沙特阿拉伯抗纤维化治疗背景下特发性肺纤维化的生存分析。

IF 2.1 4区 医学 Q3 CARDIAC & CARDIOVASCULAR SYSTEMS
Annals of Thoracic Medicine Pub Date : 2023-04-01 Epub Date: 2023-04-25 DOI:10.4103/atm.atm_264_22
Mohammed Ayaz Khan, Basma Al Ghamdi, Mohammed Alhamadi, Rajkumar Rajendram, Sami Alyami, Majed Al-Gamedi, Abdullah Al-Harbi, Hamdan Al-Jahdali
{"title":"沙特阿拉伯抗纤维化治疗背景下特发性肺纤维化的生存分析。","authors":"Mohammed Ayaz Khan,&nbsp;Basma Al Ghamdi,&nbsp;Mohammed Alhamadi,&nbsp;Rajkumar Rajendram,&nbsp;Sami Alyami,&nbsp;Majed Al-Gamedi,&nbsp;Abdullah Al-Harbi,&nbsp;Hamdan Al-Jahdali","doi":"10.4103/atm.atm_264_22","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>The prognosis of idiopathic pulmonary fibrosis (IPF) can be predicted by the gender, age, and physiology (GAP) index. However, antifibrotic therapy (i.e., nintedanib and pirfenidone) may improve survival.</p><p><strong>Aims: </strong>This study aimed to compare the outcomes of antifibrotic-treated IPF with the survival predicted by the GAP index.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A retrospective cohort study was conducted from March 2014 to January 2020. The electronic health-care records of all IPF patients treated with nintedanib or pirfenidone were reviewed. Besides standard demographic and mortality data, the variables required to calculate the GAP index were also extracted.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Eighty-one patients (male 55, 68%; age 71.4 ± 10.2 years) with IPF received antifibrotic therapy (nintedanib 44.4%; pirfenidone 55.6%; mean follow-up 35 ± 16.5 months). Cumulative mortality (whole cohort 3 years 12%; 4 years 26%; 5 years 33%) was significantly less than predicted by the GAP index.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>The survival of antifibrotic-treated IPF is better than predicted by the GAP index. Novel systems for prognostication are required. The survival benefit from pirfenidone and nintedanib seem similar overall.</p>","PeriodicalId":50760,"journal":{"name":"Annals of Thoracic Medicine","volume":"18 2","pages":"79-85"},"PeriodicalIF":2.1000,"publicationDate":"2023-04-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://ftp.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pub/pmc/oa_pdf/2b/d4/ATM-18-79.PMC10263079.pdf","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"A survival analysis of idiopathic pulmonary fibrosis in the context of antifibrotic therapy in Saudi Arabia.\",\"authors\":\"Mohammed Ayaz Khan,&nbsp;Basma Al Ghamdi,&nbsp;Mohammed Alhamadi,&nbsp;Rajkumar Rajendram,&nbsp;Sami Alyami,&nbsp;Majed Al-Gamedi,&nbsp;Abdullah Al-Harbi,&nbsp;Hamdan Al-Jahdali\",\"doi\":\"10.4103/atm.atm_264_22\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Background: </strong>The prognosis of idiopathic pulmonary fibrosis (IPF) can be predicted by the gender, age, and physiology (GAP) index. However, antifibrotic therapy (i.e., nintedanib and pirfenidone) may improve survival.</p><p><strong>Aims: </strong>This study aimed to compare the outcomes of antifibrotic-treated IPF with the survival predicted by the GAP index.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A retrospective cohort study was conducted from March 2014 to January 2020. The electronic health-care records of all IPF patients treated with nintedanib or pirfenidone were reviewed. Besides standard demographic and mortality data, the variables required to calculate the GAP index were also extracted.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Eighty-one patients (male 55, 68%; age 71.4 ± 10.2 years) with IPF received antifibrotic therapy (nintedanib 44.4%; pirfenidone 55.6%; mean follow-up 35 ± 16.5 months). Cumulative mortality (whole cohort 3 years 12%; 4 years 26%; 5 years 33%) was significantly less than predicted by the GAP index.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>The survival of antifibrotic-treated IPF is better than predicted by the GAP index. Novel systems for prognostication are required. The survival benefit from pirfenidone and nintedanib seem similar overall.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":50760,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Annals of Thoracic Medicine\",\"volume\":\"18 2\",\"pages\":\"79-85\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.1000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-04-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://ftp.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pub/pmc/oa_pdf/2b/d4/ATM-18-79.PMC10263079.pdf\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Annals of Thoracic Medicine\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.4103/atm.atm_264_22\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2023/4/25 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"Epub\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"CARDIAC & CARDIOVASCULAR SYSTEMS\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Annals of Thoracic Medicine","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.4103/atm.atm_264_22","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2023/4/25 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"CARDIAC & CARDIOVASCULAR SYSTEMS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

