2019 年大麻销售合法化的美国各州通过网络服务和政府维护的州登记册确定的大麻零售商信息的准确性差异。

Cannabis (Albuquerque, N.M.) Pub Date : 2023-07-05 eCollection Date: 2023-01-01 DOI:10.26828/cannabis/2023/000148
Michael Williams, Matt Mahlan, Connor Holmes, Magdalena Pankowska, Manjot Kaur, Aderonke Ilegbusi, Danielle F Haley
{"title":"2019 年大麻销售合法化的美国各州通过网络服务和政府维护的州登记册确定的大麻零售商信息的准确性差异。","authors":"Michael Williams, Matt Mahlan, Connor Holmes, Magdalena Pankowska, Manjot Kaur, Aderonke Ilegbusi, Danielle F Haley","doi":"10.26828/cannabis/2023/000148","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Cannabis retailer locations used to investigate geographic cannabis access are frequently ascertained from two sources: 1) webservices which provide locations of cannabis retailers (e.g., Yelp) or 2) government-maintained registries. Characterizing the operating status and location information accuracy of cannabis retailer data sources on a state-by-state level can inform research examining the health implications of cannabis legalization policies. This study ascertained cannabis retailer name and location from webservices and government-maintained registries for 26 states and the District of Columbia legalizing cannabis sales in 2019. Validation subsamples were created using state-level sequential sampling. Phone surveys were conducted by trained researchers for webservice samples (n=790, November 2019 - May 2020) and government-maintained registry (n=859, February - June 2020) to ascertain information about operating status and location. Accuracy was calculated as the percent agreement among subsample and phone survey data. For operating status and location, webservice derived data was 78% (614/790) and 79% (484/611) accurate, whereas government-maintained registry derived data was 76% (657/859) and 95% (622/655) accurate, respectively. Fifty-nine percent (15/27) of states and the District of Columbia had over 80% accuracy for operating status and 48% (13/27) states had over 80% accuracy for location information with both data sources. However, government-maintained registry derived information was more accurate in 33% (9/27) states for operating status and 41% (11/27) states for location information. Both data sources had similar operating status accuracy. Research using spatial analysis may prefer government-maintained registry derived data due to high location information accuracy, whereas studies looking at broad trends across states may prefer webservice derived. State level COVID-19 restrictions had minimal impact on ascertainment of cannabis retailer operating status and location information via phone survey derived from webservices and government-maintained registries.</p>","PeriodicalId":72520,"journal":{"name":"Cannabis (Albuquerque, N.M.)","volume":"6 2","pages":"133-148"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-07-05","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://ftp.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pub/pmc/oa_pdf/8e/55/rsmj.6.2.133.PMC10361797.pdf","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Accuracy Differences in Cannabis Retailer Information Ascertained from Webservices and Government-Maintained State Registries Across US States Legalizing the Sale of Cannabis in 2019.\",\"authors\":\"Michael Williams, Matt Mahlan, Connor Holmes, Magdalena Pankowska, Manjot Kaur, Aderonke Ilegbusi, Danielle F Haley\",\"doi\":\"10.26828/cannabis/2023/000148\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p>Cannabis retailer locations used to investigate geographic cannabis access are frequently ascertained from two sources: 1) webservices which provide locations of cannabis retailers (e.g., Yelp) or 2) government-maintained registries. Characterizing the operating status and location information accuracy of cannabis retailer data sources on a state-by-state level can inform research examining the health implications of cannabis legalization policies. This study ascertained cannabis retailer name and location from webservices and government-maintained registries for 26 states and the District of Columbia legalizing cannabis sales in 2019. Validation subsamples were created using state-level sequential sampling. Phone surveys were conducted by trained researchers for webservice samples (n=790, November 2019 - May 2020) and government-maintained registry (n=859, February - June 2020) to ascertain information about operating status and location. Accuracy was calculated as the percent agreement among subsample and phone survey data. For operating status and location, webservice derived data was 78% (614/790) and 79% (484/611) accurate, whereas government-maintained registry derived data was 76% (657/859) and 95% (622/655) accurate, respectively. Fifty-nine percent (15/27) of states and the District of Columbia had over 80% accuracy for operating status and 48% (13/27) states had over 80% accuracy for location information with both data sources. However, government-maintained registry derived information was more accurate in 33% (9/27) states for operating status and 41% (11/27) states for location information. Both data sources had similar operating status accuracy. Research using spatial analysis may prefer government-maintained registry derived data due to high location information accuracy, whereas studies looking at broad trends across states may prefer webservice derived. State level COVID-19 restrictions had minimal impact on ascertainment of cannabis retailer operating status and location information via phone survey derived from webservices and government-maintained registries.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":72520,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Cannabis (Albuquerque, N.M.)\",\"volume\":\"6 2\",\"pages\":\"133-148\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-07-05\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://ftp.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pub/pmc/oa_pdf/8e/55/rsmj.6.2.133.PMC10361797.pdf\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Cannabis (Albuquerque, N.M.)\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.26828/cannabis/2023/000148\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2023/1/1 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"eCollection\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Cannabis (Albuquerque, N.M.)","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.26828/cannabis/2023/000148","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2023/1/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

