评估职业暴露于空气中纳米颗粒的策略:系统回顾和建议

IF 3.5 3区 医学 Q1 PUBLIC, ENVIRONMENTAL & OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH
Louis Galey , Sabyne Audignon , Patrick Brochard , Maximilien Debia , Aude Lacourt , Pierre Lambert , Olivier Le Bihan , Laurent Martinon , Sébastien Bau , Olivier Witschger , Alain Garrigou
{"title":"评估职业暴露于空气中纳米颗粒的策略:系统回顾和建议","authors":"Louis Galey ,&nbsp;Sabyne Audignon ,&nbsp;Patrick Brochard ,&nbsp;Maximilien Debia ,&nbsp;Aude Lacourt ,&nbsp;Pierre Lambert ,&nbsp;Olivier Le Bihan ,&nbsp;Laurent Martinon ,&nbsp;Sébastien Bau ,&nbsp;Olivier Witschger ,&nbsp;Alain Garrigou","doi":"10.1016/j.shaw.2023.02.002","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>In many industrial sectors, workers are exposed to manufactured or unintentionally emitted airborne nanoparticles (NPs). To develop prevention and enhance knowledge surrounding exposure, it has become crucial to achieve a consensus on how to assess exposure to airborne NPs by inhalation in the workplace. Here, we review the literature presenting recommendations on assessing occupational exposure to NPs. The 23 distinct strategies retained were analyzed in terms of the following points: target NPs, objectives, steps, “measurement strategy” (instruments, physicochemical analysis, and data processing), “contextual information” presented, and “work activity” analysis. The robustness (consistency of information) and practical aspects (detailed methodology) of each strategy were estimated. The objectives and methodological steps varied, as did the measurement techniques. Strategies were essentially based on NPs measurement, but improvements could be made to better account for “contextual information” and “work activity”. Based on this review, recommendations for an operational strategy were formulated, integrating the work activity with the measurement to provide a more complete assessment of situations leading to airborne NP exposure. These recommendations can be used with the objective of producing homogeneous exposure data for epidemiological purposes and to help improve prevention strategies.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":56149,"journal":{"name":"Safety and Health at Work","volume":"14 2","pages":"Pages 163-173"},"PeriodicalIF":3.5000,"publicationDate":"2023-06-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10300466/pdf/","citationCount":"1","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Strategies to Assess Occupational Exposure to Airborne Nanoparticles: Systematic Review and Recommendations\",\"authors\":\"Louis Galey ,&nbsp;Sabyne Audignon ,&nbsp;Patrick Brochard ,&nbsp;Maximilien Debia ,&nbsp;Aude Lacourt ,&nbsp;Pierre Lambert ,&nbsp;Olivier Le Bihan ,&nbsp;Laurent Martinon ,&nbsp;Sébastien Bau ,&nbsp;Olivier Witschger ,&nbsp;Alain Garrigou\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.shaw.2023.02.002\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><p>In many industrial sectors, workers are exposed to manufactured or unintentionally emitted airborne nanoparticles (NPs). To develop prevention and enhance knowledge surrounding exposure, it has become crucial to achieve a consensus on how to assess exposure to airborne NPs by inhalation in the workplace. Here, we review the literature presenting recommendations on assessing occupational exposure to NPs. The 23 distinct strategies retained were analyzed in terms of the following points: target NPs, objectives, steps, “measurement strategy” (instruments, physicochemical analysis, and data processing), “contextual information” presented, and “work activity” analysis. The robustness (consistency of information) and practical aspects (detailed methodology) of each strategy were estimated. The objectives and methodological steps varied, as did the measurement techniques. Strategies were essentially based on NPs measurement, but improvements could be made to better account for “contextual information” and “work activity”. Based on this review, recommendations for an operational strategy were formulated, integrating the work activity with the measurement to provide a more complete assessment of situations leading to airborne NP exposure. These recommendations can be used with the objective of producing homogeneous exposure data for epidemiological purposes and to help improve prevention strategies.</p></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":56149,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Safety and Health at Work\",\"volume\":\"14 2\",\"pages\":\"Pages 163-173\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":3.5000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-06-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10300466/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"1\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Safety and Health at Work\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2093791123000070\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"PUBLIC, ENVIRONMENTAL & OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Safety and Health at Work","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2093791123000070","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"PUBLIC, ENVIRONMENTAL & OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

