更多胡萝卜，更少大棒:鼓励全球抗微生物公域的良好管理。

IF 1.8 3区哲学 Q2 ETHICS

Health Care Analysis Pub Date : 2023-03-01 DOI:10.1007/s10728-023-00455-x

Cristian Timmermann

引用次数: 0

摘要

经过时间考验的公地的特点是建立了对不遵守规定者的情况和动机敏感的制裁机制。由于拟议的全球抗微生物药物公域无法经济有效地制定对全球穷人情况始终敏感的制裁机制，我建议集中精力建立一套更广泛的激励措施，鼓励遵守和参与。

本文章由计算机程序翻译，如有差异，请以英文原文为准。

查看原文本刊更多论文

More Carrots, Less Sticks: Encouraging Good Stewardship in the Global Antimicrobial Commons.

Time-tested commons characterize by having instituted sanctioning mechanisms that are sensitive to the circumstances and motivations of non-compliers. As a proposed Global Antimicrobial Commons cannot cost-effectively develop sanctioning mechanisms that are consistently sensitive to the circumstances of the global poor, I suggest concentrating on establishing a wider set of incentives that encourages both compliance and participation.

求助全文

通过发布文献求助，成功后即可免费获取论文全文。去求助

来源期刊

Health Care Analysis Multiple-

CiteScore

4.20

自引率

0.00%

发文量

期刊介绍： Health Care Analysis is a journal that promotes dialogue and debate about conceptual and normative issues related to health and health care, including health systems, healthcare provision, health law, public policy and health, professional health practice, health services organization and decision-making, and health-related education at all levels of clinical medicine, public health and global health. Health Care Analysis seeks to support the conversation between philosophy and policy, in particular illustrating the importance of conceptual and normative analysis to health policy, practice and research. As such, papers accepted for publication are likely to analyse philosophical questions related to health, health care or health policy that focus on one or more of the following: aims or ends, theories, frameworks, concepts, principles, values or ideology. All styles of theoretical analysis are welcome providing that they illuminate conceptual or normative issues and encourage debate between those interested in health, philosophy and policy. Papers must be rigorous, but should strive for accessibility – with care being taken to ensure that their arguments and implications are plain to a broad academic and international audience. In addition to purely theoretical papers, papers grounded in empirical research or case-studies are very welcome so long as they explore the conceptual or normative implications of such work. Authors are encouraged, where possible, to have regard to the social contexts of the issues they are discussing, and all authors should ensure that they indicate the ‘real world’ implications of their work. Health Care Analysis publishes contributions from philosophers, lawyers, social scientists, healthcare educators, healthcare professionals and administrators, and other health-related academics and policy analysts.