正畸陶瓷托槽不同脱粘修复方法重复使用效果的比较评价:一项体外研究。

IF 1.3 4区 医学 Q3 DENTISTRY, ORAL SURGERY & MEDICINE
Katharina Grosch, Jörg Meister, Sanjay D Raval, Ahmed Mahmoud Fouda, Christoph Bourauel
{"title":"正畸陶瓷托槽不同脱粘修复方法重复使用效果的比较评价:一项体外研究。","authors":"Katharina Grosch, Jörg Meister, Sanjay D Raval, Ahmed Mahmoud Fouda, Christoph Bourauel","doi":"10.1007/s00056-023-00469-z","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Purpose: </strong>To investigate the reusability of ceramic brackets in terms of shear bond strength, friction behavior, slot dimension, fracture strength, and color stability.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A total of 90 conventionally debonded and 30 by an Er:YAG laser debonded ceramic brackets were collected. All the used brackets were inspected under a stereomicroscope at 18 × magnification and sorted according to their adhesive remnant index (ARI). Five groups were formed (n = 10): (1) new brackets as a control group, (2) flamed and sandblasted, (3) flamed and acid bathed, (4) laser-reconditioned, and (5) laser-debonded brackets. The bracket groups were tested regarding different properties such as shear bond strength, friction behavior, slot size, fracture strength, and color stability. Analysis of variance (ANOVA) and nonparametric Kruskal-Wallis tests were used for statistical analysis (significance level: p < 0.05).</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Shear bond strength values of the acid reconditioned brackets were significantly lower (8.0 ± 3.1 MPa) compared to the control group (12.9 ± 2.9 MPa). Laser-reconditioned (32.8 ± 2.7%) and laser-debonded (30.9 ± 2.4%) brackets showed the lowest force loss due to friction (control group 38.3 ± 3.0%). No significant differences were observed between groups regarding slot size and fracture strength. All groups had color differences of <math> <msubsup><mrow><mo>∆</mo> <mi>E</mi></mrow> <mrow><mi>a</mi> <mi>b</mi></mrow> <mi>*</mi></msubsup> </math> < 10. Scanning electron microscope images and ARI scores indicated that most of the residues on the bracket bases were removed.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>All reconditioning methods yielded adequate results regarding bracket properties. Yet, focusing on the need to protect the enamel and the bracket base, laser debonding seems to be the most suitable method for reconditioning ceramic brackets.</p>","PeriodicalId":54776,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Orofacial Orthopedics-Fortschritte Der Kieferorthopadie","volume":" ","pages":"11-23"},"PeriodicalIF":1.3000,"publicationDate":"2025-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11753313/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Comparative evaluation of different debonding and reconditioning methods for orthodontic ceramic brackets regarding effectiveness for reuse : An in vitro study.\",\"authors\":\"Katharina Grosch, Jörg Meister, Sanjay D Raval, Ahmed Mahmoud Fouda, Christoph Bourauel\",\"doi\":\"10.1007/s00056-023-00469-z\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Purpose: </strong>To investigate the reusability of ceramic brackets in terms of shear bond strength, friction behavior, slot dimension, fracture strength, and color stability.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A total of 90 conventionally debonded and 30 by an Er:YAG laser debonded ceramic brackets were collected. All the used brackets were inspected under a stereomicroscope at 18 × magnification and sorted according to their adhesive remnant index (ARI). Five groups were formed (n = 10): (1) new brackets as a control group, (2) flamed and sandblasted, (3) flamed and acid bathed, (4) laser-reconditioned, and (5) laser-debonded brackets. The bracket groups were tested regarding different properties such as shear bond strength, friction behavior, slot size, fracture strength, and color stability. Analysis of variance (ANOVA) and nonparametric Kruskal-Wallis tests were used for statistical analysis (significance level: p < 0.05).</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Shear bond strength values of the acid reconditioned brackets were significantly lower (8.0 ± 3.1 MPa) compared to the control group (12.9 ± 2.9 MPa). Laser-reconditioned (32.8 ± 2.7%) and laser-debonded (30.9 ± 2.4%) brackets showed the lowest force loss due to friction (control group 38.3 ± 3.0%). No significant differences were observed between groups regarding slot size and fracture strength. All groups had color differences of <math> <msubsup><mrow><mo>∆</mo> <mi>E</mi></mrow> <mrow><mi>a</mi> <mi>b</mi></mrow> <mi>*</mi></msubsup> </math> < 10. Scanning electron microscope images and ARI scores indicated that most of the residues on the bracket bases were removed.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>All reconditioning methods yielded adequate results regarding bracket properties. Yet, focusing on the need to protect the enamel and the bracket base, laser debonding seems to be the most suitable method for reconditioning ceramic brackets.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":54776,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of Orofacial Orthopedics-Fortschritte Der Kieferorthopadie\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"11-23\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.3000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-01-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11753313/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of Orofacial Orthopedics-Fortschritte Der Kieferorthopadie\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1007/s00056-023-00469-z\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2023/6/15 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"Epub\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"DENTISTRY, ORAL SURGERY & MEDICINE\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Orofacial Orthopedics-Fortschritte Der Kieferorthopadie","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s00056-023-00469-z","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2023/6/15 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"DENTISTRY, ORAL SURGERY & MEDICINE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

