TL-RS联合入路:乙状窦周围360度手术的优缺点。

IF 0.9 4区 医学 Q3 Medicine
Maarten Kleijwegt, Radboud Koot, Andel van der Mey, Erik Hensen, Martijn Malessy
{"title":"TL-RS联合入路:乙状窦周围360度手术的优缺点。","authors":"Maarten Kleijwegt,&nbsp;Radboud Koot,&nbsp;Andel van der Mey,&nbsp;Erik Hensen,&nbsp;Martijn Malessy","doi":"10.1055/a-1793-7925","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p><b>Objective</b>  To highlight the advantages and disadvantages of the combined translabyrinthine (TL) and classic retrosigmoid (RS) approaches. <b>Design</b>  Retrospective chart review. <b>Setting</b>  National tertiary referral center for skull base pathology. <b>Participants</b>  Twenty-two patients with very large cerebellopontine angle tumors were resected using the combined TL-RS approach. <b>Main Outcome Measures</b>  Preoperative patient characteristics including age, sex, and hearing loss. Tumor characteristics, pathology, and size. Intraoperative outcome: tumor removal. Postoperative outcomes included facial nerve function, residual tumor growth, and neurological deficits. <b>Results</b>  Thirteen patients had schwannoma, eight had meningioma, and one had both. The mean age was 47 years, mean tumor size was 39 × 32 × 35 mm (anterior-posterior, medial-lateral, craniocaudal), and mean follow-up period was 80 months. Tumor control was achieved in 13 patients (59%), and 9 (41%) had residual tumor growth that required additional treatment. Seventeen patients (77%) had postoperative House-Brackmann (H-B) facial nerve function grades I to II, one had H-B grade III, one H-B grade V, and three H-B grade VI. <b>Conclusion</b>  Combining TL and RS approaches may be helpful in safely removing large meningiomas and schwannomas in selected cases. This valuable technique should be considered when sufficient exposure cannot be achieved with the TL or RS approach alone.</p>","PeriodicalId":16513,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Neurological Surgery Part B: Skull Base","volume":"84 3","pages":"288-295"},"PeriodicalIF":0.9000,"publicationDate":"2023-06-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://ftp.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pub/pmc/oa_pdf/05/f0/10-1055-a-1793-7925.PMC10171928.pdf","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"The Combined TL-RS Approach: Advantages and Disadvantages of Working 360 Degrees around the Sigmoid Sinus.\",\"authors\":\"Maarten Kleijwegt,&nbsp;Radboud Koot,&nbsp;Andel van der Mey,&nbsp;Erik Hensen,&nbsp;Martijn Malessy\",\"doi\":\"10.1055/a-1793-7925\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p><b>Objective</b>  To highlight the advantages and disadvantages of the combined translabyrinthine (TL) and classic retrosigmoid (RS) approaches. <b>Design</b>  Retrospective chart review. <b>Setting</b>  National tertiary referral center for skull base pathology. <b>Participants</b>  Twenty-two patients with very large cerebellopontine angle tumors were resected using the combined TL-RS approach. <b>Main Outcome Measures</b>  Preoperative patient characteristics including age, sex, and hearing loss. Tumor characteristics, pathology, and size. Intraoperative outcome: tumor removal. Postoperative outcomes included facial nerve function, residual tumor growth, and neurological deficits. <b>Results</b>  Thirteen patients had schwannoma, eight had meningioma, and one had both. The mean age was 47 years, mean tumor size was 39 × 32 × 35 mm (anterior-posterior, medial-lateral, craniocaudal), and mean follow-up period was 80 months. Tumor control was achieved in 13 patients (59%), and 9 (41%) had residual tumor growth that required additional treatment. Seventeen patients (77%) had postoperative House-Brackmann (H-B) facial nerve function grades I to II, one had H-B grade III, one H-B grade V, and three H-B grade VI. <b>Conclusion</b>  Combining TL and RS approaches may be helpful in safely removing large meningiomas and schwannomas in selected cases. This valuable technique should be considered when sufficient exposure cannot be achieved with the TL or RS approach alone.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":16513,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of Neurological Surgery Part B: Skull Base\",\"volume\":\"84 3\",\"pages\":\"288-295\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.9000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-06-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://ftp.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pub/pmc/oa_pdf/05/f0/10-1055-a-1793-7925.PMC10171928.pdf\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of Neurological Surgery Part B: Skull Base\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1055/a-1793-7925\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"Medicine\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Neurological Surgery Part B: Skull Base","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1055/a-1793-7925","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"Medicine","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

