作为领导者的医生:通过专家领导视角的系统回顾。

IF 1.7 Q3 HEALTH POLICY & SERVICES
Gina Phelps Thoebes, Tracy H Porter, Jessica A Peck
{"title":"作为领导者的医生:通过专家领导视角的系统回顾。","authors":"Gina Phelps Thoebes,&nbsp;Tracy H Porter,&nbsp;Jessica A Peck","doi":"10.1108/LHS-02-2023-0008","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Purpose: </strong>The purpose of this paper is to provide a systematic review of the current state of physician leadership. Theory of expert leadership (TEL) was applied to explore the effects of physician inherent knowledge, industry experience and leadership capabilities on leader behaviors and outcomes.</p><p><strong>Design/methodology/approach: </strong>This review (August 2011-February 2022) applied the preferred reporting items for systematic review and meta-analysis strategy. Our search began with 3,537 studies and a final sample of 12 articles.</p><p><strong>Findings: </strong>The findings offer a number of studies that note the relationship between physician leadership and the three dimensions of TEL. How influential these are on leadership behaviors and health-related outcomes varies. We also found a number of studies that described general physician leadership behaviors that were not directly linked to factors of TEL, as well as two additional themes: leader identity and trust.</p><p><strong>Originality/value: </strong>To the best of the authors' knowledge, this is the first systematic review that has applied a highly cited theory (i.e. TEL) to the data and the first that has focused solely on a U.S. population. These findings offer healthcare organizations insight into the potential strengths and challenges of physician leadership.</p>","PeriodicalId":46165,"journal":{"name":"Leadership in Health Services","volume":"ahead-of-print ahead-of-print","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":1.7000,"publicationDate":"2023-07-21","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Physicians as leaders: a systematic review through the lens of expert leadership.\",\"authors\":\"Gina Phelps Thoebes,&nbsp;Tracy H Porter,&nbsp;Jessica A Peck\",\"doi\":\"10.1108/LHS-02-2023-0008\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Purpose: </strong>The purpose of this paper is to provide a systematic review of the current state of physician leadership. Theory of expert leadership (TEL) was applied to explore the effects of physician inherent knowledge, industry experience and leadership capabilities on leader behaviors and outcomes.</p><p><strong>Design/methodology/approach: </strong>This review (August 2011-February 2022) applied the preferred reporting items for systematic review and meta-analysis strategy. Our search began with 3,537 studies and a final sample of 12 articles.</p><p><strong>Findings: </strong>The findings offer a number of studies that note the relationship between physician leadership and the three dimensions of TEL. How influential these are on leadership behaviors and health-related outcomes varies. We also found a number of studies that described general physician leadership behaviors that were not directly linked to factors of TEL, as well as two additional themes: leader identity and trust.</p><p><strong>Originality/value: </strong>To the best of the authors' knowledge, this is the first systematic review that has applied a highly cited theory (i.e. TEL) to the data and the first that has focused solely on a U.S. population. These findings offer healthcare organizations insight into the potential strengths and challenges of physician leadership.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":46165,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Leadership in Health Services\",\"volume\":\"ahead-of-print ahead-of-print\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.7000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-07-21\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Leadership in Health Services\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1108/LHS-02-2023-0008\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"HEALTH POLICY & SERVICES\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Leadership in Health Services","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1108/LHS-02-2023-0008","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"HEALTH POLICY & SERVICES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

目的:本文的目的是提供一个系统的审查,目前状态的医生领导。运用专家领导理论探讨医师固有知识、行业经验和领导能力对领导行为和结果的影响。设计/方法/方法:本综述(2011年8月- 2022年2月)采用首选报告项目进行系统评价和荟萃分析策略。我们的搜索从3537项研究和12篇文章的最终样本开始。研究结果:这些发现提供了许多研究,这些研究注意到医生领导与TEL三个维度之间的关系。这些研究对领导行为和健康相关结果的影响程度各不相同。我们还发现了一些研究,这些研究描述了普通医生的领导行为,这些行为与TEL因素没有直接联系,以及两个额外的主题:领导者身份和信任。原创性/价值:据作者所知,这是第一个将高引用理论(即TEL)应用于数据的系统综述,也是第一个只关注美国人口的综述。这些发现为医疗保健组织提供了对医生领导的潜在优势和挑战的见解。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Physicians as leaders: a systematic review through the lens of expert leadership.

Purpose: The purpose of this paper is to provide a systematic review of the current state of physician leadership. Theory of expert leadership (TEL) was applied to explore the effects of physician inherent knowledge, industry experience and leadership capabilities on leader behaviors and outcomes.

Design/methodology/approach: This review (August 2011-February 2022) applied the preferred reporting items for systematic review and meta-analysis strategy. Our search began with 3,537 studies and a final sample of 12 articles.

Findings: The findings offer a number of studies that note the relationship between physician leadership and the three dimensions of TEL. How influential these are on leadership behaviors and health-related outcomes varies. We also found a number of studies that described general physician leadership behaviors that were not directly linked to factors of TEL, as well as two additional themes: leader identity and trust.

Originality/value: To the best of the authors' knowledge, this is the first systematic review that has applied a highly cited theory (i.e. TEL) to the data and the first that has focused solely on a U.S. population. These findings offer healthcare organizations insight into the potential strengths and challenges of physician leadership.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Leadership in Health Services
Leadership in Health Services HEALTH POLICY & SERVICES-
CiteScore
2.90
自引率
17.60%
发文量
51
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信