Huilin Xu , Aoshen Wu , He Ren , Chenghang Yu , Gang Liu , Lei Liu
{"title":"Classification of colorectal cancer consensus molecular subtypes using attention-based multi-instance learning network on whole-slide images","authors":"Huilin Xu , Aoshen Wu , He Ren , Chenghang Yu , Gang Liu , Lei Liu","doi":"10.1016/j.acthis.2023.152057","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>Colorectal cancer (CRC) is the third most common and second most lethal cancer globally. It is highly heterogeneous with different clinical-pathological characteristics, prognostic status, and therapy responses. Thus, the precise diagnosis of CRC subtypes is of great significance for improving the prognosis and survival of CRC patients. Nowadays, the most commonly used molecular-level CRC classification system is the Consensus Molecular Subtypes (CMSs). In this study, we applied a weakly supervised deep learning method, named attention-based multi-instance learning (MIL), on formalin-fixed paraffin-embedded (FFPE) whole-slide images (WSIs) to distinguish CMS1 subtype from CMS2, CMS3, and CMS4 subtypes, as well as distinguish CMS4 from CMS1, CMS2, and CMS3 subtypes. The advantage of MIL is training a bag of the tiled instance with bag-level labels only. Our experiment was performed on 1218 WSIs obtained from The Cancer Genome Atlas (TCGA). We constructed three convolutional neural network-based structures for model training and evaluated the ability of the max-pooling operator and mean-pooling operator on aggregating bag-level scores. The results showed that the 3-layer model achieved the best performance in both comparison groups. When compared CMS1 with CMS234, max-pooling reached the ACC of 83.86 % and the mean-pooling operator reached the AUC of 0.731. While comparing CMS4 with CMS123, mean-pooling reached the ACC of 74.26 % and max-pooling reached the AUC of 0.609. Our results implied that WSIs could be utilized to classify CMSs, and manual pixel-level annotation is not a necessity for computational pathology imaging analysis.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":6961,"journal":{"name":"Acta histochemica","volume":"125 6","pages":"Article 152057"},"PeriodicalIF":2.3000,"publicationDate":"2023-08-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Acta histochemica","FirstCategoryId":"99","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0065128123000636","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"生物学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"CELL BIOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Colorectal cancer (CRC) is the third most common and second most lethal cancer globally. It is highly heterogeneous with different clinical-pathological characteristics, prognostic status, and therapy responses. Thus, the precise diagnosis of CRC subtypes is of great significance for improving the prognosis and survival of CRC patients. Nowadays, the most commonly used molecular-level CRC classification system is the Consensus Molecular Subtypes (CMSs). In this study, we applied a weakly supervised deep learning method, named attention-based multi-instance learning (MIL), on formalin-fixed paraffin-embedded (FFPE) whole-slide images (WSIs) to distinguish CMS1 subtype from CMS2, CMS3, and CMS4 subtypes, as well as distinguish CMS4 from CMS1, CMS2, and CMS3 subtypes. The advantage of MIL is training a bag of the tiled instance with bag-level labels only. Our experiment was performed on 1218 WSIs obtained from The Cancer Genome Atlas (TCGA). We constructed three convolutional neural network-based structures for model training and evaluated the ability of the max-pooling operator and mean-pooling operator on aggregating bag-level scores. The results showed that the 3-layer model achieved the best performance in both comparison groups. When compared CMS1 with CMS234, max-pooling reached the ACC of 83.86 % and the mean-pooling operator reached the AUC of 0.731. While comparing CMS4 with CMS123, mean-pooling reached the ACC of 74.26 % and max-pooling reached the AUC of 0.609. Our results implied that WSIs could be utilized to classify CMSs, and manual pixel-level annotation is not a necessity for computational pathology imaging analysis.
期刊介绍:
Acta histochemica, a journal of structural biochemistry of cells and tissues, publishes original research articles, short communications, reviews, letters to the editor, meeting reports and abstracts of meetings. The aim of the journal is to provide a forum for the cytochemical and histochemical research community in the life sciences, including cell biology, biotechnology, neurobiology, immunobiology, pathology, pharmacology, botany, zoology and environmental and toxicological research. The journal focuses on new developments in cytochemistry and histochemistry and their applications. Manuscripts reporting on studies of living cells and tissues are particularly welcome. Understanding the complexity of cells and tissues, i.e. their biocomplexity and biodiversity, is a major goal of the journal and reports on this topic are especially encouraged. Original research articles, short communications and reviews that report on new developments in cytochemistry and histochemistry are welcomed, especially when molecular biology is combined with the use of advanced microscopical techniques including image analysis and cytometry. Letters to the editor should comment or interpret previously published articles in the journal to trigger scientific discussions. Meeting reports are considered to be very important publications in the journal because they are excellent opportunities to present state-of-the-art overviews of fields in research where the developments are fast and hard to follow. Authors of meeting reports should consult the editors before writing a report. The editorial policy of the editors and the editorial board is rapid publication. Once a manuscript is received by one of the editors, an editorial decision about acceptance, revision or rejection will be taken within a month. It is the aim of the publishers to have a manuscript published within three months after the manuscript has been accepted