为期一年的多中心随机对照试验比较OT Equator®和Locator附着体在两个种植体上保留早期加载种植覆盖义齿的效果。

IF 3 Q3 MATERIALS SCIENCE, BIOMATERIALS
Marco Tallarico, Luca Fiorillo, Marco Montanari, Roberto Scrascia, Corina Marilena Cristache, Emiliano Ferrari, Alessio Casucci, Erta Xhanari, Saturnino Marco Lupi, Irene Ieria, Edoardo Baldoni, Ruggero Rodriguez Y Baena, Gabriele Cervino
{"title":"为期一年的多中心随机对照试验比较OT Equator®和Locator附着体在两个种植体上保留早期加载种植覆盖义齿的效果。","authors":"Marco Tallarico,&nbsp;Luca Fiorillo,&nbsp;Marco Montanari,&nbsp;Roberto Scrascia,&nbsp;Corina Marilena Cristache,&nbsp;Emiliano Ferrari,&nbsp;Alessio Casucci,&nbsp;Erta Xhanari,&nbsp;Saturnino Marco Lupi,&nbsp;Irene Ieria,&nbsp;Edoardo Baldoni,&nbsp;Ruggero Rodriguez Y Baena,&nbsp;Gabriele Cervino","doi":"10.1155/2023/2745262","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>This investigation aimed to compare the effectiveness of the OT Equator® (Rhein, Bologna, Italy) and the Locator attachment systems used to retain early loaded implant-retained overdentures. This study was designed as a multicenter randomised controlled trial of parallel groups. After implant placement, the patients were randomised to receive OT Equator® attachments in the test group or Locator attachments in the control group. The outcome measures were implant and prosthetic success and survival rates, any biological and technical complication, marginal bone loss, patients' satisfaction, and periodontal parameters. Overall, 42 patients were consecutively enrolled and treated. One implant was lost in the control group, while no implants were lost in the test group. No prostheses failed in both groups. Only a few complications were experienced in both groups. The main was represented by loss of retention of the attachments (retentive caps). The OT Equator® attachment showed statistically lower periodontal parameters. In conclusion, both attachment systems were suitable for overdenture implant retention.</p>","PeriodicalId":13704,"journal":{"name":"International Journal of Biomaterials","volume":"2023 ","pages":"2745262"},"PeriodicalIF":3.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10348852/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"One-Year Multicenter Randomised Controlled Trial Comparing OT Equator® and Locator Attachments to Retain an Early Loaded Implant Overdenture on Two Implants.\",\"authors\":\"Marco Tallarico,&nbsp;Luca Fiorillo,&nbsp;Marco Montanari,&nbsp;Roberto Scrascia,&nbsp;Corina Marilena Cristache,&nbsp;Emiliano Ferrari,&nbsp;Alessio Casucci,&nbsp;Erta Xhanari,&nbsp;Saturnino Marco Lupi,&nbsp;Irene Ieria,&nbsp;Edoardo Baldoni,&nbsp;Ruggero Rodriguez Y Baena,&nbsp;Gabriele Cervino\",\"doi\":\"10.1155/2023/2745262\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p>This investigation aimed to compare the effectiveness of the OT Equator® (Rhein, Bologna, Italy) and the Locator attachment systems used to retain early loaded implant-retained overdentures. This study was designed as a multicenter randomised controlled trial of parallel groups. After implant placement, the patients were randomised to receive OT Equator® attachments in the test group or Locator attachments in the control group. The outcome measures were implant and prosthetic success and survival rates, any biological and technical complication, marginal bone loss, patients' satisfaction, and periodontal parameters. Overall, 42 patients were consecutively enrolled and treated. One implant was lost in the control group, while no implants were lost in the test group. No prostheses failed in both groups. Only a few complications were experienced in both groups. The main was represented by loss of retention of the attachments (retentive caps). The OT Equator® attachment showed statistically lower periodontal parameters. In conclusion, both attachment systems were suitable for overdenture implant retention.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":13704,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"International Journal of Biomaterials\",\"volume\":\"2023 \",\"pages\":\"2745262\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":3.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-01-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10348852/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"International Journal of Biomaterials\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1155/2023/2745262\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"MATERIALS SCIENCE, BIOMATERIALS\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"International Journal of Biomaterials","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1155/2023/2745262","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"MATERIALS SCIENCE, BIOMATERIALS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

本研究旨在比较OT Equator®(Rhein, Bologna, Italy)和Locator附着系统用于固定早期装载种植固位覆盖义齿的有效性。本研究设计为平行组的多中心随机对照试验。植入后,患者被随机分配到试验组接受OT Equator®附着体治疗,对照组接受Locator附着体治疗。结果测量包括种植体和假体的成功率和存活率、任何生物和技术并发症、边缘骨质流失、患者满意度和牙周参数。总的来说,42名患者连续入组并接受治疗。对照组丢失1颗种植体,试验组未丢失种植体。两组均无假体失败。两组患者均未发生并发症。主要表现为失去附着物的保留(保留帽)。OT Equator®贴合物在统计学上显示出更低的牙周参数。综上所述,两种附着体均适用于覆盖义齿种植体固位。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。

One-Year Multicenter Randomised Controlled Trial Comparing OT Equator® and Locator Attachments to Retain an Early Loaded Implant Overdenture on Two Implants.

One-Year Multicenter Randomised Controlled Trial Comparing OT Equator® and Locator Attachments to Retain an Early Loaded Implant Overdenture on Two Implants.

One-Year Multicenter Randomised Controlled Trial Comparing OT Equator® and Locator Attachments to Retain an Early Loaded Implant Overdenture on Two Implants.

One-Year Multicenter Randomised Controlled Trial Comparing OT Equator® and Locator Attachments to Retain an Early Loaded Implant Overdenture on Two Implants.

This investigation aimed to compare the effectiveness of the OT Equator® (Rhein, Bologna, Italy) and the Locator attachment systems used to retain early loaded implant-retained overdentures. This study was designed as a multicenter randomised controlled trial of parallel groups. After implant placement, the patients were randomised to receive OT Equator® attachments in the test group or Locator attachments in the control group. The outcome measures were implant and prosthetic success and survival rates, any biological and technical complication, marginal bone loss, patients' satisfaction, and periodontal parameters. Overall, 42 patients were consecutively enrolled and treated. One implant was lost in the control group, while no implants were lost in the test group. No prostheses failed in both groups. Only a few complications were experienced in both groups. The main was represented by loss of retention of the attachments (retentive caps). The OT Equator® attachment showed statistically lower periodontal parameters. In conclusion, both attachment systems were suitable for overdenture implant retention.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
International Journal of Biomaterials
International Journal of Biomaterials MATERIALS SCIENCE, BIOMATERIALS-
CiteScore
4.30
自引率
3.20%
发文量
50
审稿时长
21 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信