{"title":"作者的回应。","authors":"Anna Lavizzari, Chiara Veneroni","doi":"10.1159/000529999","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Dear Editor, We thank Prof. De Luca et al. [1] for the feedback on our systematic review. We acknowledge the growing scientific interest in LUS for individualizing surfactant treatment, and we currently use and appreciate LUS in our clinical practice. However, at the time of our publication LUS for tailoring surfactant therapy had already been appraised elsewhere [2]. Therefore, our project aimed to fill the knowledge gap regarding the “alternatives” for tailoring surfactant therapy [3–7]. Also, we did not aim to compare biochemical and lung function tests with LUS. We do not agree with Prof. De Luca et al. interpretation of our sentences. We believe the analysis of the sentences extracted by the contest in our manuscript is misleading. We reported objective LUS limitations described in the literature without claiming a minor/ major impact on tailoring surfactant administration. A specific search and appraisal of LUS for tailoring surfactant were out of the scope of our project.","PeriodicalId":18924,"journal":{"name":"Neonatology","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":2.6000,"publicationDate":"2023-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Author's Response.\",\"authors\":\"Anna Lavizzari, Chiara Veneroni\",\"doi\":\"10.1159/000529999\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Dear Editor, We thank Prof. De Luca et al. [1] for the feedback on our systematic review. We acknowledge the growing scientific interest in LUS for individualizing surfactant treatment, and we currently use and appreciate LUS in our clinical practice. However, at the time of our publication LUS for tailoring surfactant therapy had already been appraised elsewhere [2]. Therefore, our project aimed to fill the knowledge gap regarding the “alternatives” for tailoring surfactant therapy [3–7]. Also, we did not aim to compare biochemical and lung function tests with LUS. We do not agree with Prof. De Luca et al. interpretation of our sentences. We believe the analysis of the sentences extracted by the contest in our manuscript is misleading. We reported objective LUS limitations described in the literature without claiming a minor/ major impact on tailoring surfactant administration. A specific search and appraisal of LUS for tailoring surfactant were out of the scope of our project.\",\"PeriodicalId\":18924,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Neonatology\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.6000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-01-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Neonatology\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1159/000529999\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"PEDIATRICS\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Neonatology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1159/000529999","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"PEDIATRICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
Dear Editor, We thank Prof. De Luca et al. [1] for the feedback on our systematic review. We acknowledge the growing scientific interest in LUS for individualizing surfactant treatment, and we currently use and appreciate LUS in our clinical practice. However, at the time of our publication LUS for tailoring surfactant therapy had already been appraised elsewhere [2]. Therefore, our project aimed to fill the knowledge gap regarding the “alternatives” for tailoring surfactant therapy [3–7]. Also, we did not aim to compare biochemical and lung function tests with LUS. We do not agree with Prof. De Luca et al. interpretation of our sentences. We believe the analysis of the sentences extracted by the contest in our manuscript is misleading. We reported objective LUS limitations described in the literature without claiming a minor/ major impact on tailoring surfactant administration. A specific search and appraisal of LUS for tailoring surfactant were out of the scope of our project.
期刊介绍:
This highly respected and frequently cited journal is a prime source of information in the area of fetal and neonatal research. Original papers present research on all aspects of neonatology, fetal medicine and developmental biology. These papers encompass both basic science and clinical research including randomized trials, observational studies and epidemiology. Basic science research covers molecular biology, molecular genetics, physiology, biochemistry and pharmacology in fetal and neonatal life. In addition to the classic features the journal accepts papers for the sections Research Briefings and Sources of Neonatal Medicine (historical pieces). Papers reporting results of animal studies should be based upon hypotheses that relate to developmental processes or disorders in the human fetus or neonate.