在农村社区使用COVID虚拟医院进行COVID-19主动疾病管理。

IF 1.6 Q3 HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES
Gandhari Loomis, Regina Rhodes, Ed Bujold, Golnosh Sharafsaleh, Ellen Collett, Mark Irwin, Elizabeth W Staton, John M Westfall
{"title":"在农村社区使用COVID虚拟医院进行COVID-19主动疾病管理。","authors":"Gandhari Loomis,&nbsp;Regina Rhodes,&nbsp;Ed Bujold,&nbsp;Golnosh Sharafsaleh,&nbsp;Ellen Collett,&nbsp;Mark Irwin,&nbsp;Elizabeth W Staton,&nbsp;John M Westfall","doi":"10.17294/2330-0698.1998","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Purpose: </strong>A community teaching hospital serving a rural population established an intensive \"hospital at home\" program for patients with COVID-19 utilizing disease risk stratification and pulse oximeter readings to dictate nurse and clinician contact. Herein, we report patient outcomes and provider experiences resulting from this \"virtual\" approach to triaging pandemic care.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>COVID-19-positive patients appropriate for outpatient management were enrolled in our COVID Virtual Hospital (CVH). Patients received pulse oximeters and instructions for home monitoring of vital signs. CVH nurses contacted the patient within 12-48 hours. The primary care provider was alerted of the patient's diagnosis and held a virtual visit with patient within 2-3 days. Nurses completed a triage form during each patient call; the resulting risk score determined timing of subsequent calls. CVH-relevant patient outcomes included emergency department (ED) visits, mortality, and disease-related hospitalization. Additionally, a survey of providers was conducted to assess CVH experience.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>From April 22, 2020, to December 21, 2020, 1916 patients were enrolled in the CVH, of which 195 (10.2%) had subsequent visits to the ED. Among those 195 ED visits, 102 (52.3%) were nurse-directed while 93 (47.7%) were patient self-directed; 88 (86.3%) nurse-directed ED visits were subsequently admitted to inpatient care and 14 were discharged home. Of the 93 self-directed ED visits, 3 (3.2%) were admitted. A total of 91 CVH patients (4.7%) were ultimately admitted to inpatient care. Seven deaths occurred among CVH patients, 5 of whom had been admitted for inpatient care. Among 71 providers (23%) who responded to the survey, 94% and 93% agreed that the CVH was beneficial to providers and patients, respectively.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Proactive in-home triage of patients with COVID-19 utilizing a virtual hospital model minimized unnecessary presentations to ED and likely prevented our rural hospital from becoming overwhelmed during year one of the pandemic.</p>","PeriodicalId":16724,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Patient-Centered Research and Reviews","volume":"10 3","pages":"104-110"},"PeriodicalIF":1.6000,"publicationDate":"2023-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10358976/pdf/jpcrr-10.3.104.pdf","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"COVID-19 Proactive Disease Management Using COVID Virtual Hospital in a Rural Community.\",\"authors\":\"Gandhari Loomis,&nbsp;Regina Rhodes,&nbsp;Ed Bujold,&nbsp;Golnosh Sharafsaleh,&nbsp;Ellen Collett,&nbsp;Mark Irwin,&nbsp;Elizabeth W Staton,&nbsp;John M Westfall\",\"doi\":\"10.17294/2330-0698.1998\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Purpose: </strong>A community teaching hospital serving a rural population established an intensive \\\"hospital at home\\\" program for patients with COVID-19 utilizing disease risk stratification and pulse oximeter readings to dictate nurse and clinician contact. Herein, we report patient outcomes and provider experiences resulting from this \\\"virtual\\\" approach to triaging pandemic care.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>COVID-19-positive patients appropriate for outpatient management were enrolled in our COVID Virtual Hospital (CVH). Patients received pulse oximeters and instructions for home monitoring of vital signs. CVH nurses contacted the patient within 12-48 hours. The primary care provider was alerted of the patient's diagnosis and held a virtual visit with patient within 2-3 days. Nurses completed a triage form during each patient call; the resulting risk score determined timing of subsequent calls. CVH-relevant patient outcomes included emergency department (ED) visits, mortality, and disease-related hospitalization. Additionally, a survey of providers was conducted to assess CVH experience.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>From April 22, 2020, to December 21, 2020, 1916 patients were enrolled in the CVH, of which 195 (10.2%) had subsequent visits to the ED. Among those 195 ED visits, 102 (52.3%) were nurse-directed while 93 (47.7%) were patient self-directed; 88 (86.3%) nurse-directed ED visits were subsequently admitted to inpatient care and 14 were discharged home. Of the 93 self-directed ED visits, 3 (3.2%) were admitted. A total of 91 CVH patients (4.7%) were ultimately admitted to inpatient care. Seven deaths occurred among CVH patients, 5 of whom had been admitted for inpatient care. Among 71 providers (23%) who responded to the survey, 94% and 93% agreed that the CVH was beneficial to providers and patients, respectively.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Proactive in-home triage of patients with COVID-19 utilizing a virtual hospital model minimized unnecessary presentations to ED and likely prevented our rural hospital from becoming overwhelmed during year one of the pandemic.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":16724,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of Patient-Centered Research and Reviews\",\"volume\":\"10 3\",\"pages\":\"104-110\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.6000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-01-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10358976/pdf/jpcrr-10.3.104.pdf\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of Patient-Centered Research and Reviews\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.17294/2330-0698.1998\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Patient-Centered Research and Reviews","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.17294/2330-0698.1998","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

