关节镜检查在外伤性手腕损伤中的作用:一项专家调查。

IF 0.6 Q4 ORTHOPEDICS
Philip N d'Ailly, Marjolein A M Mulders, J Henk Coert, Niels W L Schep
{"title":"关节镜检查在外伤性手腕损伤中的作用:一项专家调查。","authors":"Philip N d'Ailly,&nbsp;Marjolein A M Mulders,&nbsp;J Henk Coert,&nbsp;Niels W L Schep","doi":"10.1055/s-0042-1750875","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p><b>Background</b>  Wrist arthroscopy has become increasingly popular for diagnosing and treating traumatic wrist injuries. How wrist arthroscopy has influenced the daily practice of wrist surgeons remains unclear. The objective of this study was to evaluate the role of wrist arthroscopy for the diagnosis and treatment of traumatic wrist injuries among members of the International Wrist Arthroscopy Society (IWAS). <b>Methods</b>  An online survey was conducted among IWAS members between August and November 2021 with questions regarding the diagnostic and therapeutic importance of wrist arthroscopy. Questions focused on traumatic injuries of the triangular fibrocartilage complex (TFCC) and scapholunate ligament (SLL). Multiple-choice questions were presented in the form of a Likert scale. The primary outcome was respondent agreement, defined as 80% answering similarly. <b>Results</b>  The survey was completed by 211 respondents (39% response rate). The majority (81%) were certified or fellowship-trained wrist surgeons. Most respondents (74%) had performed over 100 wrist arthroscopies. Agreement was reached on 4 of the 22 questions. It was agreed that the outcomes of wrist arthroscopy strongly depend on surgeons' experience, that there is sufficient evidence for the diagnostic purposes of wrist arthroscopy, and that wrist arthroscopy is better than magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) for diagnosing TFCC and SLL injuries. No agreement was reached on the preferred treatment of any type of TFCC or SLL injury. <b>Conclusion</b>  There is agreement that wrist arthroscopy is superior to MRI for diagnosing traumatic TFCC and SLL injuries, yet experts remain divided on the optimal management. Guidelines need to be developed for the standardization of indications and procedures. <b>Level of Evidence</b>  This is a Level III study.</p>","PeriodicalId":46757,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Wrist Surgery","volume":"12 3","pages":"192-198"},"PeriodicalIF":0.6000,"publicationDate":"2023-06-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10202572/pdf/10-1055-s-0042-1750875.pdf","citationCount":"1","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"The Current Role of Arthroscopy in Traumatic Wrist Injuries: An Expert Survey.\",\"authors\":\"Philip N d'Ailly,&nbsp;Marjolein A M Mulders,&nbsp;J Henk Coert,&nbsp;Niels W L Schep\",\"doi\":\"10.1055/s-0042-1750875\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p><b>Background</b>  Wrist arthroscopy has become increasingly popular for diagnosing and treating traumatic wrist injuries. How wrist arthroscopy has influenced the daily practice of wrist surgeons remains unclear. The objective of this study was to evaluate the role of wrist arthroscopy for the diagnosis and treatment of traumatic wrist injuries among members of the International Wrist Arthroscopy Society (IWAS). <b>Methods</b>  An online survey was conducted among IWAS members between August and November 2021 with questions regarding the diagnostic and therapeutic importance of wrist arthroscopy. Questions focused on traumatic injuries of the triangular fibrocartilage complex (TFCC) and scapholunate ligament (SLL). Multiple-choice questions were presented in the form of a Likert scale. The primary outcome was respondent agreement, defined as 80% answering similarly. <b>Results</b>  The survey was completed by 211 respondents (39% response rate). The majority (81%) were certified or fellowship-trained wrist surgeons. Most respondents (74%) had performed over 100 wrist arthroscopies. Agreement was reached on 4 of the 22 questions. It was agreed that the outcomes of wrist arthroscopy strongly depend on surgeons' experience, that there is sufficient evidence for the diagnostic purposes of wrist arthroscopy, and that wrist arthroscopy is better than magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) for diagnosing TFCC and SLL injuries. No agreement was reached on the preferred treatment of any type of TFCC or SLL injury. <b>Conclusion</b>  There is agreement that wrist arthroscopy is superior to MRI for diagnosing traumatic TFCC and SLL injuries, yet experts remain divided on the optimal management. Guidelines need to be developed for the standardization of indications and procedures. <b>Level of Evidence</b>  This is a Level III study.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":46757,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of Wrist Surgery\",\"volume\":\"12 3\",\"pages\":\"192-198\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.6000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-06-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10202572/pdf/10-1055-s-0042-1750875.pdf\",\"citationCount\":\"1\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of Wrist Surgery\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1055/s-0042-1750875\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q4\",\"JCRName\":\"ORTHOPEDICS\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Wrist Surgery","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1055/s-0042-1750875","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"ORTHOPEDICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

