如果我们不这样做呢?MRSA标准预防措施的回顾性回顾。

Q3 Medicine

Wisconsin Medical Journal Pub Date : 2023-05-01

Zachary A Creech, Gia Thinh D Truong, Ann Adler, David Quimby

{"title":"如果我们不这样做呢?MRSA标准预防措施的回顾性回顾。","authors":"Zachary A Creech, Gia Thinh D Truong, Ann Adler, David Quimby","doi":"","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Background: There are conflicting data in the literature about the need for contact isolation for active methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus (MRSA) infections.Methods: In this retrospective review, we compared the MRSA bloodstream standardized infection ratio for 1 year while contact precautions were in place for MRSA infections and for 1 year after routine contact precautions for MRSA were no longer in place.Results: There was no change in the MRSA bloodstream standardized infection ratio between the two time periods.Discussion: With cessation of contact precautions for MRSA infections, there was no change in bloodstream MRSA standardized infection ratios across a large health system. While standardized infection ratios would not detect asymptomatic horizontal transmission of a pathogen, it is reassuring that bloodstream infections - a known complication of MRSA colonization status - did not rise with cessation of contact precautions.","PeriodicalId":38747,"journal":{"name":"Wisconsin Medical Journal","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-05-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"What If We Don't? A Retrospective Review of Standard Precautions for MRSA.\",\"authors\":\"Zachary A Creech, Gia Thinh D Truong, Ann Adler, David Quimby\",\"doi\":\"\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Background: There are conflicting data in the literature about the need for contact isolation for active methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus (MRSA) infections.Methods: In this retrospective review, we compared the MRSA bloodstream standardized infection ratio for 1 year while contact precautions were in place for MRSA infections and for 1 year after routine contact precautions for MRSA were no longer in place.Results: There was no change in the MRSA bloodstream standardized infection ratio between the two time periods.Discussion: With cessation of contact precautions for MRSA infections, there was no change in bloodstream MRSA standardized infection ratios across a large health system. While standardized infection ratios would not detect asymptomatic horizontal transmission of a pathogen, it is reassuring that bloodstream infections - a known complication of MRSA colonization status - did not rise with cessation of contact precautions.\",\"PeriodicalId\":38747,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Wisconsin Medical Journal\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-05-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Wisconsin Medical Journal\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"Medicine\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Wisconsin Medical Journal","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"Medicine","Score":null,"Total":0}

引用次数: 0

摘要

背景:文献中关于是否需要对活性耐甲氧西林金黄色葡萄球菌(MRSA)感染进行接触者隔离的数据存在矛盾。方法:在这项回顾性研究中，我们比较了MRSA接触预防措施实施时1年的MRSA血液标准化感染率和MRSA常规接触预防措施不再实施后1年的MRSA血液标准化感染率。结果:两个时间段MRSA血液标准化感染率无明显变化。讨论:随着MRSA感染接触预防措施的停止，在一个大型卫生系统中，血液MRSA标准化感染率没有变化。虽然标准化的感染率不能检测出病原体的无症状水平传播，但令人放心的是，血液感染(MRSA定植状态的已知并发症)没有随着接触预防措施的停止而上升。

本文章由计算机程序翻译，如有差异，请以英文原文为准。

本刊更多论文

What If We Don't? A Retrospective Review of Standard Precautions for MRSA.

Background: There are conflicting data in the literature about the need for contact isolation for active methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus (MRSA) infections.

Methods: In this retrospective review, we compared the MRSA bloodstream standardized infection ratio for 1 year while contact precautions were in place for MRSA infections and for 1 year after routine contact precautions for MRSA were no longer in place.

Results: There was no change in the MRSA bloodstream standardized infection ratio between the two time periods.

Discussion: With cessation of contact precautions for MRSA infections, there was no change in bloodstream MRSA standardized infection ratios across a large health system. While standardized infection ratios would not detect asymptomatic horizontal transmission of a pathogen, it is reassuring that bloodstream infections - a known complication of MRSA colonization status - did not rise with cessation of contact precautions.

求助全文

通过发布文献求助，成功后即可免费获取论文全文。去求助

来源期刊

Wisconsin Medical Journal Medicine-Medicine (all)

CiteScore

1.30

自引率

0.00%

发文量

期刊介绍： The Wisconsin Medical Society is the largest association of medical doctors in the state with more than 12,000 members dedicated to the best interests of their patients. With that in mind, wisconsinmedicalsociety.org offers patients a unique source for reliable, physician-reviewed medical information. The Wisconsin Medical Society has been a trusted source for health policy leadership since 1841.