用于调查大麻地域准入情况的大麻零售商位置通常有两种来源:1) 提供大麻零售商位置的网络服务(如 Yelp)或 2) 政府维护的登记簿。对各州大麻零售商数据源的运营状况和位置信息准确性进行分析,可为研究大麻合法化政策对健康的影响提供参考。本研究从网络服务和政府维护的登记簿中确定了 2019 年大麻销售合法化的 26 个州和哥伦比亚特区的大麻零售商名称和位置。利用州级顺序抽样创建了验证子样本。训练有素的研究人员对网络服务样本(n=790,2019 年 11 月至 2020 年 5 月)和政府维护的登记册(n=859,2020 年 2 月至 6 月)进行了电话调查,以确定有关经营状况和地点的信息。准确度按子样本数据与电话调查数据的一致率计算。在运营状态和地点方面,网络服务得出的数据准确率分别为 78% (614/790)和 79% (484/611),而政府维护的登记册得出的数据准确率分别为 76% (657/859) 和 95% (622/655)。59%(15/27)的州和哥伦比亚特区在运营状态方面的准确率超过 80%,48%(13/27)的州在位置信息方面的准确率超过 80%。然而,在 33%(9/27 个州)的运营状态和 41%(11/27 个州)的位置信息中,由政府维护的登记册衍生信息更为准确。两种数据源的运行状况准确性相似。由于位置信息的准确性较高,使用空间分析的研究可能更倾向于使用政府维护的登记册衍生数据,而研究各州广泛趋势的研究可能更倾向于使用网络服务衍生数据。州一级的 COVID-19 限制对通过电话调查确定大麻零售商经营状况和位置信息的影响微乎其微,而电话调查的数据来源于网络服务和政府维护的登记簿。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。

Accuracy Differences in Cannabis Retailer Information Ascertained from Webservices and Government-Maintained State Registries Across US States Legalizing the Sale of Cannabis in 2019.

Accuracy Differences in Cannabis Retailer Information Ascertained from Webservices and Government-Maintained State Registries Across US States Legalizing the Sale of Cannabis in 2019.

Cannabis retailer locations used to investigate geographic cannabis access are frequently ascertained from two sources: 1) webservices which provide locations of cannabis retailers (e.g., Yelp) or 2) government-maintained registries. Characterizing the operating status and location information accuracy of cannabis retailer data sources on a state-by-state level can inform research examining the health implications of cannabis legalization policies. This study ascertained cannabis retailer name and location from webservices and government-maintained registries for 26 states and the District of Columbia legalizing cannabis sales in 2019. Validation subsamples were created using state-level sequential sampling. Phone surveys were conducted by trained researchers for webservice samples (n=790, November 2019 - May 2020) and government-maintained registry (n=859, February - June 2020) to ascertain information about operating status and location. Accuracy was calculated as the percent agreement among subsample and phone survey data. For operating status and location, webservice derived data was 78% (614/790) and 79% (484/611) accurate, whereas government-maintained registry derived data was 76% (657/859) and 95% (622/655) accurate, respectively. Fifty-nine percent (15/27) of states and the District of Columbia had over 80% accuracy for operating status and 48% (13/27) states had over 80% accuracy for location information with both data sources. However, government-maintained registry derived information was more accurate in 33% (9/27) states for operating status and 41% (11/27) states for location information. Both data sources had similar operating status accuracy. Research using spatial analysis may prefer government-maintained registry derived data due to high location information accuracy, whereas studies looking at broad trends across states may prefer webservice derived. State level COVID-19 restrictions had minimal impact on ascertainment of cannabis retailer operating status and location information via phone survey derived from webservices and government-maintained registries.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信