背景:特发性肺纤维化(IPF)的预后可以通过性别、年龄和生理学(GAP)指数来预测。然而,抗纤维化治疗(即宁替达尼和吡非尼酮)可以提高生存率。目的:本研究旨在比较抗纤维化治疗的IPF的结果与GAP指数预测的生存率。方法:2014年3月至2020年1月进行回顾性队列研究。回顾了所有接受尼替达尼或吡非尼酮治疗的IPF患者的电子医疗记录。除了标准的人口统计和死亡率数据外,还提取了计算GAP指数所需的变量。结果:81例IPF患者(男性55.68%;年龄71.4±10.2岁)接受了抗纤维化治疗(尼替达尼44.4%;吡非尼酮55.6%;平均随访35±16.5个月)。累计死亡率(整个队列3年12%;4年26%;5年33%)显著低于GAP指数预测的死亡率。结论:经抗纤维化治疗的IPF的生存率高于GAP指数预测的生存率。需要新的预测系统。吡非尼酮和宁替达尼的生存益处似乎总体相似。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。

A survival analysis of idiopathic pulmonary fibrosis in the context of antifibrotic therapy in Saudi Arabia.

A survival analysis of idiopathic pulmonary fibrosis in the context of antifibrotic therapy in Saudi Arabia.

A survival analysis of idiopathic pulmonary fibrosis in the context of antifibrotic therapy in Saudi Arabia.

Background: The prognosis of idiopathic pulmonary fibrosis (IPF) can be predicted by the gender, age, and physiology (GAP) index. However, antifibrotic therapy (i.e., nintedanib and pirfenidone) may improve survival.

Aims: This study aimed to compare the outcomes of antifibrotic-treated IPF with the survival predicted by the GAP index.

Methods: A retrospective cohort study was conducted from March 2014 to January 2020. The electronic health-care records of all IPF patients treated with nintedanib or pirfenidone were reviewed. Besides standard demographic and mortality data, the variables required to calculate the GAP index were also extracted.

Results: Eighty-one patients (male 55, 68%; age 71.4 ± 10.2 years) with IPF received antifibrotic therapy (nintedanib 44.4%; pirfenidone 55.6%; mean follow-up 35 ± 16.5 months). Cumulative mortality (whole cohort 3 years 12%; 4 years 26%; 5 years 33%) was significantly less than predicted by the GAP index.

Conclusions: The survival of antifibrotic-treated IPF is better than predicted by the GAP index. Novel systems for prognostication are required. The survival benefit from pirfenidone and nintedanib seem similar overall.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Annals of Thoracic Medicine
Annals of Thoracic Medicine CARDIAC & CARDIOVASCULAR SYSTEMS-RESPIRATORY SYSTEM
CiteScore
4.10
自引率
4.30%
发文量
19
审稿时长
>12 weeks
期刊介绍: The journal will cover studies related to multidisciplinary specialties of chest medicine, such as adult and pediatrics pulmonology, thoracic surgery, critical care medicine, respiratory care, transplantation, sleep medicine, related basic medical sciences, and more. The journal also features basic science, special reports, case reports, board review , and more. Editorials and communications to the editor that explore controversial issues and encourage further discussion by physicians dealing with chest medicine.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信