优化interRAI口腔健康科的国际德尔菲研究。

IF 8.3 2区 材料科学 Q1 MATERIALS SCIENCE, MULTIDISCIPLINARY
E Schoebrechts, J de Almeida Mello, P Vandenbulcke, E Palmers, A Declercq, D Declerck, J Duyck
{"title":"优化interRAI口腔健康科的国际德尔菲研究。","authors":"E Schoebrechts,&nbsp;J de Almeida Mello,&nbsp;P Vandenbulcke,&nbsp;E Palmers,&nbsp;A Declercq,&nbsp;D Declerck,&nbsp;J Duyck","doi":"10.1177/00220345231156162","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p><b>Introduction:</b> The oral health (OH) of care-dependent older people is generally poor. Since caregivers are mainly responsible for older people's daily care, they can be considered important intermediaries to improve their OH by performing regular OH assessments. The interRAI instruments are introduced in 37 countries to assess care needs and facilitate care planning across different health care settings. The oral health section (OHS) within the interRAI instrument used in long-term care facilities was optimized for the Belgian context to identify residents who need assistance with daily oral care and/or need to be referred to a dentist. This Delphi study evaluated whether the OHS is also relevant and useful in other countries and modified the OHS accordingly until an international consensus was reached. Participants were experts in OH for older people. During 2 rounds of online questionnaires, experts rated the content, assessment process, triggering of Clinical Assessment Protocols, and accompanying guidelines and instruction videos of the optimized OHS. Based on the experts' comments and suggestions collected during the first round, the OHS was adjusted and presented to the experts in the second round for re-evaluation. The first and second questionnaires were completed by 48 and 42 oral health experts from 29 and 27 countries where the interRAI instruments are introduced, respectively. Five experts from 5 countries where interRAI is not introduced also participated in both rounds. After the second round, a consensus of over 86% was reached on all criteria. International consensus on the OHS was reached, considering national and cultural differences that may affect OH. The next step in this research is to evaluate the assessment process to identify potential barriers and facilitators to achieving reliable OH assessments internationally. Furthermore, the effect of the OHS at the level of the resident and of the caregivers will be evaluated.</p>","PeriodicalId":5,"journal":{"name":"ACS Applied Materials & Interfaces","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":8.3000,"publicationDate":"2023-07-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"International Delphi Study to Optimize the Oral Health Section in interRAI.\",\"authors\":\"E Schoebrechts,&nbsp;J de Almeida Mello,&nbsp;P Vandenbulcke,&nbsp;E Palmers,&nbsp;A Declercq,&nbsp;D Declerck,&nbsp;J Duyck\",\"doi\":\"10.1177/00220345231156162\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p><b>Introduction:</b> The oral health (OH) of care-dependent older people is generally poor. Since caregivers are mainly responsible for older people's daily care, they can be considered important intermediaries to improve their OH by performing regular OH assessments. The interRAI instruments are introduced in 37 countries to assess care needs and facilitate care planning across different health care settings. The oral health section (OHS) within the interRAI instrument used in long-term care facilities was optimized for the Belgian context to identify residents who need assistance with daily oral care and/or need to be referred to a dentist. This Delphi study evaluated whether the OHS is also relevant and useful in other countries and modified the OHS accordingly until an international consensus was reached. Participants were experts in OH for older people. During 2 rounds of online questionnaires, experts rated the content, assessment process, triggering of Clinical Assessment Protocols, and accompanying guidelines and instruction videos of the optimized OHS. Based on the experts' comments and suggestions collected during the first round, the OHS was adjusted and presented to the experts in the second round for re-evaluation. The first and second questionnaires were completed by 48 and 42 oral health experts from 29 and 27 countries where the interRAI instruments are introduced, respectively. Five experts from 5 countries where interRAI is not introduced also participated in both rounds. After the second round, a consensus of over 86% was reached on all criteria. International consensus on the OHS was reached, considering national and cultural differences that may affect OH. The next step in this research is to evaluate the assessment process to identify potential barriers and facilitators to achieving reliable OH assessments internationally. Furthermore, the effect of the OHS at the level of the resident and of the caregivers will be evaluated.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":5,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"ACS Applied Materials & Interfaces\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":8.3000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-07-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"1\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"ACS Applied Materials & Interfaces\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1177/00220345231156162\",\"RegionNum\":2,\"RegionCategory\":\"材料科学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"MATERIALS SCIENCE, MULTIDISCIPLINARY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"ACS Applied Materials & Interfaces","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/00220345231156162","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"材料科学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"MATERIALS SCIENCE, MULTIDISCIPLINARY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

