基础认知纠缠语言相对性：对评论者的回应。

IF 2.9 2区心理学 Q1 PSYCHOLOGY, EXPERIMENTAL

Topics in Cognitive Science Pub Date : 2023-10-01 Epub Date: 2023-08-03 DOI:10.1111/tops.12687

David Kemmerer

{"title":"基础认知纠缠语言相对性：对评论者的回应。","authors":"David Kemmerer","doi":"10.1111/tops.12687","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"In this paper, I respond to eight commentaries on my target article called \"Grounded cognition entails linguistic relativity: A neglected implication of a major semantic theory.\" The commentaries span a broad range of disciplines and perspectives. I have organized my response around the following topics: (1) an introductory synopsis of my main argument; (2) grounded versus amodal theories of concepts; (3) language-specific versus language-independent concepts; (4) language, culture, and cognition; (5) language itself as a source of conceptual grounding; (6) abstract concepts, linguistic relativity, and contextual and individual variability; (7) word meanings as language-specific predictions; and (8) some final remarks about the importance of cross-linguistic diversity.","PeriodicalId":47822,"journal":{"name":"Topics in Cognitive Science","volume":" ","pages":"698-708"},"PeriodicalIF":2.9000,"publicationDate":"2023-10-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Grounded Cognition Entails Linguistic Relativity: Response to Commentators.\",\"authors\":\"David Kemmerer\",\"doi\":\"10.1111/tops.12687\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"In this paper, I respond to eight commentaries on my target article called \\\"Grounded cognition entails linguistic relativity: A neglected implication of a major semantic theory.\\\" The commentaries span a broad range of disciplines and perspectives. I have organized my response around the following topics: (1) an introductory synopsis of my main argument; (2) grounded versus amodal theories of concepts; (3) language-specific versus language-independent concepts; (4) language, culture, and cognition; (5) language itself as a source of conceptual grounding; (6) abstract concepts, linguistic relativity, and contextual and individual variability; (7) word meanings as language-specific predictions; and (8) some final remarks about the importance of cross-linguistic diversity.\",\"PeriodicalId\":47822,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Topics in Cognitive Science\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"698-708\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.9000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-10-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Topics in Cognitive Science\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"102\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1111/tops.12687\",\"RegionNum\":2,\"RegionCategory\":\"心理学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2023/8/3 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"Epub\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"PSYCHOLOGY, EXPERIMENTAL\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Topics in Cognitive Science","FirstCategoryId":"102","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1111/tops.12687","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"心理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2023/8/3 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"PSYCHOLOGY, EXPERIMENTAL","Score":null,"Total":0}

引用次数: 0

摘要

在这篇论文中，我回应了我的目标文章《基础认知包含语言相对性：一个主要语义理论的被忽视的含义》的八篇评论。这些评论涵盖了广泛的学科和视角。我围绕以下主题组织了我的回应：（1）我的主要论点的简介；（2）扎根与畸形的概念理论；（3）语言特定概念与语言无关概念；（4）语言、文化和认知；（5）语言本身是概念基础的来源；（6）抽象概念、语言相关性、语境和个体可变性；（7）作为语言特定预测的词义；以及（8）关于跨语言多样性的重要性的一些最后评论。

本文章由计算机程序翻译，如有差异，请以英文原文为准。

查看原文本刊更多论文

Grounded Cognition Entails Linguistic Relativity: Response to Commentators.

In this paper, I respond to eight commentaries on my target article called "Grounded cognition entails linguistic relativity: A neglected implication of a major semantic theory." The commentaries span a broad range of disciplines and perspectives. I have organized my response around the following topics: (1) an introductory synopsis of my main argument; (2) grounded versus amodal theories of concepts; (3) language-specific versus language-independent concepts; (4) language, culture, and cognition; (5) language itself as a source of conceptual grounding; (6) abstract concepts, linguistic relativity, and contextual and individual variability; (7) word meanings as language-specific predictions; and (8) some final remarks about the importance of cross-linguistic diversity.

求助全文

通过发布文献求助，成功后即可免费获取论文全文。去求助

来源期刊

Topics in Cognitive Science PSYCHOLOGY, EXPERIMENTAL-

CiteScore

8.50

自引率

10.00%

发文量

期刊介绍： Topics in Cognitive Science (topiCS) is an innovative new journal that covers all areas of cognitive science including cognitive modeling, cognitive neuroscience, cognitive anthropology, and cognitive science and philosophy. topiCS aims to provide a forum for: -New communities of researchers- New controversies in established areas- Debates and commentaries- Reflections and integration The publication features multiple scholarly papers dedicated to a single topic. Some of these topics will appear together in one issue, but others may appear across several issues or develop into a regular feature. Controversies or debates started in one issue may be followed up by commentaries in a later issue, etc. However, the format and origin of the topics will vary greatly.