圆捆喂料机的效率:墓碑与干草节省器的比较。

Q3 Veterinary
Kendall A Hyde, Annabelle Altman, Robin Banasek, Melba O Gastal, Eduardo L Gastal
{"title":"圆捆喂料机的效率:墓碑与干草节省器的比较。","authors":"Kendall A Hyde,&nbsp;Annabelle Altman,&nbsp;Robin Banasek,&nbsp;Melba O Gastal,&nbsp;Eduardo L Gastal","doi":"10.1294/jes.34.51","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Hay wastage when feeding round bales due to contamination, deterioration, and animal refusal can accrue large financial losses for farmers. The present study investigated the efficiency of the conventional Tombstone-style feeder system compared to the Hay Saver feeder system to reduce hay wastage in feeding round hay bales. Mares were distributed equally into two groups, Tombstone and Hay Saver, and fed six bales per group over 48 days. Hay wastage was collected daily, dried, and weighed, while the mares were weighed weekly. Overall, the Hay Saver feeder showed less hay wastage, higher mean mare weight, and higher consumption rate per horse. The results of this study indicated that the Hay Saver feeder system had higher efficiency compared to the Tombstone feeder system.</p>","PeriodicalId":35701,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Equine Science","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-06-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://ftp.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pub/pmc/oa_pdf/ff/65/jes-34-051.PMC10315636.pdf","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Efficiency of round bale feeders: comparison of Tombstone versus Hay Saver.\",\"authors\":\"Kendall A Hyde,&nbsp;Annabelle Altman,&nbsp;Robin Banasek,&nbsp;Melba O Gastal,&nbsp;Eduardo L Gastal\",\"doi\":\"10.1294/jes.34.51\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p>Hay wastage when feeding round bales due to contamination, deterioration, and animal refusal can accrue large financial losses for farmers. The present study investigated the efficiency of the conventional Tombstone-style feeder system compared to the Hay Saver feeder system to reduce hay wastage in feeding round hay bales. Mares were distributed equally into two groups, Tombstone and Hay Saver, and fed six bales per group over 48 days. Hay wastage was collected daily, dried, and weighed, while the mares were weighed weekly. Overall, the Hay Saver feeder showed less hay wastage, higher mean mare weight, and higher consumption rate per horse. The results of this study indicated that the Hay Saver feeder system had higher efficiency compared to the Tombstone feeder system.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":35701,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of Equine Science\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-06-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://ftp.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pub/pmc/oa_pdf/ff/65/jes-34-051.PMC10315636.pdf\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of Equine Science\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1294/jes.34.51\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"Veterinary\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Equine Science","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1294/jes.34.51","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"Veterinary","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

饲养圆捆干草时由于污染、变质和动物拒绝而造成的干草浪费会给农民带来巨大的经济损失。本研究调查了传统墓碑式给料系统与干草节育器给料系统的效率,以减少喂圆草包时的干草浪费。将母马平均分为墓碑组和干草拯救组,每组饲喂6包,共饲喂48 d。每天收集干草,晒干并称重,而母马每周称重。总体而言,干草节省饲料显示出较少的干草浪费,更高的平均母马体重,和更高的每匹马消耗率。本研究结果表明,干草节省给料系统比墓碑给料系统具有更高的效率。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。

Efficiency of round bale feeders: comparison of Tombstone versus Hay Saver.

Efficiency of round bale feeders: comparison of Tombstone versus Hay Saver.

Efficiency of round bale feeders: comparison of Tombstone versus Hay Saver.

Hay wastage when feeding round bales due to contamination, deterioration, and animal refusal can accrue large financial losses for farmers. The present study investigated the efficiency of the conventional Tombstone-style feeder system compared to the Hay Saver feeder system to reduce hay wastage in feeding round hay bales. Mares were distributed equally into two groups, Tombstone and Hay Saver, and fed six bales per group over 48 days. Hay wastage was collected daily, dried, and weighed, while the mares were weighed weekly. Overall, the Hay Saver feeder showed less hay wastage, higher mean mare weight, and higher consumption rate per horse. The results of this study indicated that the Hay Saver feeder system had higher efficiency compared to the Tombstone feeder system.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Journal of Equine Science
Journal of Equine Science Veterinary-Equine
CiteScore
1.60
自引率
0.00%
发文量
9
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信