精神分裂症和甲基苯丙胺所致精神病患者与健康对照的认知功能比较

Mahin Eslami Shahrbabaki, Delaram Barfehie, Shahrzad Mazhari, Atefeh Ahmadi, Shahideh Shafiee
{"title":"精神分裂症和甲基苯丙胺所致精神病患者与健康对照的认知功能比较","authors":"Mahin Eslami Shahrbabaki,&nbsp;Delaram Barfehie,&nbsp;Shahrzad Mazhari,&nbsp;Atefeh Ahmadi,&nbsp;Shahideh Shafiee","doi":"10.34172/ahj.2022.1143","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>There are similar findings about the similarities and differences of cognitive dysfunctions in patients with schizophrenia and methamphetamine-induced psychosis (MIP). This study aimed to compare cognitive functioning in schizophrenia and MIP patients, using a performance-based cognitive assessment battery and an interview-based assessment of cognition.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Three groups participated in this study including, (a) 30 patients with MIP, (b) 30 patients with schizophrenia, and (c) 30 healthy individuals. All participants received the Brief Assessment of Cognition in Schizophrenia (BACS), a standardized performance-based cognitive battery, the Schizophrenia Cognition Rating Scale (SCoRS), and the interview-based assessment of cognition.</p><p><strong>Findings: </strong>Both groups of patients with schizophrenia and MIP performed poorly on all the BACS cognitive domains compared with the healthy controls. The two patient groups were significantly different on the three BACS subscales including verbal fluency, verbal memory, and speed of information processing. Schizophrenia patients performed worse than the MIP group concerning these three subscales. However, the two patient groups were similar in executive function, working memory, and motor speed. Moreover, the SCoRS-informant, SCoRS-global, and PANSS-negative significantly differed between schizophrenia and MIP patients.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Although cognitive dysfunctions are mostly similar in patients with MIP and schizophrenia, there are some differences especially in the functions related to prefrontal and temporal lobes.</p>","PeriodicalId":33943,"journal":{"name":"Addiction and Health","volume":"14 4","pages":"239-243"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-10-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://ftp.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pub/pmc/oa_pdf/a3/7d/ahj-14-239.PMC10408749.pdf","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Comparing Cognitive Functions in Patients with Schizophrenia and Methamphetamine-Induced Psychosis with Healthy Controls.\",\"authors\":\"Mahin Eslami Shahrbabaki,&nbsp;Delaram Barfehie,&nbsp;Shahrzad Mazhari,&nbsp;Atefeh Ahmadi,&nbsp;Shahideh Shafiee\",\"doi\":\"10.34172/ahj.2022.1143\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Background: </strong>There are similar findings about the similarities and differences of cognitive dysfunctions in patients with schizophrenia and methamphetamine-induced psychosis (MIP). This study aimed to compare cognitive functioning in schizophrenia and MIP patients, using a performance-based cognitive assessment battery and an interview-based assessment of cognition.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Three groups participated in this study including, (a) 30 patients with MIP, (b) 30 patients with schizophrenia, and (c) 30 healthy individuals. All participants received the Brief Assessment of Cognition in Schizophrenia (BACS), a standardized performance-based cognitive battery, the Schizophrenia Cognition Rating Scale (SCoRS), and the interview-based assessment of cognition.</p><p><strong>Findings: </strong>Both groups of patients with schizophrenia and MIP performed poorly on all the BACS cognitive domains compared with the healthy controls. The two patient groups were significantly different on the three BACS subscales including verbal fluency, verbal memory, and speed of information processing. Schizophrenia patients performed worse than the MIP group concerning these three subscales. However, the two patient groups were similar in executive function, working memory, and motor speed. Moreover, the SCoRS-informant, SCoRS-global, and PANSS-negative significantly differed between schizophrenia and MIP patients.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Although cognitive dysfunctions are mostly similar in patients with MIP and schizophrenia, there are some differences especially in the functions related to prefrontal and temporal lobes.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":33943,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Addiction and Health\",\"volume\":\"14 4\",\"pages\":\"239-243\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2022-10-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://ftp.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pub/pmc/oa_pdf/a3/7d/ahj-14-239.PMC10408749.pdf\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Addiction and Health\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.34172/ahj.2022.1143\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Addiction and Health","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.34172/ahj.2022.1143","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

背景:关于精神分裂症和甲基苯丙胺性精神病(MIP)患者认知功能障碍的异同,已有类似的研究结果。本研究旨在比较精神分裂症和MIP患者的认知功能,采用基于表现的认知评估组和基于访谈的认知评估。方法:本研究分为三组,(a) 30例MIP患者,(b) 30例精神分裂症患者,(c) 30例健康人。所有参与者都接受了精神分裂症认知简要评估(BACS)、标准化的基于表现的认知测试、精神分裂症认知评定量表(SCoRS)和基于访谈的认知评估。结果:与健康对照组相比,两组精神分裂症和MIP患者在所有BACS认知领域的表现都较差。两组患者在言语流畅性、言语记忆和信息处理速度三个BACS分量表上存在显著差异。精神分裂症患者在这三个分量表上的表现比MIP组差。然而,两组患者在执行功能、工作记忆和运动速度上是相似的。此外,精神分裂症患者和MIP患者的score -informant、SCoRS-global和PANSS-negative存在显著差异。结论:MIP患者与精神分裂症患者的认知功能障碍大体相似,但在前额叶和颞叶相关功能方面存在一定差异。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Comparing Cognitive Functions in Patients with Schizophrenia and Methamphetamine-Induced Psychosis with Healthy Controls.

Background: There are similar findings about the similarities and differences of cognitive dysfunctions in patients with schizophrenia and methamphetamine-induced psychosis (MIP). This study aimed to compare cognitive functioning in schizophrenia and MIP patients, using a performance-based cognitive assessment battery and an interview-based assessment of cognition.

Methods: Three groups participated in this study including, (a) 30 patients with MIP, (b) 30 patients with schizophrenia, and (c) 30 healthy individuals. All participants received the Brief Assessment of Cognition in Schizophrenia (BACS), a standardized performance-based cognitive battery, the Schizophrenia Cognition Rating Scale (SCoRS), and the interview-based assessment of cognition.

Findings: Both groups of patients with schizophrenia and MIP performed poorly on all the BACS cognitive domains compared with the healthy controls. The two patient groups were significantly different on the three BACS subscales including verbal fluency, verbal memory, and speed of information processing. Schizophrenia patients performed worse than the MIP group concerning these three subscales. However, the two patient groups were similar in executive function, working memory, and motor speed. Moreover, the SCoRS-informant, SCoRS-global, and PANSS-negative significantly differed between schizophrenia and MIP patients.

Conclusion: Although cognitive dysfunctions are mostly similar in patients with MIP and schizophrenia, there are some differences especially in the functions related to prefrontal and temporal lobes.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
3
审稿时长
10 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信