专业知识对音乐阅读时眼球运动影响的meta分析。

IF 1.3 4区 心理学 Q3 OPHTHALMOLOGY
Joris Perra, Alice Latimier, Bénédicte Poulin-Charronnat, Thierry Baccino, Véronique Drai-Zerbib
{"title":"专业知识对音乐阅读时眼球运动影响的meta分析。","authors":"Joris Perra,&nbsp;Alice Latimier,&nbsp;Bénédicte Poulin-Charronnat,&nbsp;Thierry Baccino,&nbsp;Véronique Drai-Zerbib","doi":"10.16910/jemr.15.4.1","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>The current meta-analysis was conducted on 12 studies comparing the eye movements of expert versus non-expert musicians and attempted to determine which eye movement measures are expertise dependent during music reading. The total dataset of 61 comparisons was divided into four subsets, each concerning one eye-movement variable (i.e., fixation duration, number of fixations, saccade amplitude, and gaze duration). We used a variance estimation method to aggregate the effect sizes. The results support the robust finding of reduced fixation duration in expert musicians (Subset 1, g = -0.72). Due to low statistical power because of limited effect sizes, the results on the number of fixations, saccade amplitude, and gaze duration were not reliable. We conducted meta-regression analyses to determine potential moderators of the effect of expertise on eye movements (i.e., definition of experimental groups, type of musical task performed, type of musical material used or tempo control). Moderator analyses did not yield any reliable results. The need for consistency in the experimental methodology is discussed.</p>","PeriodicalId":15813,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Eye Movement Research","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":1.3000,"publicationDate":"2022-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10266858/pdf/","citationCount":"2","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"A Meta-analysis on the Effect of Expertise on Eye Movements during Music Reading.\",\"authors\":\"Joris Perra,&nbsp;Alice Latimier,&nbsp;Bénédicte Poulin-Charronnat,&nbsp;Thierry Baccino,&nbsp;Véronique Drai-Zerbib\",\"doi\":\"10.16910/jemr.15.4.1\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p>The current meta-analysis was conducted on 12 studies comparing the eye movements of expert versus non-expert musicians and attempted to determine which eye movement measures are expertise dependent during music reading. The total dataset of 61 comparisons was divided into four subsets, each concerning one eye-movement variable (i.e., fixation duration, number of fixations, saccade amplitude, and gaze duration). We used a variance estimation method to aggregate the effect sizes. The results support the robust finding of reduced fixation duration in expert musicians (Subset 1, g = -0.72). Due to low statistical power because of limited effect sizes, the results on the number of fixations, saccade amplitude, and gaze duration were not reliable. We conducted meta-regression analyses to determine potential moderators of the effect of expertise on eye movements (i.e., definition of experimental groups, type of musical task performed, type of musical material used or tempo control). Moderator analyses did not yield any reliable results. The need for consistency in the experimental methodology is discussed.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":15813,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of Eye Movement Research\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.3000,\"publicationDate\":\"2022-01-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10266858/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"2\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of Eye Movement Research\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.16910/jemr.15.4.1\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"心理学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"OPHTHALMOLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Eye Movement Research","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.16910/jemr.15.4.1","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"心理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"OPHTHALMOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 2

摘要

当前的荟萃分析对12项研究进行了比较,比较了专家和非专业音乐家的眼球运动,并试图确定在音乐阅读过程中哪些眼球运动是专业依赖的。61个比较数据集被分为四个子集,每个子集涉及一个眼动变量(即注视时间、注视次数、扫视幅度和凝视时间)。我们使用方差估计方法来汇总效应大小。结果支持专家音乐家的注视时间缩短的强有力的发现(子集1,g = -0.72)。由于效应量有限,统计能力较低,注视次数、扫视幅度和凝视持续时间的结果不可靠。我们进行了meta回归分析,以确定专业知识对眼球运动影响的潜在调节因素(即实验组的定义、执行的音乐任务类型、使用的音乐材料类型或节奏控制)。慢化剂分析没有产生任何可靠的结果。讨论了实验方法一致性的必要性。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。

A Meta-analysis on the Effect of Expertise on Eye Movements during Music Reading.

A Meta-analysis on the Effect of Expertise on Eye Movements during Music Reading.

A Meta-analysis on the Effect of Expertise on Eye Movements during Music Reading.

A Meta-analysis on the Effect of Expertise on Eye Movements during Music Reading.

The current meta-analysis was conducted on 12 studies comparing the eye movements of expert versus non-expert musicians and attempted to determine which eye movement measures are expertise dependent during music reading. The total dataset of 61 comparisons was divided into four subsets, each concerning one eye-movement variable (i.e., fixation duration, number of fixations, saccade amplitude, and gaze duration). We used a variance estimation method to aggregate the effect sizes. The results support the robust finding of reduced fixation duration in expert musicians (Subset 1, g = -0.72). Due to low statistical power because of limited effect sizes, the results on the number of fixations, saccade amplitude, and gaze duration were not reliable. We conducted meta-regression analyses to determine potential moderators of the effect of expertise on eye movements (i.e., definition of experimental groups, type of musical task performed, type of musical material used or tempo control). Moderator analyses did not yield any reliable results. The need for consistency in the experimental methodology is discussed.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
2.90
自引率
33.30%
发文量
10
审稿时长
10 weeks
期刊介绍: The Journal of Eye Movement Research is an open-access, peer-reviewed scientific periodical devoted to all aspects of oculomotor functioning including methodology of eye recording, neurophysiological and cognitive models, attention, reading, as well as applications in neurology, ergonomy, media research and other areas,
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信