为本体论探索搭建舞台的完美风暴:对“情感幸福:它是什么以及为什么重要”评论的回应。

IF 2.1 Q2 PSYCHOLOGY
Crystal L. Park, Laura D. Kubzansky, Sandra M. Chafouleas, Richard J. Davidson, Dacher Keltner, Parisa Parsafar, Yeates Conwell, Michelle Y. Martin, Janel Hanmer, Kuan Hong Wang
{"title":"为本体论探索搭建舞台的完美风暴:对“情感幸福:它是什么以及为什么重要”评论的回应。","authors":"Crystal L. Park,&nbsp;Laura D. Kubzansky,&nbsp;Sandra M. Chafouleas,&nbsp;Richard J. Davidson,&nbsp;Dacher Keltner,&nbsp;Parisa Parsafar,&nbsp;Yeates Conwell,&nbsp;Michelle Y. Martin,&nbsp;Janel Hanmer,&nbsp;Kuan Hong Wang","doi":"10.1007/s42761-022-00169-8","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h2>Abstract\n</h2><div><p>Our target article (Park et al., this issue) described the process of developing a provisional conceptualization of emotional well-being (EWB). In that article, we considered strengths and gaps in current perspectives on a variety of related concepts and ways that the proposed conceptualization of EWB informs our evaluation of measures and methods of assessment and identification of its causes and consequences. We concluded with recommendations for moving the framework and the field forward. Eight rich, thoughtful, and highly engaged commentaries addressed the target article. Collectively, these commentaries illustrate both points of consensus and areas of substantial disagreement, providing a potential roadmap for continued work. In this response, we summarize key issues raised and highlight those points raised by multiple commentators or that we considered seminal to advancing future discussion and research.</p></div></div>","PeriodicalId":72119,"journal":{"name":"Affective science","volume":"4 1","pages":"52 - 58"},"PeriodicalIF":2.1000,"publicationDate":"2022-12-14","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://link.springer.com/content/pdf/10.1007/s42761-022-00169-8.pdf","citationCount":"2","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"A Perfect Storm to Set the Stage for Ontological Exploration: Response to Commentaries on “Emotional Well-Being: What It Is and Why It Matters”\",\"authors\":\"Crystal L. Park,&nbsp;Laura D. Kubzansky,&nbsp;Sandra M. Chafouleas,&nbsp;Richard J. Davidson,&nbsp;Dacher Keltner,&nbsp;Parisa Parsafar,&nbsp;Yeates Conwell,&nbsp;Michelle Y. Martin,&nbsp;Janel Hanmer,&nbsp;Kuan Hong Wang\",\"doi\":\"10.1007/s42761-022-00169-8\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><h2>Abstract\\n</h2><div><p>Our target article (Park et al., this issue) described the process of developing a provisional conceptualization of emotional well-being (EWB). In that article, we considered strengths and gaps in current perspectives on a variety of related concepts and ways that the proposed conceptualization of EWB informs our evaluation of measures and methods of assessment and identification of its causes and consequences. We concluded with recommendations for moving the framework and the field forward. Eight rich, thoughtful, and highly engaged commentaries addressed the target article. Collectively, these commentaries illustrate both points of consensus and areas of substantial disagreement, providing a potential roadmap for continued work. In this response, we summarize key issues raised and highlight those points raised by multiple commentators or that we considered seminal to advancing future discussion and research.</p></div></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":72119,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Affective science\",\"volume\":\"4 1\",\"pages\":\"52 - 58\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.1000,\"publicationDate\":\"2022-12-14\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://link.springer.com/content/pdf/10.1007/s42761-022-00169-8.pdf\",\"citationCount\":\"2\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Affective science\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://link.springer.com/article/10.1007/s42761-022-00169-8\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"PSYCHOLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Affective science","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://link.springer.com/article/10.1007/s42761-022-00169-8","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"PSYCHOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 2

摘要

我们的目标文章(Park等人,本期)描述了情绪幸福感(EWB)临时概念化的发展过程。在那篇文章中,我们考虑了当前对各种相关概念的看法的优势和差距,以及拟议的EWB概念化为我们评估措施和方法以及确定其原因和后果提供了信息。最后,我们提出了推动该框架和该领域向前发展的建议。八篇内容丰富、深思熟虑、高度参与的评论文章针对目标文章。总之,这些评论说明了共识点和实质性分歧领域,为继续开展工作提供了潜在的路线图。在这篇回应中,我们总结了提出的关键问题,并强调了多位评论员提出的或我们认为对推进未来讨论和研究具有开创性意义的观点。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
A Perfect Storm to Set the Stage for Ontological Exploration: Response to Commentaries on “Emotional Well-Being: What It Is and Why It Matters”

Abstract

Our target article (Park et al., this issue) described the process of developing a provisional conceptualization of emotional well-being (EWB). In that article, we considered strengths and gaps in current perspectives on a variety of related concepts and ways that the proposed conceptualization of EWB informs our evaluation of measures and methods of assessment and identification of its causes and consequences. We concluded with recommendations for moving the framework and the field forward. Eight rich, thoughtful, and highly engaged commentaries addressed the target article. Collectively, these commentaries illustrate both points of consensus and areas of substantial disagreement, providing a potential roadmap for continued work. In this response, we summarize key issues raised and highlight those points raised by multiple commentators or that we considered seminal to advancing future discussion and research.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
4.40
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信