尿酸结石溶出治疗的选择和结果:文献系统综述。

IF 2.5 2区 医学 Q2 UROLOGY & NEPHROLOGY
Andrea Ong, George Brown, Theodoros Tokas, B M Zeeshan Hameed, Joe Philip, Bhaskar K Somani
{"title":"尿酸结石溶出治疗的选择和结果:文献系统综述。","authors":"Andrea Ong,&nbsp;George Brown,&nbsp;Theodoros Tokas,&nbsp;B M Zeeshan Hameed,&nbsp;Joe Philip,&nbsp;Bhaskar K Somani","doi":"10.1007/s11934-023-01164-7","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Purpose of review: </strong>The prevalence of uric acid (UA) urolithiasis contributes significantly to global disease burden, due to high rates of recurrence and diagnostic challenges. Dissolution therapy plays a valuable role in the conservative management of UA calculi, reducing the requirement for surgical intervention. This review summarises the existing evidence for the efficacy of medical dissolution of uric acid urolithiasis.</p><p><strong>Recent findings: </strong>A systematic search was conducted of worldwide literature according to PRISMA methodology and Cochrane standards for systematic review. Studies were included if they reported outcome data for the administration of medical therapy for the dissolution of UA calculi. A total of 1075 patients were included in the systematic review. Complete or partial dissolution of UA calculi was observed in 80.5% of patients (865/1075 patients), with 61.7% (647/1048 patients) achieving complete dissolution and 19.8% (207/1048 patients) achieving partial dissolution. A discontinuation rate of 10.2% (110/1075 patients) was noted, and 15.7% (169/1075 patients) required surgical intervention. Dissolution therapy is a safe and effective method of conservatively managing uric acid stones in the short term. Despite the significant disease burden of UA calculi, current guidelines are limited by deficiencies in the existing body of research. Further research should be undertaken to develop evidence-based clinical guidelines for diagnosis, treatment, and prevention of UA urolithiasis.</p>","PeriodicalId":11112,"journal":{"name":"Current Urology Reports","volume":"24 8","pages":"355-363"},"PeriodicalIF":2.5000,"publicationDate":"2023-08-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Selection and Outcomes for Dissolution Therapy in Uric Acid Stones: A Systematic Review of Literature.\",\"authors\":\"Andrea Ong,&nbsp;George Brown,&nbsp;Theodoros Tokas,&nbsp;B M Zeeshan Hameed,&nbsp;Joe Philip,&nbsp;Bhaskar K Somani\",\"doi\":\"10.1007/s11934-023-01164-7\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Purpose of review: </strong>The prevalence of uric acid (UA) urolithiasis contributes significantly to global disease burden, due to high rates of recurrence and diagnostic challenges. Dissolution therapy plays a valuable role in the conservative management of UA calculi, reducing the requirement for surgical intervention. This review summarises the existing evidence for the efficacy of medical dissolution of uric acid urolithiasis.</p><p><strong>Recent findings: </strong>A systematic search was conducted of worldwide literature according to PRISMA methodology and Cochrane standards for systematic review. Studies were included if they reported outcome data for the administration of medical therapy for the dissolution of UA calculi. A total of 1075 patients were included in the systematic review. Complete or partial dissolution of UA calculi was observed in 80.5% of patients (865/1075 patients), with 61.7% (647/1048 patients) achieving complete dissolution and 19.8% (207/1048 patients) achieving partial dissolution. A discontinuation rate of 10.2% (110/1075 patients) was noted, and 15.7% (169/1075 patients) required surgical intervention. Dissolution therapy is a safe and effective method of conservatively managing uric acid stones in the short term. Despite the significant disease burden of UA calculi, current guidelines are limited by deficiencies in the existing body of research. Further research should be undertaken to develop evidence-based clinical guidelines for diagnosis, treatment, and prevention of UA urolithiasis.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":11112,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Current Urology Reports\",\"volume\":\"24 8\",\"pages\":\"355-363\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.5000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-08-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Current Urology Reports\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1007/s11934-023-01164-7\",\"RegionNum\":2,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"UROLOGY & NEPHROLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Current Urology Reports","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s11934-023-01164-7","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"UROLOGY & NEPHROLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

综述目的:尿酸(UA)尿石症的患病率显著增加了全球疾病负担,因为其复发率高且诊断困难。溶出治疗在UA结石的保守治疗中发挥了重要作用,减少了手术干预的需要。本文综述了药物溶尿酸尿石症疗效的现有证据。最近发现:根据PRISMA方法和Cochrane系统评价标准,对全球文献进行了系统检索。如果研究报告了UA结石溶解药物治疗的结果数据,则纳入研究。系统评价共纳入1075例患者。80.5%的患者(865/1075例)发现UA结石完全或部分溶解,61.7%(647/1048例)达到完全溶解,19.8%(207/1048例)达到部分溶解。停药率为10.2%(110/1075例),15.7%(169/1075例)需要手术干预。溶栓治疗是一种安全有效的短期保守治疗尿酸结石的方法。尽管UA结石的疾病负担很大,但目前的指南受到现有研究机构缺陷的限制。应开展进一步的研究,以制定诊断、治疗和预防UA尿石症的循证临床指南。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。

Selection and Outcomes for Dissolution Therapy in Uric Acid Stones: A Systematic Review of Literature.

Selection and Outcomes for Dissolution Therapy in Uric Acid Stones: A Systematic Review of Literature.

Purpose of review: The prevalence of uric acid (UA) urolithiasis contributes significantly to global disease burden, due to high rates of recurrence and diagnostic challenges. Dissolution therapy plays a valuable role in the conservative management of UA calculi, reducing the requirement for surgical intervention. This review summarises the existing evidence for the efficacy of medical dissolution of uric acid urolithiasis.

Recent findings: A systematic search was conducted of worldwide literature according to PRISMA methodology and Cochrane standards for systematic review. Studies were included if they reported outcome data for the administration of medical therapy for the dissolution of UA calculi. A total of 1075 patients were included in the systematic review. Complete or partial dissolution of UA calculi was observed in 80.5% of patients (865/1075 patients), with 61.7% (647/1048 patients) achieving complete dissolution and 19.8% (207/1048 patients) achieving partial dissolution. A discontinuation rate of 10.2% (110/1075 patients) was noted, and 15.7% (169/1075 patients) required surgical intervention. Dissolution therapy is a safe and effective method of conservatively managing uric acid stones in the short term. Despite the significant disease burden of UA calculi, current guidelines are limited by deficiencies in the existing body of research. Further research should be undertaken to develop evidence-based clinical guidelines for diagnosis, treatment, and prevention of UA urolithiasis.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Current Urology Reports
Current Urology Reports UROLOGY & NEPHROLOGY-
CiteScore
4.60
自引率
3.80%
发文量
39
期刊介绍: This journal intends to review the most important, recently published findings in the field of urology. By providing clear, insightful, balanced contributions by international experts, the journal elucidates current and emerging approaches to the care and prevention of urologic diseases and conditions. We accomplish this aim by appointing international authorities to serve as Section Editors in key subject areas, such as benign prostatic hyperplasia, erectile dysfunction, female urology, and kidney disease. Section Editors, in turn, select topics for which leading experts contribute comprehensive review articles that emphasize new developments and recently published papers of major importance, highlighted by annotated reference lists. An international Editorial Board reviews the annual table of contents, suggests articles of special interest to their country/region, and ensures that topics are current and include emerging research. Commentaries from well-known figures in the field are also provided.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信