目的:一家为农村人口服务的社区教学医院为COVID-19患者建立了一个强化的“家庭医院”项目,利用疾病风险分层和脉搏血氧仪读数来指示护士和临床医生的联系方式。在此,我们报告了这种“虚拟”方法对流行病护理进行分诊的患者结果和提供者经验。方法:将适合门诊管理的COVID-19阳性患者纳入我们的COVID虚拟医院(CVH)。患者接受脉搏血氧仪和家庭生命体征监测指导。CVH护士在12-48小时内联系了患者。初级保健提供者被告知患者的诊断,并在2-3天内与患者进行了虚拟访问。护士在每个病人就诊时填写一份分诊表;由此产生的风险评分决定了后续调用的时间。cvh相关的患者结果包括急诊就诊、死亡率和疾病相关住院。此外,对供应商进行了一项调查,以评估CVH的经验。结果:2020年4月22日至2020年12月21日,共有1916例患者入组CVH,其中195例(10.2%)患者随访急诊科,其中102例(52.3%)患者在护士指导下就诊,93例(47.7%)患者自行就诊;88例(86.3%)在护士指导下急诊科就诊,随后住院治疗,14例出院回家。在93例自行诊症中,3例(3.2%)获接纳。共有91例CVH患者(4.7%)最终住院治疗。CVH患者中有7例死亡,其中5例入院接受住院治疗。在接受调查的71名提供者(23%)中,分别有94%和93%的人同意CVH对提供者和患者有益。结论:利用虚拟医院模型对COVID-19患者进行主动在家分诊,最大限度地减少了不必要的急诊科就诊,并有可能防止我们的农村医院在大流行的第一年不堪重负。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
COVID-19 Proactive Disease Management Using COVID Virtual Hospital in a Rural Community.

Purpose: A community teaching hospital serving a rural population established an intensive "hospital at home" program for patients with COVID-19 utilizing disease risk stratification and pulse oximeter readings to dictate nurse and clinician contact. Herein, we report patient outcomes and provider experiences resulting from this "virtual" approach to triaging pandemic care.

Methods: COVID-19-positive patients appropriate for outpatient management were enrolled in our COVID Virtual Hospital (CVH). Patients received pulse oximeters and instructions for home monitoring of vital signs. CVH nurses contacted the patient within 12-48 hours. The primary care provider was alerted of the patient's diagnosis and held a virtual visit with patient within 2-3 days. Nurses completed a triage form during each patient call; the resulting risk score determined timing of subsequent calls. CVH-relevant patient outcomes included emergency department (ED) visits, mortality, and disease-related hospitalization. Additionally, a survey of providers was conducted to assess CVH experience.

Results: From April 22, 2020, to December 21, 2020, 1916 patients were enrolled in the CVH, of which 195 (10.2%) had subsequent visits to the ED. Among those 195 ED visits, 102 (52.3%) were nurse-directed while 93 (47.7%) were patient self-directed; 88 (86.3%) nurse-directed ED visits were subsequently admitted to inpatient care and 14 were discharged home. Of the 93 self-directed ED visits, 3 (3.2%) were admitted. A total of 91 CVH patients (4.7%) were ultimately admitted to inpatient care. Seven deaths occurred among CVH patients, 5 of whom had been admitted for inpatient care. Among 71 providers (23%) who responded to the survey, 94% and 93% agreed that the CVH was beneficial to providers and patients, respectively.

Conclusions: Proactive in-home triage of patients with COVID-19 utilizing a virtual hospital model minimized unnecessary presentations to ED and likely prevented our rural hospital from becoming overwhelmed during year one of the pandemic.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Journal of Patient-Centered Research and Reviews
Journal of Patient-Centered Research and Reviews HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES-
自引率
5.90%
发文量
35
审稿时长
20 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信