烟草业的干预破坏了孟加拉国图形健康警示的制定和实施。

IF 4 2区 医学 Q1 PUBLIC, ENVIRONMENTAL & OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH
Md Hasan Shahriar, Md Mehedi Hasan, Md Shahedul Alam, Britta K Matthes, Anna B Gilmore, A B M Zubair
{"title":"烟草业的干预破坏了孟加拉国图形健康警示的制定和实施。","authors":"Md Hasan Shahriar, Md Mehedi Hasan, Md Shahedul Alam, Britta K Matthes, Anna B Gilmore, A B M Zubair","doi":"10.1136/tc-2022-057538","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>In Bangladesh, the 2013 Amendment of the Tobacco Control Act made graphic health warnings (GHWs) on the <i>upper</i> 50% of all tobacco packs obligatory. However, at the time of writing (May 2022), GHWs are still being printed on the <i>lower</i> 50% of packs. This paper seeks to explore how the tobacco industry undermined the development and implementation of GHWs in Bangladesh, a country known for a high level of tobacco industry interference (TII) that has rarely been examined in the peer-reviewed literature.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Analysis of print and electronic media articles and documents.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Cigarette companies actively opposed GHWs, while bidi companies did not. The primary strategy used to influence the formulation and delay the implementation of GHWs was direct lobbying by the Bangladesh Cigarette Manufacturers' Association and British American Tobacco Bangladesh. Their arguments stressed the economic benefits of tobacco to Bangladesh and sought to create confusion about the impact of GHWs, for example, claiming that GHWs would obscure tax banderols, thus threatening revenue collection. They also claimed technical barriers to implementation-that new machinery would be needed-leading to delays. Tensions between government bodies were identified, one of which (National Board of Revenue)-seemingly close to cigarette companies and representing their arguments-sought to influence others to adopt industry-preferred positions. Finally, although tobacco control advocates were partially successful in counteracting TII, one self-proclaimed tobacco control group, whose nature remains unclear, threatened the otherwise united approach.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>The strategies cigarette companies used closely resemble key techniques from the well-evidenced tobacco industry playbook. The study underlines the importance of continuing monitoring and investigations into industry conduct and suspicious actors. Prioritising the implementation of WHO Framework Convention on Tobacco Control Article 5.3 is crucial for advancing tobacco control, particularly in places like Bangladesh, where close government-industry links exist.</p>","PeriodicalId":23145,"journal":{"name":"Tobacco Control","volume":" ","pages":"587-595"},"PeriodicalIF":4.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-09-25","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11503176/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Tobacco industry interference to undermine the development and implementation of graphic health warnings in Bangladesh.\",\"authors\":\"Md Hasan Shahriar, Md Mehedi Hasan, Md Shahedul Alam, Britta K Matthes, Anna B Gilmore, A B M Zubair\",\"doi\":\"10.1136/tc-2022-057538\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Background: </strong>In Bangladesh, the 2013 Amendment of the Tobacco Control Act made graphic health warnings (GHWs) on the <i>upper</i> 50% of all tobacco packs obligatory. However, at the time of writing (May 2022), GHWs are still being printed on the <i>lower</i> 50% of packs. This paper seeks to explore how the tobacco industry undermined the development and implementation of GHWs in Bangladesh, a country known for a high level of tobacco industry interference (TII) that has rarely been examined in the peer-reviewed literature.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Analysis of print and electronic media articles and documents.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Cigarette companies actively opposed GHWs, while bidi companies did not. The primary strategy used to influence the formulation and delay the implementation of GHWs was direct lobbying by the Bangladesh Cigarette Manufacturers' Association and British American Tobacco Bangladesh. Their arguments stressed the economic benefits of tobacco to Bangladesh and sought to create confusion about the impact of GHWs, for example, claiming that GHWs would obscure tax banderols, thus threatening revenue collection. They also claimed technical barriers to implementation-that new machinery would be needed-leading to delays. Tensions between government bodies were identified, one of which (National Board of Revenue)-seemingly close to cigarette companies and representing their arguments-sought to influence others to adopt industry-preferred positions. Finally, although tobacco control advocates were partially successful in counteracting TII, one self-proclaimed tobacco control group, whose nature remains unclear, threatened the otherwise united approach.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>The strategies cigarette companies used closely resemble key techniques from the well-evidenced tobacco industry playbook. The study underlines the importance of continuing monitoring and investigations into industry conduct and suspicious actors. Prioritising the implementation of WHO Framework Convention on Tobacco Control Article 5.3 is crucial for advancing tobacco control, particularly in places like Bangladesh, where close government-industry links exist.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":23145,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Tobacco Control\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"587-595\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":4.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-09-25\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11503176/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Tobacco Control\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1136/tc-2022-057538\",\"RegionNum\":2,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"PUBLIC, ENVIRONMENTAL & OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Tobacco Control","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1136/tc-2022-057538","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"PUBLIC, ENVIRONMENTAL & OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

