健康信息交换:了解数据互操作性的政策环境和未来。

Yearbook of medical informatics Pub Date : 2023-08-01 Epub Date: 2023-07-06 DOI:10.1055/s-0043-1768719
A Jay Holmgren, Moritz Esdar, Jens Hüsers, João Coutinho-Almeida
{"title":"健康信息交换:了解数据互操作性的政策环境和未来。","authors":"A Jay Holmgren, Moritz Esdar, Jens Hüsers, João Coutinho-Almeida","doi":"10.1055/s-0043-1768719","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objectives: </strong>To review recent literature on health information exchange (HIE), focusing on the policy approach of five case study nations: the United States of America, the United Kingdom, Germany, Israel, and Portugal, as well as synthesize lessons learned across countries and provide recommendations for future research.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A narrative review of each nation's HIE policy frameworks, current state, and future HIE strategy.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Key themes that emerged include the importance of both central decision-making as well as local innovation, the multiple and complex challenges of broad HIE adoption, and the varying role of HIE across different national health system structures.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>HIE is an increasingly important capability and policy priority as electronic health record (EHR) adoption becomes more common and care delivery is increasingly digitized. While all five case study nations have adopted some level of HIE, there are significant differences across their level of data sharing infrastructure and maturity, and each nation took a different policy approach. While identifying generalizable strategies across disparate international systems is challenging, there are several common themes across successful HIE policy frameworks, such as the importance of central government prioritization of data sharing. Finally, we make several recommendations for future research to expand the breadth and depth of the literature on HIE and guide future decision-making by policymakers and practitioners.</p>","PeriodicalId":40027,"journal":{"name":"Yearbook of medical informatics","volume":" ","pages":"184-194"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-08-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10751121/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Health Information Exchange: Understanding the Policy Landscape and Future of Data Interoperability.\",\"authors\":\"A Jay Holmgren, Moritz Esdar, Jens Hüsers, João Coutinho-Almeida\",\"doi\":\"10.1055/s-0043-1768719\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Objectives: </strong>To review recent literature on health information exchange (HIE), focusing on the policy approach of five case study nations: the United States of America, the United Kingdom, Germany, Israel, and Portugal, as well as synthesize lessons learned across countries and provide recommendations for future research.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A narrative review of each nation's HIE policy frameworks, current state, and future HIE strategy.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Key themes that emerged include the importance of both central decision-making as well as local innovation, the multiple and complex challenges of broad HIE adoption, and the varying role of HIE across different national health system structures.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>HIE is an increasingly important capability and policy priority as electronic health record (EHR) adoption becomes more common and care delivery is increasingly digitized. While all five case study nations have adopted some level of HIE, there are significant differences across their level of data sharing infrastructure and maturity, and each nation took a different policy approach. While identifying generalizable strategies across disparate international systems is challenging, there are several common themes across successful HIE policy frameworks, such as the importance of central government prioritization of data sharing. Finally, we make several recommendations for future research to expand the breadth and depth of the literature on HIE and guide future decision-making by policymakers and practitioners.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":40027,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Yearbook of medical informatics\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"184-194\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-08-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10751121/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Yearbook of medical informatics\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1055/s-0043-1768719\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2023/7/6 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"Epub\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Yearbook of medical informatics","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1055/s-0043-1768719","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2023/7/6 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

目标:回顾近期有关健康信息交换(HIE)的文献,重点关注五个案例研究国家(美国、英国、德国、以色列和葡萄牙)的政策方法,总结各国的经验教训,并为未来研究提供建议:方法:对每个国家的 HIE 政策框架、现状和未来 HIE 战略进行叙述性回顾:出现的关键主题包括中央决策和地方创新的重要性、广泛采用 HIE 所面临的多重复杂挑战以及 HIE 在不同国家卫生系统结构中的不同作用:结论:随着电子病历(EHR)的普及和医疗服务的日益数字化,HIE 成为一项日益重要的能力和政策重点。虽然所有五个案例研究国家都采用了某种程度的 HIE,但它们的数据共享基础设施水平和成熟度存在显著差异,而且每个国家都采取了不同的政策方法。虽然在不同的国际体系中确定可推广的战略具有挑战性,但成功的 HIE 政策框架有几个共同的主题,例如中央政府优先考虑数据共享的重要性。最后,我们对未来的研究提出了若干建议,以拓展 HIE 文献的广度和深度,并为决策者和从业人员未来的决策提供指导。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Health Information Exchange: Understanding the Policy Landscape and Future of Data Interoperability.

Objectives: To review recent literature on health information exchange (HIE), focusing on the policy approach of five case study nations: the United States of America, the United Kingdom, Germany, Israel, and Portugal, as well as synthesize lessons learned across countries and provide recommendations for future research.

Methods: A narrative review of each nation's HIE policy frameworks, current state, and future HIE strategy.

Results: Key themes that emerged include the importance of both central decision-making as well as local innovation, the multiple and complex challenges of broad HIE adoption, and the varying role of HIE across different national health system structures.

Conclusion: HIE is an increasingly important capability and policy priority as electronic health record (EHR) adoption becomes more common and care delivery is increasingly digitized. While all five case study nations have adopted some level of HIE, there are significant differences across their level of data sharing infrastructure and maturity, and each nation took a different policy approach. While identifying generalizable strategies across disparate international systems is challenging, there are several common themes across successful HIE policy frameworks, such as the importance of central government prioritization of data sharing. Finally, we make several recommendations for future research to expand the breadth and depth of the literature on HIE and guide future decision-making by policymakers and practitioners.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Yearbook of medical informatics
Yearbook of medical informatics Medicine-Medicine (all)
CiteScore
4.10
自引率
0.00%
发文量
20
期刊介绍: Published by the International Medical Informatics Association, this annual publication includes the best papers in medical informatics from around the world.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信