目的:探讨陶瓷托槽在抗剪结合强度、摩擦性能、槽尺寸、断裂强度、颜色稳定性等方面的可重复使用性。方法:收集90例常规脱粘陶瓷托槽和30例Er:YAG激光脱粘陶瓷托槽。所有用过的托架在18 倍体视显微镜下检查,并根据其粘附残余指数(ARI)进行分类。形成五组(n = 10):(1)新支架作为对照组,(2)火焰和喷砂,(3)火焰和酸浴,(4)激光修复,(5)激光去粘接支架。测试了支架组的不同性能,如剪切粘结强度、摩擦性能、槽大小、断裂强度和颜色稳定性。采用方差分析(ANOVA)和非参数Kruskal-Wallis检验进行统计学分析(显著性水平:p )结果:酸修复支架的剪切粘接强度值(8.0 ±3.1 MPa)显著低于对照组(12.9 ±2.9 MPa)。激光修复组(32.8 ±2.7%)和激光去粘接组(30.9 ±2.4%)由于摩擦造成的力损失最小(对照组38.3 ±3.0%)。在槽大小和断裂强度方面,各组间无显著差异。各组颜色差异∆E a b * < 10。扫描电镜图像和ARI评分显示,支架底座上的大部分残留物被去除。结论:所有修复方法均可获得良好的托槽性能。然而,考虑到保护牙釉质和托槽底座的需要,激光脱粘似乎是修复陶瓷托槽最合适的方法。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。

Comparative evaluation of different debonding and reconditioning methods for orthodontic ceramic brackets regarding effectiveness for reuse : An in vitro study.

Comparative evaluation of different debonding and reconditioning methods for orthodontic ceramic brackets regarding effectiveness for reuse : An in vitro study.

Purpose: To investigate the reusability of ceramic brackets in terms of shear bond strength, friction behavior, slot dimension, fracture strength, and color stability.

Methods: A total of 90 conventionally debonded and 30 by an Er:YAG laser debonded ceramic brackets were collected. All the used brackets were inspected under a stereomicroscope at 18 × magnification and sorted according to their adhesive remnant index (ARI). Five groups were formed (n = 10): (1) new brackets as a control group, (2) flamed and sandblasted, (3) flamed and acid bathed, (4) laser-reconditioned, and (5) laser-debonded brackets. The bracket groups were tested regarding different properties such as shear bond strength, friction behavior, slot size, fracture strength, and color stability. Analysis of variance (ANOVA) and nonparametric Kruskal-Wallis tests were used for statistical analysis (significance level: p < 0.05).

Results: Shear bond strength values of the acid reconditioned brackets were significantly lower (8.0 ± 3.1 MPa) compared to the control group (12.9 ± 2.9 MPa). Laser-reconditioned (32.8 ± 2.7%) and laser-debonded (30.9 ± 2.4%) brackets showed the lowest force loss due to friction (control group 38.3 ± 3.0%). No significant differences were observed between groups regarding slot size and fracture strength. All groups had color differences of E a b * < 10. Scanning electron microscope images and ARI scores indicated that most of the residues on the bracket bases were removed.

Conclusion: All reconditioning methods yielded adequate results regarding bracket properties. Yet, focusing on the need to protect the enamel and the bracket base, laser debonding seems to be the most suitable method for reconditioning ceramic brackets.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
3.90
自引率
0.00%
发文量
64
审稿时长
>12 weeks
期刊介绍: The Journal of Orofacial Orthopedics provides orthodontists and dentists who are also actively interested in orthodontics, whether in university clinics or private practice, with highly authoritative and up-to-date information based on experimental and clinical research. The journal is one of the leading publications for the promulgation of the results of original work both in the areas of scientific and clinical orthodontics and related areas. All articles undergo peer review before publication. The German Society of Orthodontics (DGKFO) also publishes in the journal important communications, statements and announcements.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信