测量肤色、水分和油性的低成本设备的内在可靠性和相互可靠性。

IF 1.7 4区 医学 Q3 DERMATOLOGY
Carlos Eduardo Girasol, Flávia Belavenuto Rangon, Guilherme Castro Borsari, Rinaldo Roberto de Jesus Guirro, Elaine Caldeira de Oliveira Guirro
{"title":"测量肤色、水分和油性的低成本设备的内在可靠性和相互可靠性。","authors":"Carlos Eduardo Girasol,&nbsp;Flávia Belavenuto Rangon,&nbsp;Guilherme Castro Borsari,&nbsp;Rinaldo Roberto de Jesus Guirro,&nbsp;Elaine Caldeira de Oliveira Guirro","doi":"10.1097/01.ASW.0000935992.43962.1f","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>To evaluate the intraexaminer and interexaminer reliability of low-cost commercial devices to measure skin tone, moisture, and oiliness; determine associations with the Fitzpatrick Scale; and compare results with those of widely used commercial equipment.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Researchers bilaterally collected a total of 36 samples from 18 participants. For data acquisition, two experienced raters were considered for skin index assessment. Evaluations were conducted independently, with measurements taken at two different times with an interval between them, thus enabling intrarater and interrater reliability measures. The measurements were made with two low-cost devices and compared with those acquired using standard equipment for such analyses.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>For the intraexaminer reliability results, the authors observed intraclass correlation coefficient ranging from moderate to high reliability between these tools (0.747-0.971). Regarding interexaminer reliability, intraclass correlation coefficient ranging from moderate to high (0.541-0.939) were observed. For the results of the correlations, a moderate to a large association was observed for skin tone. However, a small association for moisture was observed among the tools.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Evaluations of skin tonality, oiliness, and moisture showed moderate to excellent intrareliability and interreliability. These methods can be applied in different environments, especially clinics, because of their low cost and ease of use.</p>","PeriodicalId":7489,"journal":{"name":"Advances in Skin & Wound Care","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":1.7000,"publicationDate":"2023-07-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Intrareliability and Interreliability of Low-Cost Devices to Measure Skin Tone, Moisture, and Oiliness.\",\"authors\":\"Carlos Eduardo Girasol,&nbsp;Flávia Belavenuto Rangon,&nbsp;Guilherme Castro Borsari,&nbsp;Rinaldo Roberto de Jesus Guirro,&nbsp;Elaine Caldeira de Oliveira Guirro\",\"doi\":\"10.1097/01.ASW.0000935992.43962.1f\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>To evaluate the intraexaminer and interexaminer reliability of low-cost commercial devices to measure skin tone, moisture, and oiliness; determine associations with the Fitzpatrick Scale; and compare results with those of widely used commercial equipment.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Researchers bilaterally collected a total of 36 samples from 18 participants. For data acquisition, two experienced raters were considered for skin index assessment. Evaluations were conducted independently, with measurements taken at two different times with an interval between them, thus enabling intrarater and interrater reliability measures. The measurements were made with two low-cost devices and compared with those acquired using standard equipment for such analyses.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>For the intraexaminer reliability results, the authors observed intraclass correlation coefficient ranging from moderate to high reliability between these tools (0.747-0.971). Regarding interexaminer reliability, intraclass correlation coefficient ranging from moderate to high (0.541-0.939) were observed. For the results of the correlations, a moderate to a large association was observed for skin tone. However, a small association for moisture was observed among the tools.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Evaluations of skin tonality, oiliness, and moisture showed moderate to excellent intrareliability and interreliability. These methods can be applied in different environments, especially clinics, because of their low cost and ease of use.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":7489,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Advances in Skin & Wound Care\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.7000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-07-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Advances in Skin & Wound Care\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1097/01.ASW.0000935992.43962.1f\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"DERMATOLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Advances in Skin & Wound Care","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1097/01.ASW.0000935992.43962.1f","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"DERMATOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

目的:评价低成本商用仪器测量肤色、水分和油性的可靠性;确定与Fitzpatrick量表的关联;并将结果与广泛使用的商用设备进行比较。方法:研究人员从18名参与者中采集了36份样本。为了获取数据,我们考虑了两位经验丰富的评分者进行皮肤指数评估。评估是独立进行的,在两个不同的时间进行测量,其间间隔一段时间,从而可以测量井内和井间的可靠性。测量是用两种低成本的设备进行的,并与使用标准设备进行分析的结果进行了比较。结果:对于检查员内部信度结果,作者观察到这些工具之间的类内相关系数从中等到高信度不等(0.747-0.971)。在被测者间信度方面,组内相关系数为中至高(0.541 ~ 0.939)。对于相关性的结果,观察到肤色有中等到较大的关联。然而,在工具之间观察到湿度的小关联。结论:对皮肤色调、油性和水分的评估显示出中等到优异的内部可靠性和相互可靠性。这些方法可以应用于不同的环境,特别是诊所,因为它们成本低,易于使用。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Intrareliability and Interreliability of Low-Cost Devices to Measure Skin Tone, Moisture, and Oiliness.

Objective: To evaluate the intraexaminer and interexaminer reliability of low-cost commercial devices to measure skin tone, moisture, and oiliness; determine associations with the Fitzpatrick Scale; and compare results with those of widely used commercial equipment.

Methods: Researchers bilaterally collected a total of 36 samples from 18 participants. For data acquisition, two experienced raters were considered for skin index assessment. Evaluations were conducted independently, with measurements taken at two different times with an interval between them, thus enabling intrarater and interrater reliability measures. The measurements were made with two low-cost devices and compared with those acquired using standard equipment for such analyses.

Results: For the intraexaminer reliability results, the authors observed intraclass correlation coefficient ranging from moderate to high reliability between these tools (0.747-0.971). Regarding interexaminer reliability, intraclass correlation coefficient ranging from moderate to high (0.541-0.939) were observed. For the results of the correlations, a moderate to a large association was observed for skin tone. However, a small association for moisture was observed among the tools.

Conclusions: Evaluations of skin tonality, oiliness, and moisture showed moderate to excellent intrareliability and interreliability. These methods can be applied in different environments, especially clinics, because of their low cost and ease of use.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Advances in Skin & Wound Care
Advances in Skin & Wound Care DERMATOLOGY-NURSING
CiteScore
2.50
自引率
12.50%
发文量
271
审稿时长
>12 weeks
期刊介绍: A peer-reviewed, multidisciplinary journal, Advances in Skin & Wound Care is highly regarded for its unique balance of cutting-edge original research and practical clinical management articles on wounds and other problems of skin integrity. Each issue features CME/CE for physicians and nurses, the first journal in the field to regularly offer continuing education for both disciplines.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信