Image

Abstract Image

Abstract Image

分享
查看原文
躯干粗肌筋膜松解配合腿拉技术治疗伴有神经根病的腰痛-一项随机对照试验。
背景:伴有神经根病的下背痛(LBP)是一种潜在的更严重的机械性下背痛。关于总肌筋膜松解(MFR)技术在LBP治疗中的作用的文献很少。目的:本研究旨在评估总肌筋膜松解作为常规物理治疗的辅助药物对患有神经根病的腰痛患者的效果。方法:40名临床诊断为LBP伴神经根病的受试者(n=40)被纳入研究,并随机分配到对照组(n=20)或实验组(n=2 0)。两个研究组都接受了5次干预。对照组接受常规物理治疗,而实验组在常规物理治疗的同时接受躯干和下肢的大体MFR。结果指标包括下背部和下肢的压痛阈值、腰椎屈伸活动范围(ROM)、残疾百分比和患者对治疗的满意度,这些指标在干预前(第1天)和治疗后(第5天)进行了测量。结果:实验组在下背部和下肢的压痛阈值(p0.001)、残疾(p0.001,以及患者满意度(p=0.034)和腰椎屈曲(p=0.002),但腰椎伸展ROM除外(p=0.073)。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信