美国预防肥胖:2009年至2019年州级政策回顾

IF 1.9 Q3 ENDOCRINOLOGY & METABOLISM
Lauren P Cleveland, Anna H Grummon, Elsa Konieczynski, Sally Mancini, Anjali Rao, Denise Simon, Jason P Block
{"title":"美国预防肥胖:2009年至2019年州级政策回顾","authors":"Lauren P Cleveland,&nbsp;Anna H Grummon,&nbsp;Elsa Konieczynski,&nbsp;Sally Mancini,&nbsp;Anjali Rao,&nbsp;Denise Simon,&nbsp;Jason P Block","doi":"10.1002/osp4.621","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>Uniquely, state legislators may enact obesity prevention policies tailored to each state's needs and take diverse policy approaches to address obesity prevalence. The objective of this study was to identify and describe state-level obesity-related policies between 2009 and 2019.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Using a database of legislation covering 2009-2019, researchers categorized obesity-related legislation by status (proposed/enacted), topic, and environment impacted. Researchers determined the number of policies proposed; enacted, by political party control; obesity prevalence, by states over time.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>3256 obesity-related policies were proposed among 50 states and Washington DC between 2009 and 2019. Collectively, 18% (593) of policies were enacted; California (96), New and Jersey (57) enacted the most. Across environment and topics, the most enacted policies categorized in school environment (226) and school nutrition (150) topic area. Most policies were proposed (496) and enacted (77) in 2011. On average, Democrat-controlled states had higher enactment rates than Republican-controlled states, as did states with lower (vs. higher) obesity prevalence.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>States have actively pursued obesity-related legislation across multiple topics and environments from 2009 to 2019, with mixed enactment rates. Evaluating the impact of these policies, alone and in combination, will be important to determine whether these state-level efforts reduce obesity.</p>","PeriodicalId":19448,"journal":{"name":"Obesity Science & Practice","volume":"9 2","pages":"95-102"},"PeriodicalIF":1.9000,"publicationDate":"2023-04-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://ftp.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pub/pmc/oa_pdf/87/47/OSP4-9-95.PMC10073818.pdf","citationCount":"1","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Obesity prevention across the US: A review of state-level policies from 2009 to 2019.\",\"authors\":\"Lauren P Cleveland,&nbsp;Anna H Grummon,&nbsp;Elsa Konieczynski,&nbsp;Sally Mancini,&nbsp;Anjali Rao,&nbsp;Denise Simon,&nbsp;Jason P Block\",\"doi\":\"10.1002/osp4.621\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>Uniquely, state legislators may enact obesity prevention policies tailored to each state's needs and take diverse policy approaches to address obesity prevalence. The objective of this study was to identify and describe state-level obesity-related policies between 2009 and 2019.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Using a database of legislation covering 2009-2019, researchers categorized obesity-related legislation by status (proposed/enacted), topic, and environment impacted. Researchers determined the number of policies proposed; enacted, by political party control; obesity prevalence, by states over time.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>3256 obesity-related policies were proposed among 50 states and Washington DC between 2009 and 2019. Collectively, 18% (593) of policies were enacted; California (96), New and Jersey (57) enacted the most. Across environment and topics, the most enacted policies categorized in school environment (226) and school nutrition (150) topic area. Most policies were proposed (496) and enacted (77) in 2011. On average, Democrat-controlled states had higher enactment rates than Republican-controlled states, as did states with lower (vs. higher) obesity prevalence.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>States have actively pursued obesity-related legislation across multiple topics and environments from 2009 to 2019, with mixed enactment rates. Evaluating the impact of these policies, alone and in combination, will be important to determine whether these state-level efforts reduce obesity.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":19448,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Obesity Science & Practice\",\"volume\":\"9 2\",\"pages\":\"95-102\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.9000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-04-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://ftp.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pub/pmc/oa_pdf/87/47/OSP4-9-95.PMC10073818.pdf\",\"citationCount\":\"1\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Obesity Science & Practice\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1002/osp4.621\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"ENDOCRINOLOGY & METABOLISM\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Obesity Science & Practice","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1002/osp4.621","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"ENDOCRINOLOGY & METABOLISM","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

摘要

目的:独特的是,州立法者可以根据每个州的需要制定肥胖预防政策,并采取不同的政策方法来解决肥胖流行问题。本研究的目的是确定和描述2009年至2019年期间国家层面的肥胖相关政策。方法:利用涵盖2009-2019年的立法数据库,研究人员根据状态(提议/颁布)、主题和环境影响对肥胖相关立法进行分类。研究人员确定了提出的政策数量;由政党控制制定的;各州的肥胖患病率。结果:2009年至2019年期间,50个州和华盛顿特区提出了3256项与肥胖相关的政策。总共制定了18%(593项)的政策;加利福尼亚州(96个)、新泽西州(57个)颁布了最多的法律。在环境和主题方面,制定最多的政策分为学校环境(226项)和学校营养(150项)主题领域。大多数政策是在2011年提出的(496项)和颁布的(77项)。平均而言,民主党控制的州的立法率高于共和党控制的州,肥胖患病率较低(与较高)的州也是如此。结论:从2009年到2019年,各州在多个主题和环境中积极推行与肥胖相关的立法,但立法率参差不齐。评估这些政策的影响,无论是单独的还是联合的,对于确定这些州一级的努力是否能减少肥胖是很重要的。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。

Obesity prevention across the US: A review of state-level policies from 2009 to 2019.

Obesity prevention across the US: A review of state-level policies from 2009 to 2019.

Obesity prevention across the US: A review of state-level policies from 2009 to 2019.

Obesity prevention across the US: A review of state-level policies from 2009 to 2019.

Objective: Uniquely, state legislators may enact obesity prevention policies tailored to each state's needs and take diverse policy approaches to address obesity prevalence. The objective of this study was to identify and describe state-level obesity-related policies between 2009 and 2019.

Methods: Using a database of legislation covering 2009-2019, researchers categorized obesity-related legislation by status (proposed/enacted), topic, and environment impacted. Researchers determined the number of policies proposed; enacted, by political party control; obesity prevalence, by states over time.

Results: 3256 obesity-related policies were proposed among 50 states and Washington DC between 2009 and 2019. Collectively, 18% (593) of policies were enacted; California (96), New and Jersey (57) enacted the most. Across environment and topics, the most enacted policies categorized in school environment (226) and school nutrition (150) topic area. Most policies were proposed (496) and enacted (77) in 2011. On average, Democrat-controlled states had higher enactment rates than Republican-controlled states, as did states with lower (vs. higher) obesity prevalence.

Conclusions: States have actively pursued obesity-related legislation across multiple topics and environments from 2009 to 2019, with mixed enactment rates. Evaluating the impact of these policies, alone and in combination, will be important to determine whether these state-level efforts reduce obesity.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Obesity Science & Practice
Obesity Science & Practice ENDOCRINOLOGY & METABOLISM-
CiteScore
4.20
自引率
4.50%
发文量
73
审稿时长
29 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信