目的探讨经迷路入路与乙状结肠后入路联合入路的优缺点。设计回顾图表审查。国家颅底病理三级转诊中心。采用TL-RS联合入路切除了22例特大脑桥小脑角肿瘤。术前患者特征包括年龄、性别和听力损失。肿瘤的特征、病理和大小。术中结果:肿瘤切除。术后结果包括面神经功能、残留肿瘤生长和神经功能缺损。结果神经鞘瘤13例,脑膜瘤8例,两者均有1例。平均年龄47岁,平均肿瘤大小39 × 32 × 35 mm(前后、中外侧、颅侧),平均随访80个月。13例(59%)患者肿瘤得到控制,9例(41%)患者肿瘤残留生长,需要额外治疗。17例(77%)患者术后面神经功能h - brackmann (H-B)评分为I至II级,1例H-B评分为III级,1例H-B评分为V级,3例H-B评分为VI级。结论tlb联合RS入路可在部分病例中安全切除较大的脑膜瘤和神经鞘瘤。当单独使用TL或RS方法无法获得充分暴露时,应考虑使用这种有价值的技术。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。

The Combined TL-RS Approach: Advantages and Disadvantages of Working 360 Degrees around the Sigmoid Sinus.

The Combined TL-RS Approach: Advantages and Disadvantages of Working 360 Degrees around the Sigmoid Sinus.

The Combined TL-RS Approach: Advantages and Disadvantages of Working 360 Degrees around the Sigmoid Sinus.

The Combined TL-RS Approach: Advantages and Disadvantages of Working 360 Degrees around the Sigmoid Sinus.

Objective  To highlight the advantages and disadvantages of the combined translabyrinthine (TL) and classic retrosigmoid (RS) approaches. Design  Retrospective chart review. Setting  National tertiary referral center for skull base pathology. Participants  Twenty-two patients with very large cerebellopontine angle tumors were resected using the combined TL-RS approach. Main Outcome Measures  Preoperative patient characteristics including age, sex, and hearing loss. Tumor characteristics, pathology, and size. Intraoperative outcome: tumor removal. Postoperative outcomes included facial nerve function, residual tumor growth, and neurological deficits. Results  Thirteen patients had schwannoma, eight had meningioma, and one had both. The mean age was 47 years, mean tumor size was 39 × 32 × 35 mm (anterior-posterior, medial-lateral, craniocaudal), and mean follow-up period was 80 months. Tumor control was achieved in 13 patients (59%), and 9 (41%) had residual tumor growth that required additional treatment. Seventeen patients (77%) had postoperative House-Brackmann (H-B) facial nerve function grades I to II, one had H-B grade III, one H-B grade V, and three H-B grade VI. Conclusion  Combining TL and RS approaches may be helpful in safely removing large meningiomas and schwannomas in selected cases. This valuable technique should be considered when sufficient exposure cannot be achieved with the TL or RS approach alone.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
2.20
自引率
0.00%
发文量
516
期刊介绍: The Journal of Neurological Surgery Part B: Skull Base (JNLS B) is a major publication from the world''s leading publisher in neurosurgery. JNLS B currently serves as the official organ of several national and international neurosurgery and skull base societies. JNLS B is a peer-reviewed journal publishing original research, review articles, and technical notes covering all aspects of neurological surgery. The focus of JNLS B includes microsurgery as well as the latest minimally invasive techniques, such as stereotactic-guided surgery, endoscopy, and endovascular procedures. JNLS B is devoted to the techniques and procedures of skull base surgery.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信