平台切换修复对宽直径外六角牙种植体患者骨吸收的影响:一项10年随访研究

IF 1.7 4区 医学 Q3 DENTISTRY, ORAL SURGERY & MEDICINE
Paolo Vigolo, Sabrina Mutinelli, Edoardo Stellini, Adolfo Di Fiore
{"title":"平台切换修复对宽直径外六角牙种植体患者骨吸收的影响:一项10年随访研究","authors":"Paolo Vigolo,&nbsp;Sabrina Mutinelli,&nbsp;Edoardo Stellini,&nbsp;Adolfo Di Fiore","doi":"10.11607/jomi.9744","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p><b>Purpose:</b> To investigate and assess the differences in crestal bone loss (CBL) between wide-diameter, external-hexagon-connection implants restored with platform-switching (PS) and platform-matching (PM) restorations with a follow-up of 10 years. <b>Materials and Methods:</b> This study retrospectively analyzed the updated and enlarged dataset of a 5-year prospective clinical study at 10-year follow-up. The data concerns 182 healthy adult subjects treated in a private dental practice who received a single wide-diameter implant with an external hexagon connection in the molar area, restored with either a PS restoration (test) or PM restoration (control). The amount of CBL was radiographically measured at each annual follow-up, as well as after 5 and 10 years of implant loading. In evaluating the association between the two types of abutments and bone loss (including change over time), a linear mixed effects model was run for longitudinal data. <b>Results:</b> Implants connected with PS restorations exhibited significantly lower reduction (0.25 mm) in CBL than those joined to PM restorations (<i>P</i> < .001; 95% CI from 0.22 to 0.29). However, both groups presented a higher increase in bone loss during the first year (0.58 mm in PS and 0.83 mm in PM) and a linear increment thereafter until the 10-year follow-up (0.046 mm/year; <i>P</i> < .001; 95% CI from .042 to .049). <b>Conclusion:</b> Notwithstanding the limitations of this study, it can be concluded that after 10 years of follow-up, the implant with a wide diameter and external-hexagon connection restored with a PS abutment seems to be more effective in reducing bone loss compared with the PM abutment.</p>","PeriodicalId":50298,"journal":{"name":"International Journal of Oral & Maxillofacial Implants","volume":"38 1","pages":"46-52"},"PeriodicalIF":1.7000,"publicationDate":"2023-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Influence of Platform-Switched Restoration on Bone Resorption in Patients Treated with Wide-Diameter, External-Hex-Connection Dental Implants: A 10-Year Follow-up Study.\",\"authors\":\"Paolo Vigolo,&nbsp;Sabrina Mutinelli,&nbsp;Edoardo Stellini,&nbsp;Adolfo Di Fiore\",\"doi\":\"10.11607/jomi.9744\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p><b>Purpose:</b> To investigate and assess the differences in crestal bone loss (CBL) between wide-diameter, external-hexagon-connection implants restored with platform-switching (PS) and platform-matching (PM) restorations with a follow-up of 10 years. <b>Materials and Methods:</b> This study retrospectively analyzed the updated and enlarged dataset of a 5-year prospective clinical study at 10-year follow-up. The data concerns 182 healthy adult subjects treated in a private dental practice who received a single wide-diameter implant with an external hexagon connection in the molar area, restored with either a PS restoration (test) or PM restoration (control). The amount of CBL was radiographically measured at each annual follow-up, as well as after 5 and 10 years of implant loading. In evaluating the association between the two types of abutments and bone loss (including change over time), a linear mixed effects model was run for longitudinal data. <b>Results:</b> Implants connected with PS restorations exhibited significantly lower reduction (0.25 mm) in CBL than those joined to PM restorations (<i>P</i> < .001; 95% CI from 0.22 to 0.29). However, both groups presented a higher increase in bone loss during the first year (0.58 mm in PS and 0.83 mm in PM) and a linear increment thereafter until the 10-year follow-up (0.046 mm/year; <i>P</i> < .001; 95% CI from .042 to .049). <b>Conclusion:</b> Notwithstanding the limitations of this study, it can be concluded that after 10 years of follow-up, the implant with a wide diameter and external-hexagon connection restored with a PS abutment seems to be more effective in reducing bone loss compared with the PM abutment.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":50298,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"International Journal of Oral & Maxillofacial Implants\",\"volume\":\"38 1\",\"pages\":\"46-52\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.7000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-01-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"1\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"International Journal of Oral & Maxillofacial Implants\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.11607/jomi.9744\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"DENTISTRY, ORAL SURGERY & MEDICINE\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"International Journal of Oral & Maxillofacial Implants","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.11607/jomi.9744","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"DENTISTRY, ORAL SURGERY & MEDICINE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

