直接口服抗凝剂将是冠状动脉支架植入术后房颤患者的最佳选择:日本人群的回顾性研究

Q4 Medicine
Hiroshi Koiwaya, Nozomi Watanabe, Nehiro Kuriyama, Yoshisato Shibata
{"title":"直接口服抗凝剂将是冠状动脉支架植入术后房颤患者的最佳选择:日本人群的回顾性研究","authors":"Hiroshi Koiwaya,&nbsp;Nozomi Watanabe,&nbsp;Nehiro Kuriyama,&nbsp;Yoshisato Shibata","doi":"10.2739/kurumemedj.MS682015","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>The combination of dual antiplatelet therapy (DAPT) plus warfarin in atrial fibrillation (AF) patients after coronary stenting has been reported to confer a significant risk of bleeding complications. Direct oral anticoagulants (DOAC) reduce the risk of stroke and bleeding complications in AF patients compared to warfarin. The optimal anticoagulation strategy for Japanese non-valvular AF patients after coronary stenting remains unclear.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A total of 3230 patients who underwent coronary stenting were retrospectively reviewed. Of these, 284 cases (8.8%) were complicated by AF. Following coronary stenting, 222 patients received triple antithrombotic therapy (TAT) by DAPT plus oral anticoagulants; 121 patients received DAPT plus warfarin, and 101 patients received DAPT plus DOAC. We compared the clinical data between the two groups.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The median International normalized ratio (INR) in the DAPT plus warfarin group was 1.61. Bleeding complications occurred in both groups. No cerebral infarction occurred in the DAPT plus DOAC group, while 4.1% of the DAPT plus warfarin group experienced cerebral infarction during follow-up (P=0.04). Twelve-month freedom from cerebral infarction, myocardial infarction, and cardiovascular death was significantly higher in the DAPT plus DOAC group than in the DAPT plus warfarin group [100% vs. 93.4%, P=0.009].</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>DOAC might be an optimal selection as an oral anticoagulant for Japanese AF patients who are receiving DAPT after PCI. A larger, longitudinal follow-up should be performed to clarify the clinical advantage of DOAC over warfarin, including among patients who receive single antiplatelet after coronary stent implantation.</p>","PeriodicalId":39559,"journal":{"name":"Kurume Medical Journal","volume":"68 2","pages":"97-106"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-07-03","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Direct Oral Anticoagulants Would Be Best Choice for Atrial Fibrillation Patients After Coronary Stenting: Retrospective Study in a Japanese Population.\",\"authors\":\"Hiroshi Koiwaya,&nbsp;Nozomi Watanabe,&nbsp;Nehiro Kuriyama,&nbsp;Yoshisato Shibata\",\"doi\":\"10.2739/kurumemedj.MS682015\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Background: </strong>The combination of dual antiplatelet therapy (DAPT) plus warfarin in atrial fibrillation (AF) patients after coronary stenting has been reported to confer a significant risk of bleeding complications. Direct oral anticoagulants (DOAC) reduce the risk of stroke and bleeding complications in AF patients compared to warfarin. The optimal anticoagulation strategy for Japanese non-valvular AF patients after coronary stenting remains unclear.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A total of 3230 patients who underwent coronary stenting were retrospectively reviewed. Of these, 284 cases (8.8%) were complicated by AF. Following coronary stenting, 222 patients received triple antithrombotic therapy (TAT) by DAPT plus oral anticoagulants; 121 patients received DAPT plus warfarin, and 101 patients received DAPT plus DOAC. We compared the clinical data between the two groups.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The median International normalized ratio (INR) in the DAPT plus warfarin group was 1.61. Bleeding complications occurred in both groups. No cerebral infarction occurred in the DAPT plus DOAC group, while 4.1% of the DAPT plus warfarin group experienced cerebral infarction during follow-up (P=0.04). Twelve-month freedom from cerebral infarction, myocardial infarction, and cardiovascular death was significantly higher in the DAPT plus DOAC group than in the DAPT plus warfarin group [100% vs. 93.4%, P=0.009].</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>DOAC might be an optimal selection as an oral anticoagulant for Japanese AF patients who are receiving DAPT after PCI. A larger, longitudinal follow-up should be performed to clarify the clinical advantage of DOAC over warfarin, including among patients who receive single antiplatelet after coronary stent implantation.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":39559,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Kurume Medical Journal\",\"volume\":\"68 2\",\"pages\":\"97-106\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-07-03\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Kurume Medical Journal\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.2739/kurumemedj.MS682015\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q4\",\"JCRName\":\"Medicine\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Kurume Medical Journal","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.2739/kurumemedj.MS682015","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"Medicine","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

