Is the transradial approach associated with decreased acute kidney injury following percutaneous coronary intervention in patients not complicated by major bleeding and haemodynamic disturbance?

Background: The impact of the transradial approach (TRA) on the development of acute kidney injury (AKI) after percutaneous coronary interventions (PCI) has been controversial.

Methods: We retrospectively analysed 463 patients undergoing PCI for either acute or chronic coronary syndrome. Excluded patients were those with missing laboratory or procedural data, acute/decompensated heart failure, major bleeding, haemodynamic instability, long-term dialysis and mortality. The primary endpoint of the study was the incidence of AKI after PCI, which was defined as an increase in serum creatinine (SCr) level of 0.5 mg/dl or 25% from the baseline. Secondary endpoints were change in SCr level, increase in SCr of ≥ 0.3 and ≥ 0.5 mg/dl, and increase in SCr of ≥ 25 and ≥ 50%. We compared the incidence of AKI between the TRA and the transfemoral approach (TFA) in the overall and a propensity score (PS)-matched study population.

Results: The study population included 339 patients. After PS matching, we obtained a well-balanced population of 182 patients. The differences between the incidence of AKI in the TRA and TFA were not significant in both the overall (9.0 vs 11.2%, p = 0.503) and PS-matched (9.9 vs 7.7%, p = 0.601) study population. TRA resulted in a significantly lower incidence of SCr increase of ≥ 50% in unmatched patients. However, after PS matching, there was no difference between the TRA and TFA in any variable of secondary post-PCI renal outcomes. Age, female gender, baseline SCr level, baseline estimated glomerular filtration rate and contrast volume were independent predictors of AKI.

Conclusion: Compared to the conventional TFA, TRA was not associated with a reduced incidence of AKI after PCI in patients not complicated by major bleeding, acute heart failure and haemodynamic disturbances.