检查点抑制剂在透明细胞肾细胞癌中的疗效和安全性:临床试验的系统回顾。

Q1 Medicine
Mahwish Farrukh, Muhammad Ashar Ali, Madiha Naveed, Rooma Habib, Huda Khan, Tooba Kashif, Hina Zubair, Memoona Saeed, Sigmone K Butt, Rabiya Niaz, Ishan Garg, Aqsa Fatima, Wajeeha Aiman
{"title":"检查点抑制剂在透明细胞肾细胞癌中的疗效和安全性:临床试验的系统回顾。","authors":"Mahwish Farrukh,&nbsp;Muhammad Ashar Ali,&nbsp;Madiha Naveed,&nbsp;Rooma Habib,&nbsp;Huda Khan,&nbsp;Tooba Kashif,&nbsp;Hina Zubair,&nbsp;Memoona Saeed,&nbsp;Sigmone K Butt,&nbsp;Rabiya Niaz,&nbsp;Ishan Garg,&nbsp;Aqsa Fatima,&nbsp;Wajeeha Aiman","doi":"10.56875/2589-0646.1027","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Renal cell carcinoma (RCC) is the most common kidney cancer in adults (approximately 90%), and clear cell RCC (ccRCC) is the most frequent histologic subtype (approximately 75%). We reviewed the safety and efficacy of checkpoint inhibitors (CPIs) in ccRCC, identifying 5927 articles in PubMed, Embase, Cochrane, and Web of Science. Ten randomized control (N = 7765) and 10 non-randomized (N = 572) studies were included. Overall, 4819 patients treated with CPI combinations were compared with everolimus, sunitinib, or placebo. Overall response rates (ORR) were 9-25% with nivolumab (niv), 42% with niv + ipilimumab (ipi), 55.7% with niv + cabozantinib, 56% with niv + tivozanib vs. 5% with everolimus. ORR was 51.5-58% with avelumab + axitinib vs. 25.5% with sunitinib. ORR was 59.3-73% with pembrolizumab + tyrosine kinase inhibitor vs. 25.7% with sunitinib. ORR was 32-36% with atezolizumab + bevacizumab vs. 29-33% with sunitinib. In patients with PD-L1+ve and -ve ccRCC, niv, atezolizumab, ipi, and pembrolizumab were safe and effective alone and when combined with cabozantinib, tivozanib, axitinib, levantinib, and pegilodecakin. Atezolizumab + bevacizumab was safe and effective in ccRCC with high PD-L1 expression. Pembrolizumab was safe and effective in preventing recurrence in ccRCC patients with nephrectomy. Additional randomized, double-blind, multicenter clinical trials are needed to confirm these results.</p>","PeriodicalId":39226,"journal":{"name":"Hematology/ Oncology and Stem Cell Therapy","volume":"16 3","pages":"170-185"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-04-04","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Efficacy and Safety of Checkpoint Inhibitors in Clear Cell Renal Cell Carcinoma: A Systematic Review of Clinical Trials.\",\"authors\":\"Mahwish Farrukh,&nbsp;Muhammad Ashar Ali,&nbsp;Madiha Naveed,&nbsp;Rooma Habib,&nbsp;Huda Khan,&nbsp;Tooba Kashif,&nbsp;Hina Zubair,&nbsp;Memoona Saeed,&nbsp;Sigmone K Butt,&nbsp;Rabiya Niaz,&nbsp;Ishan Garg,&nbsp;Aqsa Fatima,&nbsp;Wajeeha Aiman\",\"doi\":\"10.56875/2589-0646.1027\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p>Renal cell carcinoma (RCC) is the most common kidney cancer in adults (approximately 90%), and clear cell RCC (ccRCC) is the most frequent histologic subtype (approximately 75%). We reviewed the safety and efficacy of checkpoint inhibitors (CPIs) in ccRCC, identifying 5927 articles in PubMed, Embase, Cochrane, and Web of Science. Ten randomized control (N = 7765) and 10 non-randomized (N = 572) studies were included. Overall, 4819 patients treated with CPI combinations were compared with everolimus, sunitinib, or placebo. Overall response rates (ORR) were 9-25% with nivolumab (niv), 42% with niv + ipilimumab (ipi), 55.7% with niv + cabozantinib, 56% with niv + tivozanib vs. 5% with everolimus. ORR was 51.5-58% with avelumab + axitinib vs. 25.5% with sunitinib. ORR was 59.3-73% with pembrolizumab + tyrosine kinase inhibitor vs. 25.7% with sunitinib. ORR was 32-36% with atezolizumab + bevacizumab vs. 29-33% with sunitinib. In patients with PD-L1+ve and -ve ccRCC, niv, atezolizumab, ipi, and pembrolizumab were safe and effective alone and when combined with cabozantinib, tivozanib, axitinib, levantinib, and pegilodecakin. Atezolizumab + bevacizumab was safe and effective in ccRCC with high PD-L1 expression. Pembrolizumab was safe and effective in preventing recurrence in ccRCC patients with nephrectomy. Additional randomized, double-blind, multicenter clinical trials are needed to confirm these results.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":39226,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Hematology/ Oncology and Stem Cell Therapy\",\"volume\":\"16 3\",\"pages\":\"170-185\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-04-04\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"1\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Hematology/ Oncology and Stem Cell Therapy\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.56875/2589-0646.1027\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"Medicine\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Hematology/ Oncology and Stem Cell Therapy","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.56875/2589-0646.1027","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"Medicine","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

