澳大拉西亚人类遗传学会立场声明:在临床实践和人口健康中使用多基因评分。

IF 1 4区 医学 Q4 GENETICS & HEREDITY
Twin Research and Human Genetics Pub Date : 2023-02-01 Epub Date: 2023-03-23 DOI:10.1017/thg.2023.10
Mary-Anne Young, Tatiane Yanes, Anne E Cust, Kate Dunlop, Sharne Limb, Ainsley J Newson, Rebecca Purvis, Lavvina Thiyagarajan, Rodney J Scott, Kunal Verma, Paul A James, Julia Steinberg
{"title":"澳大拉西亚人类遗传学会立场声明:在临床实践和人口健康中使用多基因评分。","authors":"Mary-Anne Young, Tatiane Yanes, Anne E Cust, Kate Dunlop, Sharne Limb, Ainsley J Newson, Rebecca Purvis, Lavvina Thiyagarajan, Rodney J Scott, Kunal Verma, Paul A James, Julia Steinberg","doi":"10.1017/thg.2023.10","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Considerable progress continues to be made with regards to the value and use of disease associated polygenic scores (PGS). PGS aim to capture a person's genetic liability to a condition, disease, or a trait, combining information across many risk variants and incorporating their effect sizes. They are already available for clinicians and consumers to order in Australasia. However, debate is ongoing over the readiness of this information for integration into clinical practice and population health. This position statement provides the viewpoint of the Human Genetics Society of Australasia (HGSA) regarding the clinical application of disease-associated PGS in both individual patients and population health. The statement details how PGS are calculated, highlights their breadth of possible application, and examines their current challenges and limitations. We consider fundamental lessons from Mendelian genetics and their continuing relevance to PGS, while also acknowledging the distinct elements of PGS. Use of PGS in practice should be evidence based, and the evidence for the associated benefit, while rapidly emerging, remains limited. Given that clinicians and consumers can already order PGS, their current limitations and key issues warrant consideration. PGS can be developed for most complex conditions and traits and can be used across multiple clinical settings and for population health. The HGSA's view is that further evaluation, including regulatory, implementation and health system evaluation are required before PGS can be routinely implemented in the Australasian healthcare system.</p>","PeriodicalId":23446,"journal":{"name":"Twin Research and Human Genetics","volume":"26 1","pages":"40-48"},"PeriodicalIF":1.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-02-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Human Genetics Society of Australasia Position Statement: Use of Polygenic Scores in Clinical Practice and Population Health.\",\"authors\":\"Mary-Anne Young, Tatiane Yanes, Anne E Cust, Kate Dunlop, Sharne Limb, Ainsley J Newson, Rebecca Purvis, Lavvina Thiyagarajan, Rodney J Scott, Kunal Verma, Paul A James, Julia Steinberg\",\"doi\":\"10.1017/thg.2023.10\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p>Considerable progress continues to be made with regards to the value and use of disease associated polygenic scores (PGS). PGS aim to capture a person's genetic liability to a condition, disease, or a trait, combining information across many risk variants and incorporating their effect sizes. They are already available for clinicians and consumers to order in Australasia. However, debate is ongoing over the readiness of this information for integration into clinical practice and population health. This position statement provides the viewpoint of the Human Genetics Society of Australasia (HGSA) regarding the clinical application of disease-associated PGS in both individual patients and population health. The statement details how PGS are calculated, highlights their breadth of possible application, and examines their current challenges and limitations. We consider fundamental lessons from Mendelian genetics and their continuing relevance to PGS, while also acknowledging the distinct elements of PGS. Use of PGS in practice should be evidence based, and the evidence for the associated benefit, while rapidly emerging, remains limited. Given that clinicians and consumers can already order PGS, their current limitations and key issues warrant consideration. PGS can be developed for most complex conditions and traits and can be used across multiple clinical settings and for population health. The HGSA's view is that further evaluation, including regulatory, implementation and health system evaluation are required before PGS can be routinely implemented in the Australasian healthcare system.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":23446,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Twin Research and Human Genetics\",\"volume\":\"26 1\",\"pages\":\"40-48\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-02-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Twin Research and Human Genetics\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1017/thg.2023.10\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2023/3/23 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"Epub\",\"JCR\":\"Q4\",\"JCRName\":\"GENETICS & HEREDITY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Twin Research and Human Genetics","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1017/thg.2023.10","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2023/3/23 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"GENETICS & HEREDITY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

在与疾病相关的多基因评分(PGS)的价值和使用方面不断取得重大进展。多基因评分的目的是综合多种风险变异的信息并考虑其效应大小,从而得出一个人对某种病症、疾病或性状的遗传易感性。在澳大拉西亚,临床医生和消费者已经可以订购 PGS。然而,关于是否准备将这些信息纳入临床实践和人口健康的争论仍在继续。本立场声明阐述了澳大拉西亚人类遗传学会 (HGSA) 对于疾病相关 PGS 在个体患者和人群健康中的临床应用的观点。声明详细介绍了 PGS 的计算方法,强调了其可能应用的广泛性,并探讨了其当前面临的挑战和局限性。我们考虑了孟德尔遗传学的基本经验及其与 PGS 的持续相关性,同时也承认 PGS 的独特要素。在实践中使用 PGS 时应以证据为基础,尽管相关益处的证据正在迅速涌现,但仍然有限。鉴于临床医生和消费者已经可以订购 PGS,其目前的局限性和关键问题值得考虑。PGS 可用于大多数复杂病症和性状,并可用于多种临床环境和人口健康。HGSA 认为,在澳大利亚医疗系统常规实施 PGS 之前,需要进行进一步评估,包括监管、实施和医疗系统评估。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Human Genetics Society of Australasia Position Statement: Use of Polygenic Scores in Clinical Practice and Population Health.

Considerable progress continues to be made with regards to the value and use of disease associated polygenic scores (PGS). PGS aim to capture a person's genetic liability to a condition, disease, or a trait, combining information across many risk variants and incorporating their effect sizes. They are already available for clinicians and consumers to order in Australasia. However, debate is ongoing over the readiness of this information for integration into clinical practice and population health. This position statement provides the viewpoint of the Human Genetics Society of Australasia (HGSA) regarding the clinical application of disease-associated PGS in both individual patients and population health. The statement details how PGS are calculated, highlights their breadth of possible application, and examines their current challenges and limitations. We consider fundamental lessons from Mendelian genetics and their continuing relevance to PGS, while also acknowledging the distinct elements of PGS. Use of PGS in practice should be evidence based, and the evidence for the associated benefit, while rapidly emerging, remains limited. Given that clinicians and consumers can already order PGS, their current limitations and key issues warrant consideration. PGS can be developed for most complex conditions and traits and can be used across multiple clinical settings and for population health. The HGSA's view is that further evaluation, including regulatory, implementation and health system evaluation are required before PGS can be routinely implemented in the Australasian healthcare system.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Twin Research and Human Genetics
Twin Research and Human Genetics 医学-妇产科学
CiteScore
1.50
自引率
11.10%
发文量
37
审稿时长
6-12 weeks
期刊介绍: Twin Research and Human Genetics is the official journal of the International Society for Twin Studies. Twin Research and Human Genetics covers all areas of human genetics with an emphasis on twin studies, genetic epidemiology, psychiatric and behavioral genetics, and research on multiple births in the fields of epidemiology, genetics, endocrinology, fetal pathology, obstetrics and pediatrics. Through Twin Research and Human Genetics the society aims to publish the latest research developments in twin studies throughout the world.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信