Oddi括约肌上方与两侧塑料支架置入治疗良性胆道门狭窄的疗效比较。

IF 0.6 4区 医学 Q4 MEDICINE, RESEARCH & EXPERIMENTAL
Hitomi Himei, Hironari Kato, Yosuke Saragai, Yuki Fujii, Tatsuhiro Yamazaki, Daisuke Uchida, Kazuyuki Matsumoto, Shigeru Horiguchi, Koichiro Tsutsumi, Hiroyuki Okada
{"title":"Oddi括约肌上方与两侧塑料支架置入治疗良性胆道门狭窄的疗效比较。","authors":"Hitomi Himei,&nbsp;Hironari Kato,&nbsp;Yosuke Saragai,&nbsp;Yuki Fujii,&nbsp;Tatsuhiro Yamazaki,&nbsp;Daisuke Uchida,&nbsp;Kazuyuki Matsumoto,&nbsp;Shigeru Horiguchi,&nbsp;Koichiro Tsutsumi,&nbsp;Hiroyuki Okada","doi":"10.18926/AMO/65494","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>We investigated the efficacy and safety of endoscopic plastic stent (PS) placement for hilar benign biliary strictures (BBSs) and compared cases with PS placement above (inside stent, IS) and across (usual stent, US) the sphincter of Oddi. Patients who underwent initial endoscopic PS placement for hilar BBSs between August 2012 and December 2021 were retrospectively analyzed. Hilar BBSs in 88 patients were investigated. Clinical success was achieved in 81 of these cases (92.0%), including 38 patients in the IS group and 43 patients in the US group. Unexpected stent exchange (uSE) before the first scheduled PS exchange occurred in 18 cases (22.2%). The median time from first stent placement to uSE was 35 days. There was no significant difference in the rate and median time to uSE between the two groups. The rates of adverse events such as pancreatitis or cholangitis in the two groups did not significantly differ. However, the rate of difficult stent removal in the IS group (15.8%) was significantly higher than that in the US group (0%) (p=0.0019). US placement is preferable to IS placement for scheduled stent exchange, as it offers the same effectiveness and risk of adverse events with easier stent removal.</p>","PeriodicalId":7017,"journal":{"name":"Acta medica Okayama","volume":"77 3","pages":"291-299"},"PeriodicalIF":0.6000,"publicationDate":"2023-06-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"A Comparison of the Efficacy of Plastic Stent Placement Above and Across the Sphincter of Oddi for Benign Biliary Hilar Stricture.\",\"authors\":\"Hitomi Himei,&nbsp;Hironari Kato,&nbsp;Yosuke Saragai,&nbsp;Yuki Fujii,&nbsp;Tatsuhiro Yamazaki,&nbsp;Daisuke Uchida,&nbsp;Kazuyuki Matsumoto,&nbsp;Shigeru Horiguchi,&nbsp;Koichiro Tsutsumi,&nbsp;Hiroyuki Okada\",\"doi\":\"10.18926/AMO/65494\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p>We investigated the efficacy and safety of endoscopic plastic stent (PS) placement for hilar benign biliary strictures (BBSs) and compared cases with PS placement above (inside stent, IS) and across (usual stent, US) the sphincter of Oddi. Patients who underwent initial endoscopic PS placement for hilar BBSs between August 2012 and December 2021 were retrospectively analyzed. Hilar BBSs in 88 patients were investigated. Clinical success was achieved in 81 of these cases (92.0%), including 38 patients in the IS group and 43 patients in the US group. Unexpected stent exchange (uSE) before the first scheduled PS exchange occurred in 18 cases (22.2%). The median time from first stent placement to uSE was 35 days. There was no significant difference in the rate and median time to uSE between the two groups. The rates of adverse events such as pancreatitis or cholangitis in the two groups did not significantly differ. However, the rate of difficult stent removal in the IS group (15.8%) was significantly higher than that in the US group (0%) (p=0.0019). US placement is preferable to IS placement for scheduled stent exchange, as it offers the same effectiveness and risk of adverse events with easier stent removal.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":7017,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Acta medica Okayama\",\"volume\":\"77 3\",\"pages\":\"291-299\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.6000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-06-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"1\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Acta medica Okayama\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.18926/AMO/65494\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q4\",\"JCRName\":\"MEDICINE, RESEARCH & EXPERIMENTAL\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Acta medica Okayama","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.18926/AMO/65494","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"MEDICINE, RESEARCH & EXPERIMENTAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

摘要

我们探讨了内镜下塑料支架(PS)置入治疗肝门良性胆道狭窄(BBSs)的疗效和安全性,并比较了PS置入Oddi括约肌上方(内支架,IS)和穿过Oddi括约肌(常规支架,US)的病例。回顾性分析2012年8月至2021年12月期间接受首次内镜下PS放置治疗肺门bbs的患者。对88例患者的肺门bbs进行了研究。临床成功81例(92.0%),其中IS组38例,US组43例。18例(22.2%)患者在第一次计划支架置换前发生意外支架置换(uSE)。从第一次支架置入到使用的中位时间为35天。两组间的使用率和中位使用时间无显著差异。两组的不良事件发生率如胰腺炎或胆管炎没有显著差异。然而,IS组支架取出困难率(15.8%)明显高于US组(0%)(p=0.0019)。对于预定的支架置换,US置入术比is置入术更可取,因为它具有相同的有效性和不良事件风险,并且更容易取出支架。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
A Comparison of the Efficacy of Plastic Stent Placement Above and Across the Sphincter of Oddi for Benign Biliary Hilar Stricture.

We investigated the efficacy and safety of endoscopic plastic stent (PS) placement for hilar benign biliary strictures (BBSs) and compared cases with PS placement above (inside stent, IS) and across (usual stent, US) the sphincter of Oddi. Patients who underwent initial endoscopic PS placement for hilar BBSs between August 2012 and December 2021 were retrospectively analyzed. Hilar BBSs in 88 patients were investigated. Clinical success was achieved in 81 of these cases (92.0%), including 38 patients in the IS group and 43 patients in the US group. Unexpected stent exchange (uSE) before the first scheduled PS exchange occurred in 18 cases (22.2%). The median time from first stent placement to uSE was 35 days. There was no significant difference in the rate and median time to uSE between the two groups. The rates of adverse events such as pancreatitis or cholangitis in the two groups did not significantly differ. However, the rate of difficult stent removal in the IS group (15.8%) was significantly higher than that in the US group (0%) (p=0.0019). US placement is preferable to IS placement for scheduled stent exchange, as it offers the same effectiveness and risk of adverse events with easier stent removal.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Acta medica Okayama
Acta medica Okayama 医学-医学:研究与实验
CiteScore
1.00
自引率
0.00%
发文量
110
审稿时长
6-12 weeks
期刊介绍: Acta Medica Okayama (AMO) publishes papers relating to all areas of basic and clinical medical science. Papers may be submitted by those not affiliated with Okayama University. Only original papers which have not been published or submitted elsewhere and timely review articles should be submitted. Original papers may be Full-length Articles or Short Communications. Case Reports are considered if they describe significant and substantial new findings. Preliminary observations are not accepted.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信