摘要

导读:老年人的口腔健康(OH)普遍较差。由于护理人员主要负责老年人的日常护理,他们可以被认为是重要的中介,通过定期进行OH评估来提高他们的OH。37个国家采用了国际护理需求评估工具,以评估不同卫生保健环境中的护理需求并促进护理规划。长期护理设施中使用的interRAI仪器中的口腔健康科(OHS)针对比利时的情况进行了优化,以确定在日常口腔护理方面需要帮助和/或需要转介给牙医的居民。该德尔菲研究评估了职业健康安全标准在其他国家是否也具有相关性和实用性,并对职业健康安全标准进行了相应的修改,直到达成国际共识。参与者是老年人OH方面的专家。在两轮在线问卷中,专家对优化后的OHS的内容、评估过程、临床评估方案的触发、随附的指南和教学视频进行了评分。根据第一轮专家意见和建议,对OHS进行调整,提交第二轮专家重新评价。第一份和第二份问卷分别由来自29个和27个引进interRAI仪器的国家的48名和42名口腔健康专家完成。来自5个未引入interRAI的国家的5名专家也参加了两轮会议。第二轮投票结束后,各方在各项标准上达成了86%以上的共识。考虑到可能影响健康的国家和文化差异,对健康安全达成了国际共识。本研究的下一步是评估评估过程,以确定在国际上实现可靠的OH评估的潜在障碍和促进因素。此外,OHS在居民和护理人员层面的效果将被评估。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
International Delphi Study to Optimize the Oral Health Section in interRAI.

Introduction: The oral health (OH) of care-dependent older people is generally poor. Since caregivers are mainly responsible for older people's daily care, they can be considered important intermediaries to improve their OH by performing regular OH assessments. The interRAI instruments are introduced in 37 countries to assess care needs and facilitate care planning across different health care settings. The oral health section (OHS) within the interRAI instrument used in long-term care facilities was optimized for the Belgian context to identify residents who need assistance with daily oral care and/or need to be referred to a dentist. This Delphi study evaluated whether the OHS is also relevant and useful in other countries and modified the OHS accordingly until an international consensus was reached. Participants were experts in OH for older people. During 2 rounds of online questionnaires, experts rated the content, assessment process, triggering of Clinical Assessment Protocols, and accompanying guidelines and instruction videos of the optimized OHS. Based on the experts' comments and suggestions collected during the first round, the OHS was adjusted and presented to the experts in the second round for re-evaluation. The first and second questionnaires were completed by 48 and 42 oral health experts from 29 and 27 countries where the interRAI instruments are introduced, respectively. Five experts from 5 countries where interRAI is not introduced also participated in both rounds. After the second round, a consensus of over 86% was reached on all criteria. International consensus on the OHS was reached, considering national and cultural differences that may affect OH. The next step in this research is to evaluate the assessment process to identify potential barriers and facilitators to achieving reliable OH assessments internationally. Furthermore, the effect of the OHS at the level of the resident and of the caregivers will be evaluated.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
ACS Applied Materials & Interfaces
ACS Applied Materials & Interfaces 工程技术-材料科学:综合
CiteScore
16.00
自引率
6.30%
发文量
4978
审稿时长
1.8 months
期刊介绍: ACS Applied Materials & Interfaces is a leading interdisciplinary journal that brings together chemists, engineers, physicists, and biologists to explore the development and utilization of newly-discovered materials and interfacial processes for specific applications. Our journal has experienced remarkable growth since its establishment in 2009, both in terms of the number of articles published and the impact of the research showcased. We are proud to foster a truly global community, with the majority of published articles originating from outside the United States, reflecting the rapid growth of applied research worldwide.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信