因果政策分析的计量经济学模型。

IF 6.8 2区经济学 Q1 ECONOMICS

Annual Review of Economics Pub Date : 2022-01-01 DOI:10.1146/annurev-economics-051520-015456

James Heckman, Rodrigo Pinto

{"title":"因果政策分析的计量经济学模型。","authors":"James Heckman, Rodrigo Pinto","doi":"10.1146/annurev-economics-051520-015456","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"This paper discusses the econometric model of causal policy analysis and two alternative frameworks that are popular in statistics and computer science. By employing the alternative frameworks uncritically, economists ignore the substantial advantages of an econometric approach, resulting in less informative analyses of economic policy. We show that the econometric approach to causality enables economists to characterize and analyze a wider range of policy problems than alternative approaches.","PeriodicalId":47891,"journal":{"name":"Annual Review of Economics","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":6.8000,"publicationDate":"2022-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9894266/pdf/nihms-1856437.pdf","citationCount":"8","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"The Econometric Model for Causal Policy Analysis.\",\"authors\":\"James Heckman, Rodrigo Pinto\",\"doi\":\"10.1146/annurev-economics-051520-015456\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"This paper discusses the econometric model of causal policy analysis and two alternative frameworks that are popular in statistics and computer science. By employing the alternative frameworks uncritically, economists ignore the substantial advantages of an econometric approach, resulting in less informative analyses of economic policy. We show that the econometric approach to causality enables economists to characterize and analyze a wider range of policy problems than alternative approaches.\",\"PeriodicalId\":47891,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Annual Review of Economics\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":6.8000,\"publicationDate\":\"2022-01-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9894266/pdf/nihms-1856437.pdf\",\"citationCount\":\"8\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Annual Review of Economics\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"96\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev-economics-051520-015456\",\"RegionNum\":2,\"RegionCategory\":\"经济学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"ECONOMICS\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Annual Review of Economics","FirstCategoryId":"96","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev-economics-051520-015456","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"经济学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"ECONOMICS","Score":null,"Total":0}

引用次数: 8

摘要

本文讨论了因果政策分析的计量经济学模型以及在统计学和计算机科学中流行的两种替代框架。通过不加批判地使用替代框架，经济学家忽略了计量经济学方法的实质性优势，导致对经济政策的信息分析较少。我们表明，因果关系的计量经济学方法使经济学家能够比其他方法更广泛地描述和分析政策问题。

本文章由计算机程序翻译，如有差异，请以英文原文为准。

查看原文本刊更多论文

The Econometric Model for Causal Policy Analysis.

This paper discusses the econometric model of causal policy analysis and two alternative frameworks that are popular in statistics and computer science. By employing the alternative frameworks uncritically, economists ignore the substantial advantages of an econometric approach, resulting in less informative analyses of economic policy. We show that the econometric approach to causality enables economists to characterize and analyze a wider range of policy problems than alternative approaches.

求助全文

通过发布文献求助，成功后即可免费获取论文全文。去求助

来源期刊

Annual Review of Economics ECONOMICS-

CiteScore

9.70

自引率

3.60%

发文量

期刊介绍： The Annual Review of Economics covers significant developments in the field of economics, including macroeconomics and money; microeconomics, including economic psychology; international economics; public finance; health economics; education; economic growth and technological change; economic development; social economics, including culture, institutions, social interaction, and networks; game theory, political economy, and social choice; and more.