背景:在孟加拉国,2013年《烟草控制法修正案》规定,所有烟草包装上部50%的位置必须印制图形健康警示(GHWs)。然而,在撰写本文时(2022 年 5 月),图形健康警示仍印制在烟草包装的下半部分。本文旨在探讨烟草行业是如何破坏孟加拉国 GHWs 的制定和实施的,孟加拉国以烟草行业的高度干预(TII)而闻名,而同行评议的文献很少对其进行研究:方法:分析印刷和电子媒体的文章和文件:结果:卷烟公司积极反对 GHW,而比迪烟公司则没有。孟加拉国卷烟制造商协会和英美烟草孟加拉国公司直接进行游说,是影响制定和推迟实施 GHW 的主要策略。他们的论点强调了烟草给孟加拉国带来的经济利益,并试图混淆 GHWs 的影响,例如,声称 GHWs 会掩盖 Banderols 税收,从而威胁税收。他们还声称实施过程中存在技术障碍--需要新的机械设备,从而导致延误。政府机构之间关系紧张,其中一个机构(国家税务局)似乎与卷烟公司关系密切,代表了卷烟公司的观点,试图影响其他机构采取行业倾向的立场。最后,尽管烟草控制倡导者在抵制 TII 方面取得了部分成功,但一个自称为烟草控制团体的组织(其性质尚不清楚)威胁到了原本团结一致的做法:结论:卷烟公司所使用的策略与烟草行业游戏规则中的关键技术非常相似。本研究强调了继续监督和调查烟草行业行为及可疑参与者的重要性。优先执行《世界卫生组织烟草控制框架公约》第 5.3 条对于推进烟草控制至关重要,尤其是在孟加拉国这样政府与烟草行业联系紧密的地方。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Tobacco industry interference to undermine the development and implementation of graphic health warnings in Bangladesh.

Background: In Bangladesh, the 2013 Amendment of the Tobacco Control Act made graphic health warnings (GHWs) on the upper 50% of all tobacco packs obligatory. However, at the time of writing (May 2022), GHWs are still being printed on the lower 50% of packs. This paper seeks to explore how the tobacco industry undermined the development and implementation of GHWs in Bangladesh, a country known for a high level of tobacco industry interference (TII) that has rarely been examined in the peer-reviewed literature.

Methods: Analysis of print and electronic media articles and documents.

Results: Cigarette companies actively opposed GHWs, while bidi companies did not. The primary strategy used to influence the formulation and delay the implementation of GHWs was direct lobbying by the Bangladesh Cigarette Manufacturers' Association and British American Tobacco Bangladesh. Their arguments stressed the economic benefits of tobacco to Bangladesh and sought to create confusion about the impact of GHWs, for example, claiming that GHWs would obscure tax banderols, thus threatening revenue collection. They also claimed technical barriers to implementation-that new machinery would be needed-leading to delays. Tensions between government bodies were identified, one of which (National Board of Revenue)-seemingly close to cigarette companies and representing their arguments-sought to influence others to adopt industry-preferred positions. Finally, although tobacco control advocates were partially successful in counteracting TII, one self-proclaimed tobacco control group, whose nature remains unclear, threatened the otherwise united approach.

Conclusions: The strategies cigarette companies used closely resemble key techniques from the well-evidenced tobacco industry playbook. The study underlines the importance of continuing monitoring and investigations into industry conduct and suspicious actors. Prioritising the implementation of WHO Framework Convention on Tobacco Control Article 5.3 is crucial for advancing tobacco control, particularly in places like Bangladesh, where close government-industry links exist.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Tobacco Control
Tobacco Control 医学-公共卫生、环境卫生与职业卫生
CiteScore
9.10
自引率
26.90%
发文量
223
审稿时长
6-12 weeks
期刊介绍: Tobacco Control is an international peer-reviewed journal covering the nature and consequences of tobacco use worldwide; tobacco''s effects on population health, the economy, the environment, and society; efforts to prevent and control the global tobacco epidemic through population-level education and policy changes; the ethical dimensions of tobacco control policies; and the activities of the tobacco industry and its allies.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信