背景:双重抗血小板治疗(DAPT)加华法林联合治疗房颤(AF)患者冠脉支架植入术后出血并发症的风险显著。与华法林相比,直接口服抗凝剂(DOAC)可降低房颤患者中风和出血并发症的风险。日本非瓣膜性房颤患者冠状动脉支架植入术后的最佳抗凝策略尚不清楚。方法:对3230例冠状动脉支架植入术患者进行回顾性分析。其中,284例(8.8%)并发房颤。冠状动脉支架植入术后,222例患者接受了DAPT联合口服抗凝药物的三联抗血栓治疗(TAT);DAPT联合华法林治疗121例,DAPT联合DOAC治疗101例。比较两组患者的临床资料。结果:DAPT联合华法林组的中位国际标准化比值(INR)为1.61。两组均出现出血并发症。DAPT + DOAC组未发生脑梗死,DAPT +华法林组随访期间脑梗死发生率为4.1% (P=0.04)。DAPT + DOAC组12个月无脑梗死、心肌梗死和心血管死亡发生率明显高于DAPT +华法林组[100% vs. 93.4%, P=0.009]。结论:DOAC可能是日本房颤患者PCI术后DAPT口服抗凝剂的最佳选择。应该进行更大规模的纵向随访,以阐明DOAC优于华法林的临床优势,包括在冠状动脉支架植入后接受单一抗血小板治疗的患者中。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Direct Oral Anticoagulants Would Be Best Choice for Atrial Fibrillation Patients After Coronary Stenting: Retrospective Study in a Japanese Population.

Background: The combination of dual antiplatelet therapy (DAPT) plus warfarin in atrial fibrillation (AF) patients after coronary stenting has been reported to confer a significant risk of bleeding complications. Direct oral anticoagulants (DOAC) reduce the risk of stroke and bleeding complications in AF patients compared to warfarin. The optimal anticoagulation strategy for Japanese non-valvular AF patients after coronary stenting remains unclear.

Methods: A total of 3230 patients who underwent coronary stenting were retrospectively reviewed. Of these, 284 cases (8.8%) were complicated by AF. Following coronary stenting, 222 patients received triple antithrombotic therapy (TAT) by DAPT plus oral anticoagulants; 121 patients received DAPT plus warfarin, and 101 patients received DAPT plus DOAC. We compared the clinical data between the two groups.

Results: The median International normalized ratio (INR) in the DAPT plus warfarin group was 1.61. Bleeding complications occurred in both groups. No cerebral infarction occurred in the DAPT plus DOAC group, while 4.1% of the DAPT plus warfarin group experienced cerebral infarction during follow-up (P=0.04). Twelve-month freedom from cerebral infarction, myocardial infarction, and cardiovascular death was significantly higher in the DAPT plus DOAC group than in the DAPT plus warfarin group [100% vs. 93.4%, P=0.009].

Conclusions: DOAC might be an optimal selection as an oral anticoagulant for Japanese AF patients who are receiving DAPT after PCI. A larger, longitudinal follow-up should be performed to clarify the clinical advantage of DOAC over warfarin, including among patients who receive single antiplatelet after coronary stent implantation.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Kurume Medical Journal
Kurume Medical Journal Medicine-Medicine (all)
CiteScore
0.20
自引率
0.00%
发文量
33
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信