肝癌最佳介入治疗:HAIC、TACE还是iTACE?

Q3 Medicine
Naijian Ge , Hongbo Wang , Chengjian He, Xiangdong Wang, Jian Huang, Yefa Yang
{"title":"肝癌最佳介入治疗:HAIC、TACE还是iTACE?","authors":"Naijian Ge ,&nbsp;Hongbo Wang ,&nbsp;Chengjian He,&nbsp;Xiangdong Wang,&nbsp;Jian Huang,&nbsp;Yefa Yang","doi":"10.1016/j.jimed.2023.03.001","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>Primary liver cancer is a common and lethal malignancy in China. Transcatheter arterial chemoembolization (TACE) is globally recognized as the preferred treatment modality for the non-surgical resection of hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC), while transcatheter arterial infusion (TAI) is another effective interventional treatment for HCC. In recent years, hepatic arterial infusion chemotherapy (HAIC) has gained increasing attention as an application-regulated modality for TAI. Owing to the current debate in the medical community regarding the use of HAIC and TACE for the treatment of HCC, the application of both approaches should be considered at a higher level, with a broader perspective and a more normative aspect. Accordingly, we aimed to define the rational combination of liver cancer TAI/HAIC with TACE as infusion transcatheter chemoembolization (iTACE), which suggests that the two interventions are not superior but lead to a mutually beneficial situation. In this review, we sought to discuss the development, specification, application, challenge and innovation, debate, and union of TAI/HAIC and TACE, and the clinical application and latest research on iTACE. We aimed to introduce new concepts of iTACE and expect new breakthroughs in the treatment of liver cancer owing to the combined use of the two major interventional tools.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":33533,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Interventional Medicine","volume":"6 2","pages":"Pages 59-63"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-05-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://ftp.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pub/pmc/oa_pdf/3e/22/main.PMC10318322.pdf","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Optimal interventional treatment for liver cancer: HAIC, TACE or iTACE?\",\"authors\":\"Naijian Ge ,&nbsp;Hongbo Wang ,&nbsp;Chengjian He,&nbsp;Xiangdong Wang,&nbsp;Jian Huang,&nbsp;Yefa Yang\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.jimed.2023.03.001\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><p>Primary liver cancer is a common and lethal malignancy in China. Transcatheter arterial chemoembolization (TACE) is globally recognized as the preferred treatment modality for the non-surgical resection of hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC), while transcatheter arterial infusion (TAI) is another effective interventional treatment for HCC. In recent years, hepatic arterial infusion chemotherapy (HAIC) has gained increasing attention as an application-regulated modality for TAI. Owing to the current debate in the medical community regarding the use of HAIC and TACE for the treatment of HCC, the application of both approaches should be considered at a higher level, with a broader perspective and a more normative aspect. Accordingly, we aimed to define the rational combination of liver cancer TAI/HAIC with TACE as infusion transcatheter chemoembolization (iTACE), which suggests that the two interventions are not superior but lead to a mutually beneficial situation. In this review, we sought to discuss the development, specification, application, challenge and innovation, debate, and union of TAI/HAIC and TACE, and the clinical application and latest research on iTACE. We aimed to introduce new concepts of iTACE and expect new breakthroughs in the treatment of liver cancer owing to the combined use of the two major interventional tools.</p></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":33533,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of Interventional Medicine\",\"volume\":\"6 2\",\"pages\":\"Pages 59-63\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-05-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://ftp.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pub/pmc/oa_pdf/3e/22/main.PMC10318322.pdf\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of Interventional Medicine\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2096360223000121\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"Medicine\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Interventional Medicine","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2096360223000121","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"Medicine","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

原发性肝癌癌症是我国常见的恶性肿瘤。经导管动脉化疗栓塞(TACE)是全球公认的肝细胞癌(HCC)非手术切除的首选治疗方式,而经导管动脉灌注(TAI)是HCC的另一种有效介入治疗方法。近年来,肝动脉灌注化疗(HAIC)作为TAI的一种应用调控模式越来越受到关注。鉴于目前医学界对使用HAIC和TACE治疗HCC的争论,应在更高的层面、更广泛的视角和更规范的方面考虑这两种方法的应用。因此,我们旨在将癌症TAI/HAIC与TACE的合理组合定义为输注经导管化疗栓塞(iTACE),这表明这两种干预并非优越,而是导致互利的情况。在这篇综述中,我们试图讨论TAI/HAIC和TACE的发展、规范、应用、挑战和创新、争论和结合,以及iTACE的临床应用和最新研究。我们的目的是引入iTACE的新概念,并期待由于两种主要介入工具的联合使用,在癌症治疗方面取得新的突破。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Optimal interventional treatment for liver cancer: HAIC, TACE or iTACE?

Primary liver cancer is a common and lethal malignancy in China. Transcatheter arterial chemoembolization (TACE) is globally recognized as the preferred treatment modality for the non-surgical resection of hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC), while transcatheter arterial infusion (TAI) is another effective interventional treatment for HCC. In recent years, hepatic arterial infusion chemotherapy (HAIC) has gained increasing attention as an application-regulated modality for TAI. Owing to the current debate in the medical community regarding the use of HAIC and TACE for the treatment of HCC, the application of both approaches should be considered at a higher level, with a broader perspective and a more normative aspect. Accordingly, we aimed to define the rational combination of liver cancer TAI/HAIC with TACE as infusion transcatheter chemoembolization (iTACE), which suggests that the two interventions are not superior but lead to a mutually beneficial situation. In this review, we sought to discuss the development, specification, application, challenge and innovation, debate, and union of TAI/HAIC and TACE, and the clinical application and latest research on iTACE. We aimed to introduce new concepts of iTACE and expect new breakthroughs in the treatment of liver cancer owing to the combined use of the two major interventional tools.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Journal of Interventional Medicine
Journal of Interventional Medicine Medicine-General Medicine
CiteScore
1.30
自引率
0.00%
发文量
32
审稿时长
68 days
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信