减肥手术改善了肾移植的可及性,并且在肾功能衰竭和移植后是安全的:一项系统回顾和荟萃分析

IF 3.6 2区 医学 Q2 IMMUNOLOGY
Sherwin Fernando , Jonny Varma , Fungai Dengu , Vinod Menon , Shafi Malik , John O'Callaghan
{"title":"减肥手术改善了肾移植的可及性,并且在肾功能衰竭和移植后是安全的:一项系统回顾和荟萃分析","authors":"Sherwin Fernando ,&nbsp;Jonny Varma ,&nbsp;Fungai Dengu ,&nbsp;Vinod Menon ,&nbsp;Shafi Malik ,&nbsp;John O'Callaghan","doi":"10.1016/j.trre.2023.100777","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Introduction</h3><p><span><span>Effective workup and listing of end-stage renal disease (ESRD) patients for renal transplantation, often with multiple co-morbidities, poses a challenge for transplant teams. Obesity is a common co-morbidity associated with </span>adverse outcomes<span><span> in ESRD and kidney transplant (KT) recipients. </span>Bariatric<span><span> and metabolic surgery (BMS) has long been established as a safe and effective treatment for </span>morbid obesity. In this study, the authors aimed to evaluate the strength of evidence for both the efficacy and safety of </span></span></span>bariatric surgery<span> in patients with ESRD or kidney transplantation.</span></p></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><p>A literature search was performed using key terms including “transplantation”, “kidney”, “renal”, “obesity”, and “bariatric”. Databases searched include MEDLINE, EMBASE and Web of Science from inception to date (April 2021). Methodological quality was assessed using the Newcastle-Ottawa tool. Selected articles were then categorised into patients awaiting waiting list acceptance, patients awaiting transplantation, patients undergoing simultaneous BMS + KT and patients undergoing BMS following a previous renal transplant. Summary effects are presented with a level of statistical significance and 95% Confidence Intervals.</p></div><div><h3>Results</h3><p>A total of 28 articles were selected following the literature search. Fourteen studies on patients awaiting listing (<em>n</em> = 1903), nine on patients on the KT waiting list (<em>n</em> = 196), a single study on simultaneous BMS and KT and ten studies on patients undergoing BMS following KT (<em>n</em><span> = 198). Mean change in BMI for patients awaiting listing was −11.3 kg/m</span><sup>2</sup> (95%CI: −15.3 to −7.3, <em>p</em> &lt; 0.001), mean change in BMI for patients listed for KT was −11.2 kg/m 2(95%CI: −12.9 to −9.5, p 0.001) and mean change for patients with prior KT was −11.0 kg/m<sup>2</sup> (95%CI: −7.09 to −14.9, <em>p</em> &lt; 0.001). The combined mortality rate for patients who had undergone both BMS and KT was 4% (<em>n</em> = 15).</p></div><div><h3>Discussion</h3><p>This review demonstrates BMS is both safe and efficacious in patients with ESRD prior to KT and in those post KT. It would enable difficult-to-list obese recipients the possibility to undergo transplantation and should be considered as part of the work up process.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":48973,"journal":{"name":"Transplantation Reviews","volume":"37 3","pages":"Article 100777"},"PeriodicalIF":3.6000,"publicationDate":"2023-07-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Bariatric surgery improves access to renal transplantation and is safe in renal failure as well as after transplantation: A systematic review and meta-analysis\",\"authors\":\"Sherwin Fernando ,&nbsp;Jonny Varma ,&nbsp;Fungai Dengu ,&nbsp;Vinod Menon ,&nbsp;Shafi Malik ,&nbsp;John O'Callaghan\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.trre.2023.100777\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><h3>Introduction</h3><p><span><span>Effective workup and listing of end-stage renal disease (ESRD) patients for renal transplantation, often with multiple co-morbidities, poses a challenge for transplant teams. Obesity is a common co-morbidity associated with </span>adverse outcomes<span><span> in ESRD and kidney transplant (KT) recipients. </span>Bariatric<span><span> and metabolic surgery (BMS) has long been established as a safe and effective treatment for </span>morbid obesity. In this study, the authors aimed to evaluate the strength of evidence for both the efficacy and safety of </span></span></span>bariatric surgery<span> in patients with ESRD or kidney transplantation.</span></p></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><p>A literature search was performed using key terms including “transplantation”, “kidney”, “renal”, “obesity”, and “bariatric”. Databases searched include MEDLINE, EMBASE and Web of Science from inception to date (April 2021). Methodological quality was assessed using the Newcastle-Ottawa tool. Selected articles were then categorised into patients awaiting waiting list acceptance, patients awaiting transplantation, patients undergoing simultaneous BMS + KT and patients undergoing BMS following a previous renal transplant. Summary effects are presented with a level of statistical significance and 95% Confidence Intervals.</p></div><div><h3>Results</h3><p>A total of 28 articles were selected following the literature search. Fourteen studies on patients awaiting listing (<em>n</em> = 1903), nine on patients on the KT waiting list (<em>n</em> = 196), a single study on simultaneous BMS and KT and ten studies on patients undergoing BMS following KT (<em>n</em><span> = 198). Mean change in BMI for patients awaiting listing was −11.3 kg/m</span><sup>2</sup> (95%CI: −15.3 to −7.3, <em>p</em> &lt; 0.001), mean change in BMI for patients listed for KT was −11.2 kg/m 2(95%CI: −12.9 to −9.5, p 0.001) and mean change for patients with prior KT was −11.0 kg/m<sup>2</sup> (95%CI: −7.09 to −14.9, <em>p</em> &lt; 0.001). The combined mortality rate for patients who had undergone both BMS and KT was 4% (<em>n</em> = 15).</p></div><div><h3>Discussion</h3><p>This review demonstrates BMS is both safe and efficacious in patients with ESRD prior to KT and in those post KT. It would enable difficult-to-list obese recipients the possibility to undergo transplantation and should be considered as part of the work up process.</p></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":48973,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Transplantation Reviews\",\"volume\":\"37 3\",\"pages\":\"Article 100777\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":3.6000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-07-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Transplantation Reviews\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0955470X23000319\",\"RegionNum\":2,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"IMMUNOLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Transplantation Reviews","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0955470X23000319","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"IMMUNOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

