Keloids, hypertrophic scars, and uterine fibroid development: a prospective ultrasound study of Black and African American women

Objective

To examine the association between keloids, hypertrophic scars, and uterine fibroid incidence as well as growth. Both keloids and fibroids are fibroproliferative conditions that have been reported to be more prevalent among Blacks than Whites, and they share similar fibrotic tissue structures, including extracellular matrix composition, gene expression, and protein profiles. We hypothesized that women with a history of keloids would have greater uterine fibroid development.

Design

A prospective community cohort study (enrollment 2010–2012) with 4 study visits over 5 years to conduct standardized ultrasounds to detect and measure fibroids ≥0.5 cm in diameter, assess the history of keloid and hypertrophic scars, and update covariates.

Setting

Detroit, Michigan area.

Patients

A total of 1,610 self-identified Black and/or African American women aged 23–35 years at enrollment without a previous clinical diagnosis of fibroids.

Exposure(s)

Keloids (raised scars that grow beyond the margins of the original injury) and hypertrophic scars (raised scars that stay within the bounds of the original injury). Because of the difficulties in distinguishing keloids and hypertrophic scars, we separately examined the history of keloids and the history of either keloids or hypertrophic scars (any abnormal scarring) and their associations with fibroid incidence and growth.

Main Outcome Measure(s)

Fibroid incidence (new fibroid after a fibroid-free ultrasound at enrollment) was assessed using Cox proportional-hazards regression. Fibroid growth was assessed using linear mixed models. The estimates for the change in log volume per 18 months were converted to the estimated percentage difference in volume for scarring vs. no-scarring. Both incidence and growth models were adjusted for time-varying demographic, reproductive, and anthropometric factors.

Result(s)

Of the 1,230 fibroid-free participants, 199 (16%) reported ever having keloids, 578 (47%) reported keloids or hypertrophic scars, and 293 (24%) developed incident fibroids. Neither keloids (adjusted hazard ratio = 1.04; 95% confidence interval: 0.77, 1.40) nor any abnormal scarring (adjusted hazard ratio = 1.10; 95% confidence interval: 0.88, 1.38) were associated with fibroid incidence. Fibroid growth differed little by scarring status.

Conclusion(s)

Despite molecular similarities, self-reported keloid and hypertrophic scars did not show an association with fibroid development. Future research may benefit from the examination of dermatologist-confirmed keloids or hypertrophic scars; however, our data suggest little shared susceptibility for these 2 types of fibrotic conditions.