摘要

在许多工业部门,工人暴露于制造或无意中排放的空气中纳米颗粒(NPs)。为了开展预防工作并加强有关接触的知识,就如何评估工作场所吸入空气传播的NPs接触达成共识已变得至关重要。在此,我们回顾了文献,提出了评估NPs职业暴露的建议。根据以下几点分析了保留的23种不同策略:目标NPs、目标、步骤、“度量策略”(工具、物理化学分析和数据处理)、“上下文信息”和“工作活动”分析。评估了每种策略的鲁棒性(信息一致性)和实用性(详细的方法)。目标和方法步骤各不相同,测量技术也各不相同。战略基本上是根据国家效益的衡量,但可以作出改进,以便更好地考虑到“背景信息”和“工作活动”。在此审查的基础上,制定了操作策略建议,将工作活动与测量相结合,以提供更完整的评估导致空气中NP暴露的情况。这些建议可用于为流行病学目的编制均匀的接触数据,并有助于改进预防战略。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。

Strategies to Assess Occupational Exposure to Airborne Nanoparticles: Systematic Review and Recommendations

Strategies to Assess Occupational Exposure to Airborne Nanoparticles: Systematic Review and Recommendations

Strategies to Assess Occupational Exposure to Airborne Nanoparticles: Systematic Review and Recommendations

Strategies to Assess Occupational Exposure to Airborne Nanoparticles: Systematic Review and Recommendations

In many industrial sectors, workers are exposed to manufactured or unintentionally emitted airborne nanoparticles (NPs). To develop prevention and enhance knowledge surrounding exposure, it has become crucial to achieve a consensus on how to assess exposure to airborne NPs by inhalation in the workplace. Here, we review the literature presenting recommendations on assessing occupational exposure to NPs. The 23 distinct strategies retained were analyzed in terms of the following points: target NPs, objectives, steps, “measurement strategy” (instruments, physicochemical analysis, and data processing), “contextual information” presented, and “work activity” analysis. The robustness (consistency of information) and practical aspects (detailed methodology) of each strategy were estimated. The objectives and methodological steps varied, as did the measurement techniques. Strategies were essentially based on NPs measurement, but improvements could be made to better account for “contextual information” and “work activity”. Based on this review, recommendations for an operational strategy were formulated, integrating the work activity with the measurement to provide a more complete assessment of situations leading to airborne NP exposure. These recommendations can be used with the objective of producing homogeneous exposure data for epidemiological purposes and to help improve prevention strategies.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Safety and Health at Work
Safety and Health at Work Social Sciences-Safety Research
CiteScore
6.40
自引率
5.70%
发文量
1080
审稿时长
38 days
期刊介绍: Safety and Health at Work (SH@W) is an international, peer-reviewed, interdisciplinary journal published quarterly in English beginning in 2010. The journal is aimed at providing grounds for the exchange of ideas and data developed through research experience in the broad field of occupational health and safety. Articles may deal with scientific research to improve workers'' health and safety by eliminating occupational accidents and diseases, pursuing a better working life, and creating a safe and comfortable working environment. The journal focuses primarily on original articles across the whole scope of occupational health and safety, but also welcomes up-to-date review papers and short communications and commentaries on urgent issues and case studies on unique epidemiological survey, methods of accident investigation, and analysis. High priority will be given to articles on occupational epidemiology, medicine, hygiene, toxicology, nursing and health services, work safety, ergonomics, work organization, engineering of safety (mechanical, electrical, chemical, and construction), safety management and policy, and studies related to economic evaluation and its social policy and organizational aspects. Its abbreviated title is Saf Health Work.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信