引言肾移植的终末期肾病(ESRD)患者的有效检查和名单,通常有多种合并症,对移植团队来说是一个挑战。在ESRD和肾移植(KT)受者中,肥胖是一种常见的与不良结果相关的合并发病率。长期以来,减肥和代谢手术(BMS)一直被认为是治疗病态肥胖的安全有效的方法。在这项研究中,作者旨在评估ESRD或肾移植患者进行减肥手术的有效性和安全性的证据强度。方法采用“移植”、“肾”、“肾脏”、“肥胖”和“减肥”等关键词进行文献检索。搜索的数据库包括MEDLINE、EMBASE和Web of Science,从成立至今(2021年4月)。使用Newcastle Ottawa工具评估方法学质量。然后将选定的文章分为等待接受等待名单的患者、等待移植的患者、同时接受BMS+KT的患者和之前肾移植后接受BMS的患者。摘要效应具有统计学显著性和95%置信区间。结果在文献检索后共选择了28篇文章。14项关于等待列入名单的患者的研究(n=1903),9项关于KT等待名单上的患者(n=196),一项关于同时进行BMS和KT的研究,以及10项关于在KT后进行BMS的患者的调查(n=198)。等待上市的患者的BMI平均变化为−11.3 kg/m2(95%置信区间:−15.3至−7.3,p<0.001),KT患者的BMI平均变化为−11.2 kg/m2(95%可信区间:−12.9至−9.5,p 0.001),既往有KT的患者的BMI变化为−11.0 kg/m2(95%CI:−7.09至−14.9,p<0.001)。同时接受BMS和KT治疗的患者的总死亡率为4%(n=15)对于KT和KT后的患者。这将使肥胖接受者有可能接受移植,这将被视为准备过程的一部分。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Bariatric surgery improves access to renal transplantation and is safe in renal failure as well as after transplantation: A systematic review and meta-analysis

Introduction

Effective workup and listing of end-stage renal disease (ESRD) patients for renal transplantation, often with multiple co-morbidities, poses a challenge for transplant teams. Obesity is a common co-morbidity associated with adverse outcomes in ESRD and kidney transplant (KT) recipients. Bariatric and metabolic surgery (BMS) has long been established as a safe and effective treatment for morbid obesity. In this study, the authors aimed to evaluate the strength of evidence for both the efficacy and safety of bariatric surgery in patients with ESRD or kidney transplantation.

Methods

A literature search was performed using key terms including “transplantation”, “kidney”, “renal”, “obesity”, and “bariatric”. Databases searched include MEDLINE, EMBASE and Web of Science from inception to date (April 2021). Methodological quality was assessed using the Newcastle-Ottawa tool. Selected articles were then categorised into patients awaiting waiting list acceptance, patients awaiting transplantation, patients undergoing simultaneous BMS + KT and patients undergoing BMS following a previous renal transplant. Summary effects are presented with a level of statistical significance and 95% Confidence Intervals.

Results

A total of 28 articles were selected following the literature search. Fourteen studies on patients awaiting listing (n = 1903), nine on patients on the KT waiting list (n = 196), a single study on simultaneous BMS and KT and ten studies on patients undergoing BMS following KT (n = 198). Mean change in BMI for patients awaiting listing was −11.3 kg/m2 (95%CI: −15.3 to −7.3, p < 0.001), mean change in BMI for patients listed for KT was −11.2 kg/m 2(95%CI: −12.9 to −9.5, p 0.001) and mean change for patients with prior KT was −11.0 kg/m2 (95%CI: −7.09 to −14.9, p < 0.001). The combined mortality rate for patients who had undergone both BMS and KT was 4% (n = 15).

Discussion

This review demonstrates BMS is both safe and efficacious in patients with ESRD prior to KT and in those post KT. It would enable difficult-to-list obese recipients the possibility to undergo transplantation and should be considered as part of the work up process.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Transplantation Reviews
Transplantation Reviews IMMUNOLOGY-TRANSPLANTATION
CiteScore
7.50
自引率
2.50%
发文量
40
审稿时长
29 days
期刊介绍: Transplantation Reviews contains state-of-the-art review articles on both clinical and experimental transplantation. The journal features invited articles by authorities in immunology, transplantation medicine and surgery.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信