用不同根管螯合剂处理后人根性牙本质的弯曲强度和显微硬度。

Q2 Dentistry
Journal of Conservative Dentistry Pub Date : 2023-05-01 Epub Date: 2023-05-16 DOI:10.4103/jcd.jcd_173_23
Ahmed El-Banna, Maii Y Elmesellawy, Mohamed Ahmed Elsayed
{"title":"用不同根管螯合剂处理后人根性牙本质的弯曲强度和显微硬度。","authors":"Ahmed El-Banna,&nbsp;Maii Y Elmesellawy,&nbsp;Mohamed Ahmed Elsayed","doi":"10.4103/jcd.jcd_173_23","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>The objective of this <i>in vitro</i> study was to examine the impact of different endodontic chelating agents on the flexural strength and microhardness of root dentin.</p><p><strong>Materials and methods: </strong>Fourty dentin sticks of (1 mm × 1 mm × 12 mm) were obtained from 10 single-rooted premolars and divided into four groups (<i>n</i> = 10). One stick from each tooth was assigned to one of the experimental groups and was soaked in one of the experimental chelating solutions for 5 min 17% ethylenediaminetetraacetic acid (EDTA), 2.5% phytic acid (PA), 18% etidronic acid, or saline (control group). Following the 5-min soak, the sticks' flexural strength was evaluated using a 3-point loading test using the universal testing machine, and the surface microhardness was tested using a Vickers's microhardness tester.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>PA (2.5%) and etidronic acid (18%) showed no significant detrimental effect on either the flexural strength or the surface microhardness of radicular dentin compared to the control. EDTA (17%) exhibited a significant drop in the flexural strength and microhardness of radicular dentin compared to the other groups.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>PA and etidronic acid chelators do not compromise the surface and bulk mechanical properties of radicular dentin.</p>","PeriodicalId":38892,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Conservative Dentistry","volume":"26 3","pages":"344-348"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-05-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10309119/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Flexural strength and microhardness of human radicular dentin sticks after conditioning with different endodontic chelating agents.\",\"authors\":\"Ahmed El-Banna,&nbsp;Maii Y Elmesellawy,&nbsp;Mohamed Ahmed Elsayed\",\"doi\":\"10.4103/jcd.jcd_173_23\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>The objective of this <i>in vitro</i> study was to examine the impact of different endodontic chelating agents on the flexural strength and microhardness of root dentin.</p><p><strong>Materials and methods: </strong>Fourty dentin sticks of (1 mm × 1 mm × 12 mm) were obtained from 10 single-rooted premolars and divided into four groups (<i>n</i> = 10). One stick from each tooth was assigned to one of the experimental groups and was soaked in one of the experimental chelating solutions for 5 min 17% ethylenediaminetetraacetic acid (EDTA), 2.5% phytic acid (PA), 18% etidronic acid, or saline (control group). Following the 5-min soak, the sticks' flexural strength was evaluated using a 3-point loading test using the universal testing machine, and the surface microhardness was tested using a Vickers's microhardness tester.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>PA (2.5%) and etidronic acid (18%) showed no significant detrimental effect on either the flexural strength or the surface microhardness of radicular dentin compared to the control. EDTA (17%) exhibited a significant drop in the flexural strength and microhardness of radicular dentin compared to the other groups.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>PA and etidronic acid chelators do not compromise the surface and bulk mechanical properties of radicular dentin.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":38892,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of Conservative Dentistry\",\"volume\":\"26 3\",\"pages\":\"344-348\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-05-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10309119/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of Conservative Dentistry\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.4103/jcd.jcd_173_23\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2023/5/16 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"Epub\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"Dentistry\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Conservative Dentistry","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.4103/jcd.jcd_173_23","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2023/5/16 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"Dentistry","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

引言:本体外研究的目的是考察不同根管螯合剂对根牙本质弯曲强度和显微硬度的影响。材料和方法:从10颗单根前磨牙中取出4根(1mm×1mm×12mm)的牙本质棒,分为4组(n=10)。将每颗牙齿的一根棍子分配给一个实验组,并在一种实验螯合溶液中浸泡5分钟,即17%乙二胺四乙酸(EDTA)、2.5%植酸(PA)、18%乙膦酸或盐水(对照组)。浸泡5分钟后,使用万能试验机进行三点加载试验,评估棒的弯曲强度,并使用维氏显微硬度计测试表面显微硬度。结果:与对照组相比,PA(2.5%)和依替膦酸(18%)对根性牙本质的弯曲强度或表面显微硬度均无显著影响。EDTA(17%)与其他组相比,根性牙本质的弯曲强度和显微硬度显著下降。结论:PA和依替膦酸螯合剂不影响根性牙本质的表面和整体力学性能。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。

Flexural strength and microhardness of human radicular dentin sticks after conditioning with different endodontic chelating agents.

Flexural strength and microhardness of human radicular dentin sticks after conditioning with different endodontic chelating agents.

Flexural strength and microhardness of human radicular dentin sticks after conditioning with different endodontic chelating agents.

Introduction: The objective of this in vitro study was to examine the impact of different endodontic chelating agents on the flexural strength and microhardness of root dentin.

Materials and methods: Fourty dentin sticks of (1 mm × 1 mm × 12 mm) were obtained from 10 single-rooted premolars and divided into four groups (n = 10). One stick from each tooth was assigned to one of the experimental groups and was soaked in one of the experimental chelating solutions for 5 min 17% ethylenediaminetetraacetic acid (EDTA), 2.5% phytic acid (PA), 18% etidronic acid, or saline (control group). Following the 5-min soak, the sticks' flexural strength was evaluated using a 3-point loading test using the universal testing machine, and the surface microhardness was tested using a Vickers's microhardness tester.

Results: PA (2.5%) and etidronic acid (18%) showed no significant detrimental effect on either the flexural strength or the surface microhardness of radicular dentin compared to the control. EDTA (17%) exhibited a significant drop in the flexural strength and microhardness of radicular dentin compared to the other groups.

Conclusions: PA and etidronic acid chelators do not compromise the surface and bulk mechanical properties of radicular dentin.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Journal of Conservative Dentistry
Journal of Conservative Dentistry Dentistry-Dentistry (all)
CiteScore
2.10
自引率
0.00%
发文量
114
期刊介绍: The Journal of Conservative Dentistry (ISSN - 0972-0707) is the official journal of the Indian Association of Conservative Dentistry and Endodontics (IACDE). Our journal publishes scientific articles, case reports, short communications, invited reviews and comparative studies evaluating materials and methods in the fields of Conservative Dentistry, Dental Materials and Endodontics. J Conserv Dent has a diverse readership that includes full-time clinicians, full-time academicians, residents, students and scientists. Effective communication with this diverse readership requires careful attention to writing style.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信