临床护理专业后基础护理学生奖学金的障碍与助力。

Q2 Medicine
Jean-Paul Almaze, Waheedha Emmamally, Petra Brysiewicz
{"title":"临床护理专业后基础护理学生奖学金的障碍与助力。","authors":"Jean-Paul Almaze,&nbsp;Waheedha Emmamally,&nbsp;Petra Brysiewicz","doi":"10.4102/curationis.v46i1.2385","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Clinical scholarship is defined as an approach that enables evidence-based nursing and the development of best practices to meet the needs of clients efficiently and effectively. However, there are many barriers that impede its progress.</p><p><strong>Objective: </strong>This study aimed to identify the barriers and enablers to scholarship for post basic nursing students in clinical service areas.</p><p><strong>Method: </strong>This multimethods study used a structured questionnaire followed by semi-structured individual interviews of post basic nursing students and their lecturers (nurse educators).</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The 81 students who completed the questionnaire indicated a lack of support or funding assistance and mentoring, as well as no mechanisms to reward or recognise scholarship as top barriers to clinical scholarship. Top enablers were noticed as reward mechanisms in place, more protected time and availability of role models and mentoring. Twelve respondents engaged in the qualitative phase and three categories emerged from the data, namely (1) resource dependent, (2) 'what's the use of research', (3) making a change.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>It has been shown that there is a need to adopt and promote a culture of clinical scholarship to ensure that the best available evidence is being utilised by nurses to effectively manage their patients; however, to support clinical scholarship, resources are needed.Contribution: This study highlighted the lack of funding and resources as being a major barrier to scholarship, together with an institutional culture that did not promote clinical scholarship. Providing protected time, mentoring and criteria for promotion and reward based on scholarship is viewed as enabling.</p>","PeriodicalId":35715,"journal":{"name":"Curationis","volume":"46 1","pages":"e1-e7"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-06-22","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10319938/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Barriers and enablers to scholarship for post basic nursing students in clinical service.\",\"authors\":\"Jean-Paul Almaze,&nbsp;Waheedha Emmamally,&nbsp;Petra Brysiewicz\",\"doi\":\"10.4102/curationis.v46i1.2385\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Clinical scholarship is defined as an approach that enables evidence-based nursing and the development of best practices to meet the needs of clients efficiently and effectively. However, there are many barriers that impede its progress.</p><p><strong>Objective: </strong>This study aimed to identify the barriers and enablers to scholarship for post basic nursing students in clinical service areas.</p><p><strong>Method: </strong>This multimethods study used a structured questionnaire followed by semi-structured individual interviews of post basic nursing students and their lecturers (nurse educators).</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The 81 students who completed the questionnaire indicated a lack of support or funding assistance and mentoring, as well as no mechanisms to reward or recognise scholarship as top barriers to clinical scholarship. Top enablers were noticed as reward mechanisms in place, more protected time and availability of role models and mentoring. Twelve respondents engaged in the qualitative phase and three categories emerged from the data, namely (1) resource dependent, (2) 'what's the use of research', (3) making a change.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>It has been shown that there is a need to adopt and promote a culture of clinical scholarship to ensure that the best available evidence is being utilised by nurses to effectively manage their patients; however, to support clinical scholarship, resources are needed.Contribution: This study highlighted the lack of funding and resources as being a major barrier to scholarship, together with an institutional culture that did not promote clinical scholarship. Providing protected time, mentoring and criteria for promotion and reward based on scholarship is viewed as enabling.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":35715,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Curationis\",\"volume\":\"46 1\",\"pages\":\"e1-e7\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-06-22\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10319938/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Curationis\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.4102/curationis.v46i1.2385\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"Medicine\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Curationis","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.4102/curationis.v46i1.2385","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"Medicine","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

背景:临床学术被定义为一种使循证护理和最佳实践的发展能够有效地满足客户需求的方法。然而,有许多障碍阻碍了它的发展。目的:本研究旨在找出临床服务领域后基础护理专业学生获得奖学金的障碍和促进因素。方法:本研究采用结构化问卷和半结构化的个人访谈对基础护理专业学生及其讲师(护理教育者)进行调查。结果:完成问卷调查的81名学生表示缺乏支持或资金援助和指导,以及没有奖励或认可奖学金的机制是临床奖学金的最大障碍。人们注意到,最重要的促成因素是奖励机制,更多的保护时间和角色榜样和指导的可用性。12名受访者参与了定性阶段,从数据中出现了三个类别,即(1)资源依赖,(2)研究有什么用?(3)做出改变。结论:研究表明,有必要采用和促进临床学术文化,以确保护士有效地利用现有的最佳证据来管理患者;然而,为了支持临床奖学金,需要资源。贡献:本研究强调了缺乏资金和资源是学术研究的主要障碍,以及不促进临床学术研究的制度文化。提供受保护的时间、指导以及基于奖学金的晋升和奖励标准,被认为是一种授权。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Barriers and enablers to scholarship for post basic nursing students in clinical service.

Background: Clinical scholarship is defined as an approach that enables evidence-based nursing and the development of best practices to meet the needs of clients efficiently and effectively. However, there are many barriers that impede its progress.

Objective: This study aimed to identify the barriers and enablers to scholarship for post basic nursing students in clinical service areas.

Method: This multimethods study used a structured questionnaire followed by semi-structured individual interviews of post basic nursing students and their lecturers (nurse educators).

Results: The 81 students who completed the questionnaire indicated a lack of support or funding assistance and mentoring, as well as no mechanisms to reward or recognise scholarship as top barriers to clinical scholarship. Top enablers were noticed as reward mechanisms in place, more protected time and availability of role models and mentoring. Twelve respondents engaged in the qualitative phase and three categories emerged from the data, namely (1) resource dependent, (2) 'what's the use of research', (3) making a change.

Conclusion: It has been shown that there is a need to adopt and promote a culture of clinical scholarship to ensure that the best available evidence is being utilised by nurses to effectively manage their patients; however, to support clinical scholarship, resources are needed.Contribution: This study highlighted the lack of funding and resources as being a major barrier to scholarship, together with an institutional culture that did not promote clinical scholarship. Providing protected time, mentoring and criteria for promotion and reward based on scholarship is viewed as enabling.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Curationis
Curationis Medicine-Medicine (all)
CiteScore
1.50
自引率
0.00%
发文量
22
审稿时长
19 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信