从移情到系统变革:贝托尔特-布莱希特的四首健康诗。

IF 1.2 0 HUMANITIES, MULTIDISCIPLINARY
Journal of Medical Humanities Pub Date : 2024-03-01 Epub Date: 2023-06-21 DOI:10.1007/s10912-023-09801-5
William MacGregor, Martin Horn, Dennis Raphael
{"title":"从移情到系统变革:贝托尔特-布莱希特的四首健康诗。","authors":"William MacGregor, Martin Horn, Dennis Raphael","doi":"10.1007/s10912-023-09801-5","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Bertolt Brecht's poem \"A Worker's Speech to a Doctor\" is frequently cited as a means to raise awareness among health workers of the health effects of living and working conditions. Less cited is his Call to Arms trilogy of poems, which calls for class-based action to transform the capitalist economic system that sickens and kills so many. In this article, we show how \"A Worker's Speech to a Doctor,\" with its plea for empathy for the ill, contrasts with the more activist and often militant tone of the Call to Arms trilogy: \"Call to a Sick Communist,\" \"The Sick Communist's Answer to the Comrades,\" and \"Call to the Doctors and Nurses.\" We also show that, while \"A Worker's Speech to a Doctor\" has been applied in the training of health workers, its accusatorial tone towards health workers' complicity in the system the poem is critiquing risks alienating such workers. In contrast, the Call to Arms trilogy seeks common ground, inviting these same workers into the broader political and social fight against injustice. While we contend that the description of the sick worker as a \"Communist\" risks estranging these health workers, our analysis of the Call to Arms poems nevertheless indicates that their use can contribute to moving health workers' educational discourse beyond a laudable but fleeting elicitation of empathy for the ill towards a structural critique and deeper systemic understanding in order to prompt action by health workers to reform or even replace the capitalist economic system that sickens and kills so many.</p>","PeriodicalId":45518,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Medical Humanities","volume":" ","pages":"53-77"},"PeriodicalIF":1.2000,"publicationDate":"2024-03-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Beyond Empathy to System Change: Four Poems on Health by Bertolt Brecht.\",\"authors\":\"William MacGregor, Martin Horn, Dennis Raphael\",\"doi\":\"10.1007/s10912-023-09801-5\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p>Bertolt Brecht's poem \\\"A Worker's Speech to a Doctor\\\" is frequently cited as a means to raise awareness among health workers of the health effects of living and working conditions. Less cited is his Call to Arms trilogy of poems, which calls for class-based action to transform the capitalist economic system that sickens and kills so many. In this article, we show how \\\"A Worker's Speech to a Doctor,\\\" with its plea for empathy for the ill, contrasts with the more activist and often militant tone of the Call to Arms trilogy: \\\"Call to a Sick Communist,\\\" \\\"The Sick Communist's Answer to the Comrades,\\\" and \\\"Call to the Doctors and Nurses.\\\" We also show that, while \\\"A Worker's Speech to a Doctor\\\" has been applied in the training of health workers, its accusatorial tone towards health workers' complicity in the system the poem is critiquing risks alienating such workers. In contrast, the Call to Arms trilogy seeks common ground, inviting these same workers into the broader political and social fight against injustice. While we contend that the description of the sick worker as a \\\"Communist\\\" risks estranging these health workers, our analysis of the Call to Arms poems nevertheless indicates that their use can contribute to moving health workers' educational discourse beyond a laudable but fleeting elicitation of empathy for the ill towards a structural critique and deeper systemic understanding in order to prompt action by health workers to reform or even replace the capitalist economic system that sickens and kills so many.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":45518,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of Medical Humanities\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"53-77\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.2000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-03-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of Medical Humanities\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1007/s10912-023-09801-5\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2023/6/21 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"Epub\",\"JCR\":\"0\",\"JCRName\":\"HUMANITIES, MULTIDISCIPLINARY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Medical Humanities","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s10912-023-09801-5","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2023/6/21 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"0","JCRName":"HUMANITIES, MULTIDISCIPLINARY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

贝托尔特-布莱希特的诗歌《一个工人对医生的演讲》经常被引用来提高医务工作者对生活和工作条件对健康影响的认识。较少被引用的是他的《武装号召》诗歌三部曲,其中呼吁采取阶级行动,改变使许多人生病和死亡的资本主义经济制度。在这篇文章中,我们将展示《一个工人对医生的演讲》呼吁同情病人,这与《武装号召》三部曲中更为激进、往往是好战的基调形成了鲜明对比:"呼唤生病的共产党员"、"生病的共产党员给同志们的答复 "和 "呼唤医生和护士"。我们还发现,虽然《一个工人对医生的演讲》已被应用于卫生工作者的培训,但其对卫生工作者与诗歌所批判的制度同流合污的指责语气有可能疏远这些工作者。与此相反,"武装的呼唤 "三部曲寻求共同点,邀请这些医务工作者参与到更广泛的政治和社会斗争中,反对不公正。我们认为,将生病的工人描述为 "共产主义者 "可能会疏远这些医务工作者,但我们对《武器的召唤》诗歌的分析表明,这些诗歌的使用有助于医务工作者的教育话语超越值得称赞但稍纵即逝的对病人的同情,转向结构性批判和更深入的系统性理解,从而促使医务工作者采取行动,改革甚至取代使如此多的人生病和死亡的资本主义经济制度。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Beyond Empathy to System Change: Four Poems on Health by Bertolt Brecht.

Bertolt Brecht's poem "A Worker's Speech to a Doctor" is frequently cited as a means to raise awareness among health workers of the health effects of living and working conditions. Less cited is his Call to Arms trilogy of poems, which calls for class-based action to transform the capitalist economic system that sickens and kills so many. In this article, we show how "A Worker's Speech to a Doctor," with its plea for empathy for the ill, contrasts with the more activist and often militant tone of the Call to Arms trilogy: "Call to a Sick Communist," "The Sick Communist's Answer to the Comrades," and "Call to the Doctors and Nurses." We also show that, while "A Worker's Speech to a Doctor" has been applied in the training of health workers, its accusatorial tone towards health workers' complicity in the system the poem is critiquing risks alienating such workers. In contrast, the Call to Arms trilogy seeks common ground, inviting these same workers into the broader political and social fight against injustice. While we contend that the description of the sick worker as a "Communist" risks estranging these health workers, our analysis of the Call to Arms poems nevertheless indicates that their use can contribute to moving health workers' educational discourse beyond a laudable but fleeting elicitation of empathy for the ill towards a structural critique and deeper systemic understanding in order to prompt action by health workers to reform or even replace the capitalist economic system that sickens and kills so many.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Journal of Medical Humanities
Journal of Medical Humanities HUMANITIES, MULTIDISCIPLINARY-
CiteScore
1.90
自引率
11.10%
发文量
33
期刊介绍: Journal of Medical Humanities publishes original papers that reflect its enlarged focus on interdisciplinary inquiry in medicine and medical education. Such inquiry can emerge in the following ways: (1) from the medical humanities, which includes literature, history, philosophy, and bioethics as well as those areas of the social and behavioral sciences that have strong humanistic traditions; (2) from cultural studies, a multidisciplinary activity involving the humanities; women''s, African-American, and other critical studies; media studies and popular culture; and sociology and anthropology, which can be used to examine medical institutions, practice and education with a special focus on relations of power; and (3) from pedagogical perspectives that elucidate what and how knowledge is made and valued in medicine, how that knowledge is expressed and transmitted, and the ideological basis of medical education.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信