慢性冠脉综合征患者孤立性口对角狭窄的长期观察研究。

IF 0.9 Q4 CARDIAC & CARDIOVASCULAR SYSTEMS
Akın Torun, Burak Acar, Göksel Kahraman, Ertan Ural, Teoman Kılıç, Umut Çelikyurt, Aysen Ağır
{"title":"慢性冠脉综合征患者孤立性口对角狭窄的长期观察研究。","authors":"Akın Torun, Burak Acar, Göksel Kahraman, Ertan Ural, Teoman Kılıç, Umut Çelikyurt, Aysen Ağır","doi":"10.5543/tkda.2023.74422","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>Isolated ostial diagonal stenoses are very rare lesions in which percutaneous intervention could cause significant vessel compromise, and the long-term results have been reported in a few studies. This study sought the characteristics and long-term follow-up of the patients with isolated osteal diagonal stenosis regarding percutaneous coronary intervention and presence of angina.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>The study was an observational retrospective study conducted between January 2014 and December 2020. A total of 9769 patients who underwent coronary angiography were analyzed, and 87 patients had isolated diagonal stenosis. The patients were evaluated according to treatment modality and angina severity in long-term pattern.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Median follow-up time was 36 months. A total of 54 (83.1%) patients were followed up with only medical treatment, and 11 (16.9%) patients underwent revascularization in addition to medical treatment. The degree of stenosis of the diagonal artery was significantly higher in the percutaneous coronary intervention group than medical group (P = 0.002) and the patients with wider reference diameter of diagonal artery complaint of more angina (P = 0.007). Class I angina was significantly higher in percutaneous coronary intervention group than medical and the patients with no angina were significantly higher in medical group than percutaneous coronary intervention group.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Percutaneous coronary intervention was mainly performed for diagonal arteries with a higher degree of stenosis; however, the patients who underwent percutaneous coronary intervention had angina more than 50% rates. Furthermore, the patients with ongoing angina had a larger diameter of the diagonal artery regardless of the type of treatment.</p>","PeriodicalId":46993,"journal":{"name":"Turk Kardiyoloji Dernegi Arsivi-Archives of the Turkish Society of Cardiology","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.9000,"publicationDate":"2023-07-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Long-Term Observational Study of the Isolated Ostial Diagonal Stenosis in Patients with Chronic Coronary Syndrome.\",\"authors\":\"Akın Torun, Burak Acar, Göksel Kahraman, Ertan Ural, Teoman Kılıç, Umut Çelikyurt, Aysen Ağır\",\"doi\":\"10.5543/tkda.2023.74422\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>Isolated ostial diagonal stenoses are very rare lesions in which percutaneous intervention could cause significant vessel compromise, and the long-term results have been reported in a few studies. This study sought the characteristics and long-term follow-up of the patients with isolated osteal diagonal stenosis regarding percutaneous coronary intervention and presence of angina.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>The study was an observational retrospective study conducted between January 2014 and December 2020. A total of 9769 patients who underwent coronary angiography were analyzed, and 87 patients had isolated diagonal stenosis. The patients were evaluated according to treatment modality and angina severity in long-term pattern.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Median follow-up time was 36 months. A total of 54 (83.1%) patients were followed up with only medical treatment, and 11 (16.9%) patients underwent revascularization in addition to medical treatment. The degree of stenosis of the diagonal artery was significantly higher in the percutaneous coronary intervention group than medical group (P = 0.002) and the patients with wider reference diameter of diagonal artery complaint of more angina (P = 0.007). Class I angina was significantly higher in percutaneous coronary intervention group than medical and the patients with no angina were significantly higher in medical group than percutaneous coronary intervention group.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Percutaneous coronary intervention was mainly performed for diagonal arteries with a higher degree of stenosis; however, the patients who underwent percutaneous coronary intervention had angina more than 50% rates. Furthermore, the patients with ongoing angina had a larger diameter of the diagonal artery regardless of the type of treatment.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":46993,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Turk Kardiyoloji Dernegi Arsivi-Archives of the Turkish Society of Cardiology\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.9000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-07-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Turk Kardiyoloji Dernegi Arsivi-Archives of the Turkish Society of Cardiology\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.5543/tkda.2023.74422\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q4\",\"JCRName\":\"CARDIAC & CARDIOVASCULAR SYSTEMS\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Turk Kardiyoloji Dernegi Arsivi-Archives of the Turkish Society of Cardiology","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.5543/tkda.2023.74422","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"CARDIAC & CARDIOVASCULAR SYSTEMS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

目的:孤立性口对角狭窄是一种非常罕见的病变,经皮介入治疗可导致严重的血管损害,少数研究报道了其长期结果。本研究旨在探讨经皮冠状动脉介入治疗和心绞痛的孤立性骨对角狭窄患者的特点和长期随访。方法:2014年1月至2020年12月进行观察性回顾性研究。我们共分析了9769例冠状动脉造影患者,其中87例患者有孤立的对角狭窄。根据治疗方式和长期心绞痛严重程度对患者进行评价。结果:中位随访时间36个月。54例(83.1%)患者仅接受药物治疗,11例(16.9%)患者在接受药物治疗的同时接受了血运重建术。经皮冠状动脉介入治疗组对角动脉狭窄程度明显高于药物组(P = 0.002),对角动脉参考直径较宽的患者心绞痛发生率较高(P = 0.007)。经皮冠状动脉介入治疗组ⅰ类心绞痛发生率明显高于药物组,无心绞痛发生率明显高于药物组。结论:经皮冠状动脉介入治疗主要针对狭窄程度较高的对角动脉;然而,经皮冠状动脉介入治疗的患者心绞痛发生率超过50%。此外,无论治疗方式如何,持续心绞痛患者的斜动脉直径都较大。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Long-Term Observational Study of the Isolated Ostial Diagonal Stenosis in Patients with Chronic Coronary Syndrome.

Objective: Isolated ostial diagonal stenoses are very rare lesions in which percutaneous intervention could cause significant vessel compromise, and the long-term results have been reported in a few studies. This study sought the characteristics and long-term follow-up of the patients with isolated osteal diagonal stenosis regarding percutaneous coronary intervention and presence of angina.

Methods: The study was an observational retrospective study conducted between January 2014 and December 2020. A total of 9769 patients who underwent coronary angiography were analyzed, and 87 patients had isolated diagonal stenosis. The patients were evaluated according to treatment modality and angina severity in long-term pattern.

Results: Median follow-up time was 36 months. A total of 54 (83.1%) patients were followed up with only medical treatment, and 11 (16.9%) patients underwent revascularization in addition to medical treatment. The degree of stenosis of the diagonal artery was significantly higher in the percutaneous coronary intervention group than medical group (P = 0.002) and the patients with wider reference diameter of diagonal artery complaint of more angina (P = 0.007). Class I angina was significantly higher in percutaneous coronary intervention group than medical and the patients with no angina were significantly higher in medical group than percutaneous coronary intervention group.

Conclusion: Percutaneous coronary intervention was mainly performed for diagonal arteries with a higher degree of stenosis; however, the patients who underwent percutaneous coronary intervention had angina more than 50% rates. Furthermore, the patients with ongoing angina had a larger diameter of the diagonal artery regardless of the type of treatment.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
1.30
自引率
12.50%
发文量
124
审稿时长
32 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信