摘要

腕部关节镜检查在诊断和治疗外伤性手腕损伤方面越来越受欢迎。腕部关节镜检查如何影响腕部外科医生的日常实践尚不清楚。本研究的目的是在国际腕部关节镜学会(IWAS)成员中评估腕部关节镜在外伤性腕部损伤诊断和治疗中的作用。方法于2021年8月至11月对IWAS成员进行在线调查,询问腕部关节镜检查的诊断和治疗重要性。问题集中在三角纤维软骨复合体(TFCC)和舟月骨韧带(SLL)的外伤性损伤。多项选择题以李克特量表的形式呈现。主要结果是受访者同意,定义为80%的人回答相似。结果共211人完成调查,回复率39%。大多数(81%)是经过认证或培训的腕部外科医生。大多数受访者(74%)进行了100次以上的腕部关节镜检查。22个问题中的4个达成了一致。我们一致认为,腕关节镜检查的结果很大程度上取决于外科医生的经验,有足够的证据证明腕关节镜检查的诊断目的,并且腕关节镜检查比磁共振成像(MRI)诊断TFCC和SLL损伤更好。对于任何类型的TFCC或SLL损伤的首选治疗方法尚未达成一致。结论关节镜对外伤性TFCC和SLL损伤的诊断优于MRI,但专家对最佳治疗方法仍存在分歧。需要为适应证和程序的标准化制定指南。这是一项III级研究。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
The Current Role of Arthroscopy in Traumatic Wrist Injuries: An Expert Survey.

Background  Wrist arthroscopy has become increasingly popular for diagnosing and treating traumatic wrist injuries. How wrist arthroscopy has influenced the daily practice of wrist surgeons remains unclear. The objective of this study was to evaluate the role of wrist arthroscopy for the diagnosis and treatment of traumatic wrist injuries among members of the International Wrist Arthroscopy Society (IWAS). Methods  An online survey was conducted among IWAS members between August and November 2021 with questions regarding the diagnostic and therapeutic importance of wrist arthroscopy. Questions focused on traumatic injuries of the triangular fibrocartilage complex (TFCC) and scapholunate ligament (SLL). Multiple-choice questions were presented in the form of a Likert scale. The primary outcome was respondent agreement, defined as 80% answering similarly. Results  The survey was completed by 211 respondents (39% response rate). The majority (81%) were certified or fellowship-trained wrist surgeons. Most respondents (74%) had performed over 100 wrist arthroscopies. Agreement was reached on 4 of the 22 questions. It was agreed that the outcomes of wrist arthroscopy strongly depend on surgeons' experience, that there is sufficient evidence for the diagnostic purposes of wrist arthroscopy, and that wrist arthroscopy is better than magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) for diagnosing TFCC and SLL injuries. No agreement was reached on the preferred treatment of any type of TFCC or SLL injury. Conclusion  There is agreement that wrist arthroscopy is superior to MRI for diagnosing traumatic TFCC and SLL injuries, yet experts remain divided on the optimal management. Guidelines need to be developed for the standardization of indications and procedures. Level of Evidence  This is a Level III study.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
28.60%
发文量
78
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信