乳腺癌七种细胞学三级分级系统与标准组织学分级的相关性评价:一项4年半的研究。

IF 1.6 4区 医学 Q3 PATHOLOGY
Acta Cytologica Pub Date : 2023-01-01 Epub Date: 2023-06-16 DOI:10.1159/000531463
Shweta Pai, Srinivasa Murthy V
{"title":"乳腺癌七种细胞学三级分级系统与标准组织学分级的相关性评价:一项4年半的研究。","authors":"Shweta Pai,&nbsp;Srinivasa Murthy V","doi":"10.1159/000531463","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>The early diagnosis of breast carcinoma is of paramount importance in its management. Fine-needle aspiration cytology (FNAC) has the potential to play a pivotal role in providing the relevant information on the aggressiveness of this tumor. But there is no gold standard when it comes to cytological grading of breast carcinoma as there is no consensus between the pathologists and also the clinicians as to which grading is as par with the gold standard Elston-Ellis modification of Scarff-Bloom-Richardson (SBR) histological grading. This study was undertaken to study seven cytological 3-tier grading systems, namely, Robinson's, Fisher's, Mouriquand's, Dabbs', Khan's, Taniguchi's, and Howells's and to correlate them with the Elston-Ellis modification of SBR histological grading system so as to determine the finest cytological grading system which could be reliably used in our routine practice.</p><p><strong>Material and methods: </strong>A total of 117 breast carcinoma cases diagnosed on FNAC were graded using seven 3-tier cytological grading systems and were correlated with Elston-Ellis modification of SBR histological grading system. Concordance, kappa measurement, and various correlation studies were done using SPSS software version 2021.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Robinson's method showed a better concordance (84.61%), a better correlation (Spearman = 0.750, τ = 0.731, p &lt; 0.001), and a substantial kappa value of agreement (κ = 0.701) with SBR grading system compared to other system closely followed by Fisher's system.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Even though all the seven 3-tier cytological grading systems positively correlated with the SBR histologic grading of breast carcinoma, Robinson's method showed better concordance and correlation with a substantial kappa value of agreement in comparison to other 3-tier cytology grading systems. Hence, Robinson's grading which is simpler and also feasible should be incorporated in the routine cytology reporting of breast carcinoma.</p>","PeriodicalId":6959,"journal":{"name":"Acta Cytologica","volume":" ","pages":"482-492"},"PeriodicalIF":1.6000,"publicationDate":"2023-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Correlative Evaluation of Seven Cytological 3-Tier Grading Systems of Breast Carcinoma with the Standard Histological Grading: A 4 and ½ Year Study.\",\"authors\":\"Shweta Pai,&nbsp;Srinivasa Murthy V\",\"doi\":\"10.1159/000531463\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>The early diagnosis of breast carcinoma is of paramount importance in its management. Fine-needle aspiration cytology (FNAC) has the potential to play a pivotal role in providing the relevant information on the aggressiveness of this tumor. But there is no gold standard when it comes to cytological grading of breast carcinoma as there is no consensus between the pathologists and also the clinicians as to which grading is as par with the gold standard Elston-Ellis modification of Scarff-Bloom-Richardson (SBR) histological grading. This study was undertaken to study seven cytological 3-tier grading systems, namely, Robinson's, Fisher's, Mouriquand's, Dabbs', Khan's, Taniguchi's, and Howells's and to correlate them with the Elston-Ellis modification of SBR histological grading system so as to determine the finest cytological grading system which could be reliably used in our routine practice.</p><p><strong>Material and methods: </strong>A total of 117 breast carcinoma cases diagnosed on FNAC were graded using seven 3-tier cytological grading systems and were correlated with Elston-Ellis modification of SBR histological grading system. Concordance, kappa measurement, and various correlation studies were done using SPSS software version 2021.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Robinson's method showed a better concordance (84.61%), a better correlation (Spearman = 0.750, τ = 0.731, p &lt; 0.001), and a substantial kappa value of agreement (κ = 0.701) with SBR grading system compared to other system closely followed by Fisher's system.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Even though all the seven 3-tier cytological grading systems positively correlated with the SBR histologic grading of breast carcinoma, Robinson's method showed better concordance and correlation with a substantial kappa value of agreement in comparison to other 3-tier cytology grading systems. Hence, Robinson's grading which is simpler and also feasible should be incorporated in the routine cytology reporting of breast carcinoma.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":6959,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Acta Cytologica\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"482-492\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.6000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-01-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Acta Cytologica\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1159/000531463\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2023/6/16 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"Epub\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"PATHOLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Acta Cytologica","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1159/000531463","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2023/6/16 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"PATHOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