摘要

目的:研究平台切换(PS)与平台匹配(PM)修复的宽直径外六角连接种植体在冠骨丢失(CBL)方面的差异,随访10年。材料和方法:本研究回顾性分析了一项更新和扩大的5年前瞻性临床研究数据集,随访10年。数据涉及182名在私人牙科诊所接受治疗的健康成人受试者,他们在磨牙区域接受单一宽直径种植体外六边形连接,使用PS修复(测试)或PM修复(对照)修复。在每年的随访中,以及在植入5年和10年后,用x线摄影测量CBL的量。为了评估两种基台与骨质流失(包括随时间的变化)之间的关系,我们对纵向数据运行了一个线性混合效应模型。结果:种植体与PS修复体连接的CBL减少幅度(0.25 mm)明显低于与PM修复体连接的CBL (P < 0.001;95% CI从0.22到0.29)。然而,两组在第一年的骨质流失增加都较高(PS组为0.58 mm, PM组为0.83 mm),此后呈线性增加,直到10年随访(0.046 mm/年;P < .001;95% CI从0.042到0.049)。结论:尽管本研究存在局限性,但经过10年的随访,我们可以得出结论,与PM基牙相比,PS基牙修复宽直径外六角形连接的种植体在减少骨质流失方面似乎更有效。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Influence of Platform-Switched Restoration on Bone Resorption in Patients Treated with Wide-Diameter, External-Hex-Connection Dental Implants: A 10-Year Follow-up Study.

Purpose: To investigate and assess the differences in crestal bone loss (CBL) between wide-diameter, external-hexagon-connection implants restored with platform-switching (PS) and platform-matching (PM) restorations with a follow-up of 10 years. Materials and Methods: This study retrospectively analyzed the updated and enlarged dataset of a 5-year prospective clinical study at 10-year follow-up. The data concerns 182 healthy adult subjects treated in a private dental practice who received a single wide-diameter implant with an external hexagon connection in the molar area, restored with either a PS restoration (test) or PM restoration (control). The amount of CBL was radiographically measured at each annual follow-up, as well as after 5 and 10 years of implant loading. In evaluating the association between the two types of abutments and bone loss (including change over time), a linear mixed effects model was run for longitudinal data. Results: Implants connected with PS restorations exhibited significantly lower reduction (0.25 mm) in CBL than those joined to PM restorations (P < .001; 95% CI from 0.22 to 0.29). However, both groups presented a higher increase in bone loss during the first year (0.58 mm in PS and 0.83 mm in PM) and a linear increment thereafter until the 10-year follow-up (0.046 mm/year; P < .001; 95% CI from .042 to .049). Conclusion: Notwithstanding the limitations of this study, it can be concluded that after 10 years of follow-up, the implant with a wide diameter and external-hexagon connection restored with a PS abutment seems to be more effective in reducing bone loss compared with the PM abutment.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
3.30
自引率
5.00%
发文量
115
审稿时长
6 months
期刊介绍: Edited by Steven E. Eckert, DDS, MS ISSN (Print): 0882-2786 ISSN (Online): 1942-4434 This highly regarded, often-cited journal integrates clinical and scientific data to improve methods and results of oral and maxillofacial implant therapy. It presents pioneering research, technology, clinical applications, reviews of the literature, seminal studies, emerging technology, position papers, and consensus studies, as well as the many clinical and therapeutic innovations that ensue as a result of these efforts. The editorial board is composed of recognized opinion leaders in their respective areas of expertise and reflects the international reach of the journal. Under their leadership, JOMI maintains its strong scientific integrity while expanding its influence within the field of implant dentistry. JOMI’s popular regular feature "Thematic Abstract Review" presents a review of abstracts of recently published articles on a specific topical area of interest each issue.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信