玩忽职守导致的死亡。波兰医学纪律委员会的决定。

Q4 Medicine
Iwona Wrześniewska-Wal
{"title":"玩忽职守导致的死亡。波兰医学纪律委员会的决定。","authors":"Iwona Wrześniewska-Wal","doi":"10.5114/amsik.2021.104969","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Aim: </strong>The presented cases are related to failure of due diligence found in the binding decisions of medical disciplinary boards in three centres in Poland, showing in what percentage of the cases the patient died, and answering the question of whether the number of deaths changed, and if yes, then why.</p><p><strong>Material and methods: </strong>The material for this study was collected as a result of the analysis of disciplinary files from 410 final and binding cases before the regional boards in Warsaw, Poznan, and Lodz in 2015-2018, which covers 12.5% of Poland's total caseload.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>During the 4 years of decisions studied, one can observe only a minimal downward trend in the number of cases relating to failure of due diligence by physicians in diagnosis and treatment. Patient deaths occurred mainly in such medical fields as surgery, neurology, cardiology, and obstetrics, in 2015-2016 - a total of 28 n Warsaw, 23 in Lodz, and 8 in Poznan.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>A reduction in the number of such cases coming up before medical disciplinary boards is primarily the consequence of the growing involvement of the law enforcement/public prosecutors' offices for offences involving medical error. Currently, the legal awareness of Polish patients or, in this case, their families is focused not so much on the fact that a case has to be brought for potential medical error but on which path to take the case so as to win damages, compensation, or an annuity from the physician or from the medical establishment.</p>","PeriodicalId":35709,"journal":{"name":"Archiwum Medycyny Sadowej i Kryminologii","volume":"71 1-2","pages":"31-37"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2021-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Malpractice-related deaths resulting from failure of due diligence. Decisions of Polish medical disciplinary boards.\",\"authors\":\"Iwona Wrześniewska-Wal\",\"doi\":\"10.5114/amsik.2021.104969\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Aim: </strong>The presented cases are related to failure of due diligence found in the binding decisions of medical disciplinary boards in three centres in Poland, showing in what percentage of the cases the patient died, and answering the question of whether the number of deaths changed, and if yes, then why.</p><p><strong>Material and methods: </strong>The material for this study was collected as a result of the analysis of disciplinary files from 410 final and binding cases before the regional boards in Warsaw, Poznan, and Lodz in 2015-2018, which covers 12.5% of Poland's total caseload.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>During the 4 years of decisions studied, one can observe only a minimal downward trend in the number of cases relating to failure of due diligence by physicians in diagnosis and treatment. Patient deaths occurred mainly in such medical fields as surgery, neurology, cardiology, and obstetrics, in 2015-2016 - a total of 28 n Warsaw, 23 in Lodz, and 8 in Poznan.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>A reduction in the number of such cases coming up before medical disciplinary boards is primarily the consequence of the growing involvement of the law enforcement/public prosecutors' offices for offences involving medical error. Currently, the legal awareness of Polish patients or, in this case, their families is focused not so much on the fact that a case has to be brought for potential medical error but on which path to take the case so as to win damages, compensation, or an annuity from the physician or from the medical establishment.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":35709,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Archiwum Medycyny Sadowej i Kryminologii\",\"volume\":\"71 1-2\",\"pages\":\"31-37\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2021-01-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"1\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Archiwum Medycyny Sadowej i Kryminologii\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.5114/amsik.2021.104969\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q4\",\"JCRName\":\"Medicine\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Archiwum Medycyny Sadowej i Kryminologii","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.5114/amsik.2021.104969","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"Medicine","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

摘要

目的:所提交的案例与波兰三个中心医学纪律委员会的有约束力的决定中发现的尽职调查失败有关,显示了患者死亡的病例百分比,并回答了死亡人数是否发生变化的问题,如果是,那么原因是什么。材料和方法:本研究的材料是通过分析2015-2018年华沙、波兹南和罗兹地区委员会提交的410起最终和有约束力的案件的纪律档案而收集的,这些案件占波兰总案件量的12.5%。结果:在4年的决策研究中,人们可以观察到,与医生在诊断和治疗中尽职调查失败有关的病例数量只有最小的下降趋势。2015-2016年,患者死亡主要发生在外科、神经病学、心脏病学和产科等医疗领域——华沙共有28人,罗兹23人,波兹南8人。结论:提交给医疗纪律委员会的此类案件数量减少,主要是执法部门/检察官办公室越来越多地参与涉及医疗差错的违法行为的结果。目前,波兰病人或在这种情况下,其家属的法律意识重点不在于必须就潜在的医疗错误提起诉讼这一事实,而在于采取何种诉讼方式,以便从医生或医疗机构那里赢得损害赔偿、赔偿或年金。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Malpractice-related deaths resulting from failure of due diligence. Decisions of Polish medical disciplinary boards.

Aim: The presented cases are related to failure of due diligence found in the binding decisions of medical disciplinary boards in three centres in Poland, showing in what percentage of the cases the patient died, and answering the question of whether the number of deaths changed, and if yes, then why.

Material and methods: The material for this study was collected as a result of the analysis of disciplinary files from 410 final and binding cases before the regional boards in Warsaw, Poznan, and Lodz in 2015-2018, which covers 12.5% of Poland's total caseload.

Results: During the 4 years of decisions studied, one can observe only a minimal downward trend in the number of cases relating to failure of due diligence by physicians in diagnosis and treatment. Patient deaths occurred mainly in such medical fields as surgery, neurology, cardiology, and obstetrics, in 2015-2016 - a total of 28 n Warsaw, 23 in Lodz, and 8 in Poznan.

Conclusions: A reduction in the number of such cases coming up before medical disciplinary boards is primarily the consequence of the growing involvement of the law enforcement/public prosecutors' offices for offences involving medical error. Currently, the legal awareness of Polish patients or, in this case, their families is focused not so much on the fact that a case has to be brought for potential medical error but on which path to take the case so as to win damages, compensation, or an annuity from the physician or from the medical establishment.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
0.60
自引率
0.00%
发文量
12
审稿时长
12 weeks
期刊介绍: Archiwum Medycyny Sądowej i Kryminologii przyjmuje w języku polskim: prace doświadczalne, poglądowe, kazuistyczne, artykuły o charakterze szkoleniowym z medycyny sądowej, kryminologii i dziedzin pokrewnych, opracowania z zakresu etyki i deontologii lekarskiej, streszczenia prac obcych, oceny książek, sprawozdania z działalności PTMSiK, sprawozdania ze zjazdów krajowych i zagranicznych, komunikaty Zarządu Głównego PTMSiK, listy do Redakcji. Autor powinien podać, do jakiej kategorii zalicza tekst nadesłanej pracy. Przyjmowane do druku będą również prace autorów zagranicznych w języku angielskim.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信