摘要

肾细胞癌(RCC)是成人中最常见的肾癌(约90%),透明细胞癌(ccRCC)是最常见的组织学亚型(约75%)。我们回顾了检查点抑制剂(CPIs)在ccRCC中的安全性和有效性,在PubMed、Embase、Cochrane和Web of Science中检索了5927篇文章。纳入10项随机对照研究(N = 7765)和10项非随机研究(N = 572)。总的来说,4819名接受CPI联合治疗的患者与依维莫司、舒尼替尼或安慰剂进行了比较。尼武单抗(niv)的总有效率(ORR)为9-25%,尼武单抗+伊匹单抗(ipi)为42%,尼武单抗+卡博赞替尼为55.7%,尼武单抗+替沃扎尼为56%,依维莫司为5%。阿维单抗+阿西替尼组的ORR为51.5-58%,而舒尼替尼组为25.5%。派姆单抗+酪氨酸激酶抑制剂组的ORR为59.3-73%,舒尼替尼组为25.7%。阿特唑单抗+贝伐单抗组的ORR为32-36%,舒尼替尼组为29-33%。在PD-L1+ve和-ve ccRCC患者中,niv、atezolizumab、ipi和pembrolizumab单独使用以及与cabozantinib、tivozanib、axitinib、levantinib和pegilodecakin联合使用是安全有效的。Atezolizumab + bevacizumab对PD-L1高表达的ccRCC安全有效。Pembrolizumab在预防ccRCC肾切除术患者复发方面安全有效。需要更多的随机、双盲、多中心临床试验来证实这些结果。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Efficacy and Safety of Checkpoint Inhibitors in Clear Cell Renal Cell Carcinoma: A Systematic Review of Clinical Trials.

Renal cell carcinoma (RCC) is the most common kidney cancer in adults (approximately 90%), and clear cell RCC (ccRCC) is the most frequent histologic subtype (approximately 75%). We reviewed the safety and efficacy of checkpoint inhibitors (CPIs) in ccRCC, identifying 5927 articles in PubMed, Embase, Cochrane, and Web of Science. Ten randomized control (N = 7765) and 10 non-randomized (N = 572) studies were included. Overall, 4819 patients treated with CPI combinations were compared with everolimus, sunitinib, or placebo. Overall response rates (ORR) were 9-25% with nivolumab (niv), 42% with niv + ipilimumab (ipi), 55.7% with niv + cabozantinib, 56% with niv + tivozanib vs. 5% with everolimus. ORR was 51.5-58% with avelumab + axitinib vs. 25.5% with sunitinib. ORR was 59.3-73% with pembrolizumab + tyrosine kinase inhibitor vs. 25.7% with sunitinib. ORR was 32-36% with atezolizumab + bevacizumab vs. 29-33% with sunitinib. In patients with PD-L1+ve and -ve ccRCC, niv, atezolizumab, ipi, and pembrolizumab were safe and effective alone and when combined with cabozantinib, tivozanib, axitinib, levantinib, and pegilodecakin. Atezolizumab + bevacizumab was safe and effective in ccRCC with high PD-L1 expression. Pembrolizumab was safe and effective in preventing recurrence in ccRCC patients with nephrectomy. Additional randomized, double-blind, multicenter clinical trials are needed to confirm these results.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
4.30
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
审稿时长
27 weeks
期刊介绍: Hematology Oncology and Stem Cell Therapy is an international, peer-reviewed, open access journal that provides a vehicle for publications of high-quality clinical as well as basic science research reports in hematology and oncology. The contents of the journal also emphasize the growing importance of hematopoietic stem cell therapy for treatment of various benign and malignant hematologic disorders and certain solid tumors.The journal prioritizes publication of original research articles but also would give consideration for brief reports, review articles, special communications, and unique case reports. It also offers a special section for clinically relevant images that provide an important educational value.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信