Comparing the Safety and Efficacy of Intraluminal Brachytherapy vs Isolated Percutaneous Transhepatic Biliary Drainage with internalization for Unresectable Malignant Biliary Obstruction: A Prospective Observational Study.

Q1 Medicine
Shikha Sood, John V Alexander, Manish Gupta, Ashish Chauhan
{"title":"Comparing the Safety and Efficacy of Intraluminal Brachytherapy vs Isolated Percutaneous Transhepatic Biliary Drainage with internalization for Unresectable Malignant Biliary Obstruction: A Prospective Observational Study.","authors":"Shikha Sood,&nbsp;John V Alexander,&nbsp;Manish Gupta,&nbsp;Ashish Chauhan","doi":"10.56875/2589-0646.1092","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background and objectives: </strong>Intraluminal therapies, including brachytherapy, can locally destroy obstructing tumors and increase the duration of catheter/stent patency in patients with unresectable malignant biliary obstruction (MBO). In this prospective observational study, the safety and efficacy of percutaneous transhepatic biliary drainage (PTBD) followed by HDR intraluminal brachytherapy (ILBT) in the palliative treatment of malignant biliary obstruction was evaluated.</p><p><strong>Patients and methods: </strong>In total, 66 MBO patients (January 2021 to March 2022) who were unfit for alternate treatment modalities were enrolled in our study and underwent percutaneous transhepatic biliary drainage (PTBD) with internalization. Additionally, 11 patients underwent subsequent ILBT, which was administered over two sessions (800 cGy each session, one week apart) with iridium-192 prescribed at 1.5 cmfrom the central axis of the catheter via a percutaneous biliary catheter. The second session was followed up by endoluminal stenting in the same sitting. Patients with an Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group (ECOG) status <4 and a 50% decline in bilirubin/<5 mg/dL on day 10 after PTBD were selected for ILBT. The biliary stent/catheter patency period, survival duration, mean bilirubin level (mg/dL) decline, and incidence of complications were evaluated.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Among the sixty-six patients included and classified into ILBT or PTBD-only groups, the median survival period for the ILBT group vs PTBD group was 172 (84.5-273.5) days vs 45 (30.75-83) days (p ≤ 0.0001) with an overall survival (OS) at 6 months of 62.34% vs 3.64% (p ≤ 0.0001). The stent/catheter patency period of the ILBT group in comparison to the PTBD group was 172 (83-273.5) days vs 30 (20-42.5) days (p ≤ 0.0001). No major treatment-related complications were observed in any of the patients.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>ILBT with stenting is a safe option for improving stent patency and survival duration with minimal complications with the condition that patients are carefully selected.</p>","PeriodicalId":39226,"journal":{"name":"Hematology/ Oncology and Stem Cell Therapy","volume":"17 1","pages":"21-28"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-07-20","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Hematology/ Oncology and Stem Cell Therapy","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.56875/2589-0646.1092","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"Medicine","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background and objectives: Intraluminal therapies, including brachytherapy, can locally destroy obstructing tumors and increase the duration of catheter/stent patency in patients with unresectable malignant biliary obstruction (MBO). In this prospective observational study, the safety and efficacy of percutaneous transhepatic biliary drainage (PTBD) followed by HDR intraluminal brachytherapy (ILBT) in the palliative treatment of malignant biliary obstruction was evaluated.

Patients and methods: In total, 66 MBO patients (January 2021 to March 2022) who were unfit for alternate treatment modalities were enrolled in our study and underwent percutaneous transhepatic biliary drainage (PTBD) with internalization. Additionally, 11 patients underwent subsequent ILBT, which was administered over two sessions (800 cGy each session, one week apart) with iridium-192 prescribed at 1.5 cmfrom the central axis of the catheter via a percutaneous biliary catheter. The second session was followed up by endoluminal stenting in the same sitting. Patients with an Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group (ECOG) status <4 and a 50% decline in bilirubin/<5 mg/dL on day 10 after PTBD were selected for ILBT. The biliary stent/catheter patency period, survival duration, mean bilirubin level (mg/dL) decline, and incidence of complications were evaluated.

Results: Among the sixty-six patients included and classified into ILBT or PTBD-only groups, the median survival period for the ILBT group vs PTBD group was 172 (84.5-273.5) days vs 45 (30.75-83) days (p ≤ 0.0001) with an overall survival (OS) at 6 months of 62.34% vs 3.64% (p ≤ 0.0001). The stent/catheter patency period of the ILBT group in comparison to the PTBD group was 172 (83-273.5) days vs 30 (20-42.5) days (p ≤ 0.0001). No major treatment-related complications were observed in any of the patients.

Conclusions: ILBT with stenting is a safe option for improving stent patency and survival duration with minimal complications with the condition that patients are carefully selected.

一项前瞻性观察研究:比较腔内近距离治疗与单独经皮经肝胆道内引流治疗不可切除的恶性胆道梗阻的安全性和有效性。
背景和目的:对于不可切除的恶性胆道梗阻(MBO)患者,包括近距离治疗在内的腔内治疗可以局部破坏梗阻肿瘤,增加导管/支架的开放时间。本前瞻性观察研究评价经皮经肝胆道引流(PTBD)联合HDR腔内近距离放射治疗(ILBT)姑息性治疗恶性胆道梗阻的安全性和有效性。患者和方法:共有66例不适合替代治疗方式的MBO患者(2021年1月至2022年3月)纳入我们的研究,并接受了经皮经肝胆道引流术(PTBD)并内化。此外,11名患者接受了后续的ILBT治疗,治疗分两个疗程(每次800 cGy,间隔一周),并通过经皮胆管在距导管中轴线1.5厘米处处方铱-192。第二次会议在同一坐位进行腔内支架置入。结果:在纳入的66例患者中,分为ILBT或PTBD组,ILBT组与PTBD组的中位生存期分别为172(84.5-273.5)天和45(30.75-83)天(p≤0.0001),6个月总生存率(OS)为62.34% vs 3.64% (p≤0.0001)。与PTBD组相比,ILBT组支架/导管通畅时间为172(83-273.5)天,而PTBD组为30(20-42.5)天(p≤0.0001)。所有患者均未出现重大治疗相关并发症。结论:在精心选择患者的情况下,ILBT联合支架置入是一种安全的选择,可以提高支架通畅度和生存时间,并发症最少。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
4.30
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
审稿时长
27 weeks
期刊介绍: Hematology Oncology and Stem Cell Therapy is an international, peer-reviewed, open access journal that provides a vehicle for publications of high-quality clinical as well as basic science research reports in hematology and oncology. The contents of the journal also emphasize the growing importance of hematopoietic stem cell therapy for treatment of various benign and malignant hematologic disorders and certain solid tumors.The journal prioritizes publication of original research articles but also would give consideration for brief reports, review articles, special communications, and unique case reports. It also offers a special section for clinically relevant images that provide an important educational value.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信