引言:乳腺癌的早期诊断对其治疗至关重要。细针抽吸细胞学(FNAC)有可能在提供有关该肿瘤侵袭性的相关信息方面发挥关键作用。但是,在乳腺癌的细胞学分级方面没有金标准,因为病理学家和临床医生之间没有就哪种分级与金标准Elston Ellis对Scarff-Bloom-Richardson(SBR)组织学分级的修改达成一致。本研究旨在研究Robinson氏、Fisher氏、Mouriquand氏、Dabbs氏、Khan氏、Taniguchi氏和Howells氏七种细胞学三级分级系统,并将其与SBR组织学分级系统的Elston Ellis修改相关联,以确定可在日常实践中可靠使用的最佳细胞学分级系统。材料和方法:共有117例经FNAC诊断的乳腺癌病例使用七个三层细胞学分级系统进行分级,并与Elston Ellis改良的SBR组织学分级系统相关联。使用SPSS软件版本2021进行一致性、kappa测量和各种相关性研究。结果:与Fisher系统紧随其后的其他系统相比,Robinson方法与SBR分级系统显示出更好的一致性(84.61%)、更好的相关性(Spearman=0.750,τ=0.731,p<;0.001)和显著的kappa一致性值(κ=0.701)。结论:尽管所有七个三级细胞学分级系统都与乳腺癌的SBR组织学分级呈正相关,但与其他三级细胞学评分系统相比,Robinson的方法显示出更好的一致性和相关性,具有显著的一致性kappa值。因此,Robinson分级更简单可行,应纳入乳腺癌的常规细胞学报告中。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Correlative Evaluation of Seven Cytological 3-Tier Grading Systems of Breast Carcinoma with the Standard Histological Grading: A 4 and ½ Year Study.

Introduction: The early diagnosis of breast carcinoma is of paramount importance in its management. Fine-needle aspiration cytology (FNAC) has the potential to play a pivotal role in providing the relevant information on the aggressiveness of this tumor. But there is no gold standard when it comes to cytological grading of breast carcinoma as there is no consensus between the pathologists and also the clinicians as to which grading is as par with the gold standard Elston-Ellis modification of Scarff-Bloom-Richardson (SBR) histological grading. This study was undertaken to study seven cytological 3-tier grading systems, namely, Robinson's, Fisher's, Mouriquand's, Dabbs', Khan's, Taniguchi's, and Howells's and to correlate them with the Elston-Ellis modification of SBR histological grading system so as to determine the finest cytological grading system which could be reliably used in our routine practice.

Material and methods: A total of 117 breast carcinoma cases diagnosed on FNAC were graded using seven 3-tier cytological grading systems and were correlated with Elston-Ellis modification of SBR histological grading system. Concordance, kappa measurement, and various correlation studies were done using SPSS software version 2021.

Results: Robinson's method showed a better concordance (84.61%), a better correlation (Spearman = 0.750, τ = 0.731, p < 0.001), and a substantial kappa value of agreement (κ = 0.701) with SBR grading system compared to other system closely followed by Fisher's system.

Conclusions: Even though all the seven 3-tier cytological grading systems positively correlated with the SBR histologic grading of breast carcinoma, Robinson's method showed better concordance and correlation with a substantial kappa value of agreement in comparison to other 3-tier cytology grading systems. Hence, Robinson's grading which is simpler and also feasible should be incorporated in the routine cytology reporting of breast carcinoma.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Acta Cytologica
Acta Cytologica 生物-病理学
CiteScore
3.70
自引率
11.10%
发文量
46
审稿时长
4-8 weeks
期刊介绍: With articles offering an excellent balance between clinical cytology and cytopathology, ''Acta Cytologica'' fosters the understanding of the pathogenetic mechanisms behind cytomorphology and thus facilitates the translation of frontline research into clinical practice. As the official journal of the International Academy of Cytology and affiliated to over 50 national cytology societies around the world, ''Acta Cytologica'' evaluates new and existing diagnostic applications of scientific advances as well as their clinical correlations. Original papers, review articles, meta-analyses, novel insights from clinical practice, and letters to the editor cover topics from diagnostic cytopathology, gynecologic and non-gynecologic cytopathology to fine needle aspiration, molecular techniques and their diagnostic applications. As the perfect reference for practical use, ''Acta Cytologica'' addresses a multidisciplinary audience practicing clinical cytopathology, cell biology, oncology, interventional radiology, otorhinolaryngology, gastroenterology, urology, pulmonology and preventive medicine.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信