多布斯的决定会如何影响美国的国家安全。

Rand health quarterly Pub Date : 2023-05-15 eCollection Date: 2023-05-01
Kyleanne M Hunter, Sarah O Meadows, Rebecca L Collins, Isabelle González
{"title":"多布斯的决定会如何影响美国的国家安全。","authors":"Kyleanne M Hunter, Sarah O Meadows, Rebecca L Collins, Isabelle González","doi":"","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Women are an integral part of the military, comprising 17.2 percent of the active-duty force. They are the fastest-growing subpopulation in the military. In recent years, the Department of Defense (DoD) and military services have been deliberately recruiting women because they represent a higher percentage of the recruitable population than their male counterparts. Service women and their civilian counterparts have been and are serving in roles that are essential to military readiness. The Dobbs v. Jackson Supreme Court ruling will limit service women's and DoD civilian women's access to reproductive health care and affect the health of these critical populations. In this article, the authors use publicly available data to provide an estimate of the scope of the effects of the decision on the health and readiness of the U.S. armed forces. They estimate how many military-employed women's reproductive health options have been or might soon be limited and identify force readiness-related concerns, such as effects on the military health care, education, and child care systems, as well as on military recruiting and retention.</p>","PeriodicalId":74637,"journal":{"name":"Rand health quarterly","volume":"10 2","pages":"9"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-05-15","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10187552/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"How the Dobbs Decision Could Affect U.S. National Security.\",\"authors\":\"Kyleanne M Hunter, Sarah O Meadows, Rebecca L Collins, Isabelle González\",\"doi\":\"\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p>Women are an integral part of the military, comprising 17.2 percent of the active-duty force. They are the fastest-growing subpopulation in the military. In recent years, the Department of Defense (DoD) and military services have been deliberately recruiting women because they represent a higher percentage of the recruitable population than their male counterparts. Service women and their civilian counterparts have been and are serving in roles that are essential to military readiness. The Dobbs v. Jackson Supreme Court ruling will limit service women's and DoD civilian women's access to reproductive health care and affect the health of these critical populations. In this article, the authors use publicly available data to provide an estimate of the scope of the effects of the decision on the health and readiness of the U.S. armed forces. They estimate how many military-employed women's reproductive health options have been or might soon be limited and identify force readiness-related concerns, such as effects on the military health care, education, and child care systems, as well as on military recruiting and retention.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":74637,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Rand health quarterly\",\"volume\":\"10 2\",\"pages\":\"9\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-05-15\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10187552/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Rand health quarterly\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2023/5/1 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"eCollection\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Rand health quarterly","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2023/5/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

妇女是军队不可或缺的一部分,占现役军人的 17.2%。她们是军队中增长最快的亚群。近年来,美国国防部(DoD)和各军种一直在有意招募女性,因为她们在可招募人口中所占的比例高于男性。女军人及其文职对应人员过去和现在都担任着对军事战备至关重要的角色。最高法院对多布斯诉杰克逊案的裁决将限制服役妇女和国防部文职妇女获得生殖保健服务,并影响这些关键人群的健康。在这篇文章中,作者利用公开数据估算了该判决对美国军队健康和战备状态的影响范围。他们估算了有多少从军妇女的生殖健康选择已经或可能很快受到限制,并确定了与部队战备有关的问题,如对军队医疗保健、教育和儿童保育系统的影响,以及对军队招募和留用的影响。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
How the Dobbs Decision Could Affect U.S. National Security.

Women are an integral part of the military, comprising 17.2 percent of the active-duty force. They are the fastest-growing subpopulation in the military. In recent years, the Department of Defense (DoD) and military services have been deliberately recruiting women because they represent a higher percentage of the recruitable population than their male counterparts. Service women and their civilian counterparts have been and are serving in roles that are essential to military readiness. The Dobbs v. Jackson Supreme Court ruling will limit service women's and DoD civilian women's access to reproductive health care and affect the health of these critical populations. In this article, the authors use publicly available data to provide an estimate of the scope of the effects of the decision on the health and readiness of the U.S. armed forces. They estimate how many military-employed women's reproductive health options have been or might soon be limited and identify force readiness-related concerns, such as effects on the military health care, education, and child care systems, as well as on military recruiting and retention.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信